Assessment of Social Anxiety in First Episode Psychosis using the Liebowitz Social Anxiety scale as a Self-report Measure

2010 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 115-121 ◽  
Author(s):  
K.L. Romm ◽  
J.I. Rossberg ◽  
A.O. Berg ◽  
C.F. Hansen ◽  
O.A. Andreassen ◽  
...  

AbstractObjectiveSocial anxiety is a common problem in psychotic disorders. The Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale, Self-Rating version (LSAS-SR) is a widely used instrument to capture different aspects of social anxiety, but its psychometric properties have not been tested in this patient group. The aims of the present study were to evaluate the psychometric properties of the LSAS-SR in patients with first episode psychosis, to investigate whether it differentiated between active and passive social withdrawal and to test which clinical factors contributed to current level of social anxiety.MethodA total of 144 first episode psychosis patients from the ongoing Thematically Organized Psychosis (TOP) study were included at the time of first treatment. Diagnoses were set according to the Structured Clinical Interview (SCID-1) for DSM-IV. A factor analysis was carried out and the relationship of social anxiety to psychotic and general symptomatology measured by the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) was evaluated. Possible contributors to social anxiety were analyzed using multiple hierarchic regression analysis.ResultsThe factor analysis identified three subscales: public performance, social interaction and observation. All three subscales showed satisfactory psychometric properties, acceptable convergent and discriminate properties, and confirmed previous findings in social anxiety samples. Self-esteem explained a significant amount of the variance in social anxiety, even after adjusting for the effects of delusions, suspiciousness and depression.ConclusionThe study shows that the LSAS-SR can be used in this patient group, that social anxiety is strongly related to both behavioral social avoidance and to self-esteem. The results support the use of this measure in assessment of social anxiety in both clinical settings and in research.

2015 ◽  
Vol 227 (2-3) ◽  
pp. 213-218 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simone Ciufolini ◽  
Craig Morgan ◽  
Kevin Morgan ◽  
Paul Fearon ◽  
Jane Boydell ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Alexandre Heeren ◽  
Pierre Maurage ◽  
Mandy Rossignol ◽  
Morgane Vanhaelen ◽  
Virginie Peschard ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 33-39 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ann Faerden ◽  
Ragnar Nesvåg ◽  
Elizabeth Ann Barrett ◽  
Ingrid Agartz ◽  
Arnstein Finset ◽  
...  

AbstractBackgroundRecently there has been a renewed interest in defining the boundaries and subdomains of the negative syndrome in schizophrenia and new scales have been asked for. Apathy is one of the symptoms in focus. The Apathy Evaluation Scale (AES) with its clinical version (AES-C) is one of the most used scales in an interdisciplinary context, but it has never previously been used in a population with first episode psychosis. The main aims of this study were to examine the psychometric properties of the AES-C and its relationship to the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS).MethodsA total of 104 patients with first episode psychosis from the ongoing Thematic Organized Psychosis Research (TOP) study were included.ResultsA factor analysis of the AES-C identified three subscales: Apathy, Insight and Social Contacts. Only the Apathy subscale showed satisfactory psychometric properties and showed acceptable convergent and discriminate properties by correlating strongly with the apathy-related items of the PANSS.ConclusionsThis study shows that the AES-C measures more than one dimension. The main factor, the Apathy subscale, can however be used to assess apathy in first episode psychosis patients in the ongoing work of refining the subdomains of the negative syndrome.


2010 ◽  
Vol 58 (1) ◽  
pp. 41-46 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nadia Vracotas ◽  
Srividya N. Iyer ◽  
Ridha Joober ◽  
Ashok Malla

2007 ◽  
Vol 45 (5) ◽  
pp. 1025-1037 ◽  
Author(s):  
Max Birchwood ◽  
Peter Trower ◽  
Kat Brunet ◽  
Paul Gilbert ◽  
Zaffer Iqbal ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 43-54 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nasrettin Sönmez ◽  
Roger Hagen ◽  
Ole A. Andreassen ◽  
Kristin Lie Romm ◽  
Marit Grande ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 18 (3) ◽  
pp. 221-228 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Raune ◽  
Elizabeth Kuipers ◽  
Paul Bebbington

SUMMARYAim – To test the hypothesis that stressful life events, in particular intrusive events, would cluster before the first onset of psychosis. Method – Forty-one patients with first episode psychosis were interviewed with the Life Events and Difficulties Schedule to assess events in the year before the onset of illness. Events were rated contextually on timing, independence, threat, and intrusiveness. Within-patient group clustering was evaluated, and the patient group was compared with two general population surveys from London. Results – Events were very frequent in the year before the onset of psychosis. Stressful and intrusive events were more common in the three months before onset compared with the previous nine months, although few analyses reached conventional statistical significance. Threatening and intrusive events were much more frequent in patients than in the comparison groups. First episode psychosis patients were strikingly more likely to report an intrusive event in the three months before onset (OR=17.1, 34% v 3%), and also showed an excess between three months and one year before onset (OR=8.1, 11% v 3%). Conclusions – Events may trigger many cases of first episode psychosis. The effect emerges several months before onset, particularly if the events are intrusive. This has both theoretical and clinical implications.Declaration of Interest: DR was supported by a UK Medical Research Council studentship. The authors have no conflicts of interest in writing this paper.


2019 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carla McEnery ◽  
Michelle H. Lim ◽  
Ann Knowles ◽  
Simon Rice ◽  
John Gleeson ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document