Love-wave normal modes discriminate between upper-mantle and crustal earthquakes: Simulation and demonstration in Tibet

2021 ◽  
Vol 571 ◽  
pp. 117089
Author(s):  
Shiqi Wang ◽  
Simon L. Klemperer
1968 ◽  
Vol 73 (10) ◽  
pp. 3349-3350 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Takeuchi ◽  
Y. Hamano ◽  
Y. Hasegawa
Keyword(s):  

1969 ◽  
Vol 59 (4) ◽  
pp. 1695-1712
Author(s):  
Abou-Bakr K. Ibrahim

Abstract By using the leaking and normal mode dispersion curves, the average crustal and upper mantle structure is determined for seven different paths. The paths originate from earthquakes in Greece, Turkey, West Pakistan, Tibet, Kamchatka, Kurile Islands and Mexico. Records from Uppsala and Umeå, Sweden, are used. The characteristics of the leaking modes at different distances are examined. Surface waves are used to put more constraint on the models chosen using only the leaking wave data and to verify their mode of propagation. A good fit for observational data of both the leaking mode (PL or PLH2) and the normal mode (Rayleigh) is found to one model for each path. The average crustal structures from Greece and Turkey to Uppsala are identical. The crustal and upper mantle models for paths from Tibet, West Pakistan, Kamchatka and Kurile Islands have approximately the same velocities but different crustal thicknesses. The dispersion characters of Mexican and North American paths are similar, while the average crustal thickness for the Asiatic paths is 5-15 km greater than for the Mexican path. Since the dispersions of the leaking and normal modes are explained by one and the same structural model, it indicates that our hypothesis about the propagation of the leaking waves is true, and that a substantial portion of the long-period wave trains between the P and S waves can be explained in terms of these leaking modes.


2014 ◽  
Vol 115 (17) ◽  
pp. 17D123 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tanmoy Pramanik ◽  
Urmimala Roy ◽  
Maxim Tsoi ◽  
Leonard F. Register ◽  
Sanjay K. Banerjee

2006 ◽  
Vol 155 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 48-62 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amal Sebai ◽  
Eléonore Stutzmann ◽  
Jean-Paul Montagner ◽  
Déborah Sicilia ◽  
Eric Beucler

1968 ◽  
Vol 58 (6) ◽  
pp. 1821-1831
Author(s):  
A. J. Wickens ◽  
K. Pec

ABSTRACT Love-wave phase velocities were determined for five adjacent segments of a 5000 kilometer great circle path from Mould Bay, Canada, to Tucson, Arizona. Mean-phase velocity curves were obtained from curves based on reciprocal data, thus minimizing the detrimental effects of non-parallel layering. By careful selection and precise treatment of the data over relatively short distances (800 km), detail hitherto suppressed has been retained. Finally, by using reciprocal seismograms, the effect of sloping interfaces was observed. The crustal and upper mantle models obtained indicate significant differences in structure between different provinces of the Precambrian Shield.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ranjith Kunnath

<p>A model that explains the anomalies in the Love wave dispersion in the earth is presented. Conventionally, welded contact between the crust and the upper mantle is assumed, leading to Love wave generation when the earth is excited. However, the observations of SH wave dispersion at seismic frequencies is at variance with this model, at least for some crustal plates (Ekström, 2011). When frictional slip occurs at the crust-upper mantle interface, a new type of interfacial elastic wave called the antiplane slip wave can occur (Ranjith, 2017). It is shown that the antiplane slip waves can explain the observed anomalies in the Love wave dispersion. </p>


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document