Relationship between pain-coping strategies, catastrophizing to pain and severity of depression

2017 ◽  
Vol 41 (S1) ◽  
pp. S522-S522
Author(s):  
B. Batinic ◽  
J. Nesvanulica ◽  
I. Stankovic
Keyword(s):  
Coping Strategies ◽  
Pain Catastrophizing ◽  
Short Form ◽  
Brief Pain Inventory ◽  
Average Score ◽  
Coping Mechanism ◽  
Pain Coping ◽  
Passive Coping ◽  
Somatic Pain ◽  
Severity Of Depression

IntroductionStudies have shown that somatic pain influences the severity of major depressive disorder (MDD), and could be moderated through pain coping strategies and not catastrophizing to pain.ObjectivesThe aim of the study was to ascertain the correlation between pain coping strategies, catastrophizing to pain and severity of depression.MethodsThe study sample consisted of 82 patients diagnosed with MDD, aged between 18 and 65 years old (M = 46.21). Assessment instruments included The Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II), The Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form-BPISF (consisting of two subscales: BPI1-intensity of pain, and BPI2-interference with daily functioning), The Vanderbilt Pain Management Inventory-VPMI (consisting of active-VPMIAC and passive pain coping mechanism subscales-VPMIPC) and The Pain Catastrophizing Scale-PCS (consisting of subscales of rumination, exaggeration and helplessness).ResultsThe average BDI-II score was 27.21 (SD = 11.53); the average score at BPI1 was 2.99 (SD = 2.83) and 3.35 (SD = 3.26) at BPI2; the average scores on the active coping mechanism subscale was 20.72 (SD = 4.87), and on the passive coping mechanism subscale 34.05 (SD = 7.86); the average catastrophizing scale score was 28.78 (SD = 10.72). Active mechanism of pain coping has shown significant negative correlation with depression (r = –0.227, P > 0.05) while passive mechanism of pain coping has shown significant positive correlation with depression (r = 0.269, P > 0.05). Intensity of depression was significantly positively correlated with intensity of catastrophizing to pain (r = 0.358, P > 0.01) and its derivatives: rumination, exaggeration and helplessness.ConclusionInterventions focusing on targeting catastrophizing to pain and pain coping mechanisms should be considered in the treatment of patients with MDD with somatic pain.Disclosure of interestThe authors have not supplied their declaration of competing interest.

scholarly journals Chronic Pain Assessment: A Seven-Factor Model

2008 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 299-308 ◽  
Author(s):  
Megan A Davidson ◽  
Dean A Tripp ◽  
Leandre R Fabrigar ◽  
Paul R Davidson
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Pain ◽  
Coping Strategies ◽  
Factor Model ◽  
Pain Catastrophizing ◽  
Short Form ◽  
Activity Level ◽  
Mcgill Pain Questionnaire ◽  
Pain Coping ◽  
Pain Experience ◽  
The Core

BACKGROUND: There are many measures assessing related dimensions of the chronic pain experience (eg, pain severity, pain coping, depression, activity level), but the relationships among them have not been systematically established.OBJECTIVE: The present study set out to determine the core dimensions requiring assessment in individuals with chronic pain.METHODS: Individuals with chronic pain (n=126) completed the Beck Anxiety Inventory, Beck Depression Inventory, Beck Hopelessness Scale, Chronic Pain Coping Index, Multidimensional Pain Inventory, Pain Catastrophizing Scale, McGill Pain Questionnaire – Short Form, Pain Disability Index and the Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia.RESULTS: Before an exploratory factor analysis (EFA) of the nine chronic pain measures, EFAs were conducted on each of the individual measures, and the derived factors (subscales) from each measure were submitted together for a single EFA. A seven-factor model best fit the data, representing the core factors of pain and disability, pain description, affective distress, support, positive coping strategies, negative coping strategies and activity.CONCLUSIONS: Seven meaningful dimensions of the pain experience were reliably and systematically extracted. Implications and future directions for this work are discussed.

scholarly journals Pain coping strategies and their association with quality of life in people with Parkinson’s disease: A cross-sectional study

PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (11) ◽  
pp. e0257966
Author(s):  
Tino Prell ◽  
Jenny Doris Liebermann ◽  
Sarah Mendorf ◽  
Thomas Lehmann ◽  
Hannah M. Zipprich
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Coping Strategies ◽  
Motor Function ◽  
Active Coping ◽  
Pain Rating ◽  
Pain Coping ◽  
Coping Response ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Passive Coping

Objective To develop multidimensional approaches for pain management, this study aimed to understand how PD patients cope with pain. Design Cross-sectional, cohort study. Setting Monocentric, inpatient, university hospital. Participants 52 patients with Parkinson’s disease (without dementia) analysed. Primary and secondary outcome measures Motor function, nonmotor symptoms, health-related quality of life (QoL), and the Coping Strategies Questionnaire were assessed. Elastic net regularization and multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) were used to study the association among coping, clinical parameters, and QoL. Results Most patients cope with pain through active cognitive (coping self-statements) and active behavioral strategies (increasing pain behaviors and increasing activity level). Active coping was associated with lower pain rating. Regarding QoL domains, active coping was associated with better physical functioning and better energy, whereas passive coping was associated with poorer emotional well-being. However, as demonstrated by MANOVA, the impact of coping factors (active and passive) on the Short Form 36 domains was negligible after correction for age, motor function, and depression. Conclusion Passive coping strategies are the most likely coping response of those with depressive symptoms, whereas active coping strategies are the most likely coping response to influence physical function. Although coping is associated with pain rating, the extent that pain coping responses can impact on QoL seems to be low.

Feelings of Usefulness to Others Predict Active Coping With Osteoarthritis Knee Pain

2016 ◽  
Vol 29 (5) ◽  
pp. 826-841
Author(s):  
Christina M. Pierpaoli ◽  
Patricia A. Parmelee
Keyword(s):  
Coping Strategies ◽  
Functional Disability ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Subjective Health ◽  
Perceived Usefulness ◽  
Pain Coping ◽  
Positive Health ◽  
Passive Coping ◽  
Personality Variables ◽  
Knee Oa

Objective: To investigate associations of perceived usefulness to other people with active versus passive coping strategies among adults with knee osteoarthritis (OA). Additional aims explored contributions of personality variables to this dynamic. Method: 199 persons (70.3 years ± 10.4) with knee OA reported personality, coping, and psychosocial data using the Big Five Inventory, subscales from the Social Provisions Scale, and the Coping With Illness measure. Regression analyses identified predictors of perceived usefulness and its independent and interactive associations with active versus passive coping and personality variables. Results: Better subjective health predicted perceived usefulness. Older adults with higher reported perceived usefulness employed more active than passive pain coping strategies. Passive coping was associated with neuroticism and greater functional disability. Discussion: Usefulness predicted active OA pain coping, suggesting that it may promote well-being among persons with chronic pain. Further study investigating perceived usefulness in promoting positive health behaviors is needed.

The relationship between pain coping variability and committed action in chronic pain adjustment

2016 ◽  
Vol 33 (S1) ◽  
pp. S209-S209
Author(s):  
W. Wong ◽  
P. Chen ◽  
Y. Chow ◽  
H. Lim ◽  
S. Wong ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Pain ◽  
Coping Strategies ◽  
Independent Predictor ◽  
Pain Catastrophizing ◽  
Chinese Patients ◽  
Pain Coping ◽  
Significant Independent Predictor ◽  
Competing Interest ◽  
Pain Adjustment ◽  
Independent Effects

IntroductionResearch evidenced the association of pain coping strategies with short-term and long-term adjustments to chronic pain. Yet, previous studies mainly assessed the frequency of coping strategies when pain occurs whilst no data is available on one's flexibility/rigidity in using different pain coping strategies, i.e., pain coping variability, in dealing with different situations.ObjectivesThis study aimed to examine the multivariate association between pain coping variability and committed action in predicting concurrent pain-related disability. Specifically, we examined the independent effects of pain coping variability and committed action in predicting concurrent pain-related disability in a sample of Chinese patients with chronic pain.MethodsChronic pain patients (n = 287) completed a test battery assessing pain intensity/disability, pain coping strategies and variability, committed action, and pain catastrophizing. Multiple regression modeling compared the association of individual pain coping strategies and pain coping variability with disability (Models 1–2), and examined the independent effects of committed action and pain coping variability on disability (Model 3).ResultsOf the 8 coping strategies assessed, only guarding (std β = 0.17) was emerged as significant independent predictor of disability (Model 1). Pain coping variability (std β = −0.10) was associated with disability after controlling for guarding and other covariates (Model 2) and was emerged as independent predictor of disability (Model 3: std β = −0.11) (all P < 0.05) (Tables 1 and 2).ConclusionsOur data offers preliminary support for the multivariate association between pain coping variability and committed action in predicting concurrent pain-related disability, which supplements the existing pain coping data that are largely based on assessing frequency of coping.Disclosure of interestThe authors have not supplied their declaration of competing interest.

scholarly journals Migraine Disability, Pain Catastrophizing, And Headache Severity Are Associated With Evoked Pain And Targeted By Mind-Body Therapy

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samuel R Krimmel ◽  
Michael L Keaser ◽  
Darrah R Speis ◽  
Jennifer A Haythornthwaite ◽  
David A Seminowicz
Keyword(s):  
Sleep Disturbances ◽  
Pain Catastrophizing ◽  
Short Form ◽  
Brief Pain Inventory ◽  
Small Sample ◽  
Mcgill Pain Questionnaire ◽  
Headache Frequency ◽  
Healthy Controls ◽  
Pain Ratings ◽  
Body Therapy

Meta-analysis suggests migraine patients are no more sensitive to experimentally evoked pain than healthy controls. At the same time, studies have linked some migraine symptoms to Quantitative Sensory Testing (QST) profiles. Unfortunately, previous studies associating migraine symptoms and QST have important methodological shortcomings, stemming from inappropriate statistics, small sample sizes, and frequent use of univariate statistics for multivariate research questions. In the current study we seek to address these limitations by using a large sample of episodic migraine patients (n=103) and a multivariate analysis that associates pain ratings from many thermal intensities simultaneously with 12 clinical measures ranging from headache frequency to sleep abnormalities. We identified a single dimension of association between QST and migraine symptoms that relates to pain ratings for all stimulus intensities and a subset of migraine symptoms relating to disability (Headache Impact Trauma 6 and Brief Pain Inventory interference), catastrophizing (Pain Catastrophizing Scale), and pain severity (average headache pain, Brief Pain Inventory severity, and Short Form McGill Pain Questionnaire 2). Headache frequency, allodynia, affect, and sleep disturbances were unrelated to this dimension. Consistent with previous research, we did not observe any difference in QST ratings between migraine patients and healthy controls. Additionally, we found that the linear combination of symptoms that related to QST were modified by mind-body therapy. These results suggest that QST has a selective relationship with pain symptoms even in the absence of between-subjects differences between chronic pain patients and healthy controls.

scholarly journals An experimental investigation of the relationships among race, prayer, and pain

2018 ◽  
Vol 18 (3) ◽  
pp. 545-553 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samantha M. Meints ◽  
Catherine Mosher ◽  
Kevin L. Rand ◽  
Leslie Ashburn-Nardo ◽  
Adam T. Hirsh
Keyword(s):  
Coping Strategies ◽  
Pain Catastrophizing ◽  
Pain Tolerance ◽  
General Tendency ◽  
Race Difference ◽  
Cold Pain ◽  
Passive Coping ◽  
Main Effect ◽  
Pain Outcomes ◽  
Lower Pain

Abstract Background and aims Compared to White individuals, Black individuals demonstrate a lower pain tolerance. Research suggests that differences in pain coping strategies, such as prayer, may mediate this race difference. However, previous research has been cross-sectional and has not determined whether prayer in and of itself or rather the passive nature of prayer is driving the effects on pain tolerance. The aim of this study was to clarify the relationships among race, prayer (both active and passive), and pain tolerance. Methods We randomly assigned 208 pain-free participants (47% Black, 53% White) to one of three groups: active prayer (“God, help me endure the pain”), passive prayer (“God, take the pain away”), or no prayer (“The sky is blue”). Participants first completed a series of questionnaires including the Duke University Religion Index, the Coping Strategies Questionnaire-Revised (CSQ-R), and the Pain Catastrophizing Scale. Participants were then instructed to repeat a specified prayer or distractor coping statement while undergoing a cold pressor task. Cold pain tolerance was measured by the number of seconds that had elapsed while the participant’s hand remained in the cold water bath (maximum 180 s). Results Results of independent samples t-tests indicated that Black participants scored higher on the CSQ-R prayer/hoping subscale. However, there were no race differences among other coping strategies, religiosity, or catastrophizing. Results of a 2 (Race: White vs. Black)×3 (Prayer: active vs. passive vs. no prayer) ANCOVA controlling for a general tendency to pray and catastrophizing in response to prayer indicated a main effect of prayer that approached significance (p=0.06). Pairwise comparisons indicated that those in the active prayer condition demonstrated greater pain tolerance than those in the passive (p=0.06) and no prayer (p=0.03) conditions. Those in the passive and no prayer distractor conditions did not significantly differ (p=0.70). There was also a trending main effect of race [p=0.08], with White participants demonstrating greater pain tolerance than Black participants. Conclusions Taken together, these results indicate that Black participants demonstrated a lower pain tolerance than White participants, and those in the active prayer condition demonstrated greater tolerance than those in the passive and no prayer conditions. Furthermore, Black participants in the passive prayer group demonstrated the lowest pain tolerance, while White participants in the active prayer group exhibited the greatest tolerance. Results of this study suggest that passive prayer, like other passive coping strategies, may be related to lower pain tolerance and thus poorer pain outcomes, perhaps especially for Black individuals. On the other hand, results suggest active prayer is associated with greater pain tolerance, especially for White individuals. Implications These results suggest that understanding the influence of prayer on pain may require differentiation between active versus passive prayer strategies. Like other active coping strategies for pain, active prayer may facilitate self-management of pain and thus enhance pain outcomes independent of race. Psychosocial interventions may help religiously-oriented individuals, regardless of race, cultivate a more active style of prayer to improve their quality of life.

scholarly journals Validation of the Turkish version of the Pain Sensitivity Questionnaire in patients with chronic pain

2021 ◽  
Vol 49 (12) ◽  
pp. 030006052110601
Author(s):  
Ferda Yilmaz Inal ◽  
Kursat Gul ◽  
Yadigar Yilmaz Camgoz ◽  
Hayrettin Daskaya ◽  
Hasan Kocoglu
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Pain ◽  
Pain Sensitivity ◽  
Chronic Back Pain ◽  
Pain Catastrophizing ◽  
Short Form ◽  
Interventional Procedure ◽  
Experimental Pain ◽  
Brief Pain Inventory ◽  
Turkish Population ◽  
Turkish People

Objective The Pain Sensitivity Questionnaire (PSQ) is a clinically beneficial instrument that has been proven to be correlated with various experimental pain sensitivity assessments in healthy people and in patients with chronic pain. In this study, we aimed to translate the PSQ into Turkish (PSQ-T) and validate it for the measurement of pain sensitivity among Turkish people. Methods Seventy-three patients with chronic back pain who were planning to undergo an interventional procedure completed the Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-SF), Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), Beck Anxiety Inventory, Pain Catastrophizing Scale, and PSQ prior to their procedure. Subcutaneous infiltration of lidocaine was used as a standardized experimental pain stimulus. Pain was evaluated using a visual analog scale (VAS 1: infiltration in the hand, and VAS 2: infiltration in the procedure area) Results Scores on the PSQ-T were significantly correlated with those on the BPI-SF. A significant positive relationship was observed between VAS 1 and VAS 2 values and the PSQ-T score, BPI pain score, and BPI interference score. Conclusions The PSQ-T can be used as a valid and reliable tool for the assessment of pain sensitivity in the Turkish population.

The role of pain coping strategies in prognosis after whiplash injury: Passive coping predicts slowed recovery

Pain ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 124 (1) ◽  
pp. 18-26 ◽  
Author(s):  
Linda J. Carroll ◽  
David J. Cassidy ◽  
Pierre Côté
Keyword(s):  
Coping Strategies ◽  
Whiplash Injury ◽  
Pain Coping ◽  
Passive Coping

Coping Strategies for Physically Challenged Children

2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (09) ◽  
Author(s):  
Bindu Kaipparettu Abraham
Keyword(s):  
Coping Strategies ◽  
Physical Disability ◽  
Social Problems ◽  
Sampling Technique ◽  
Special School ◽  
Coping Mechanism ◽  
Descriptive Research ◽  
Positive Coping ◽  
Negative Coping ◽  
Physically Challenged

The aim of this research is to assess the coping strategies of physically challenged children. The area of assessment included in physical, emotional and social problems related to their physical disability. Descriptive research design was selected to study the physical, emotional and social problems and its coping strategies of physically challenged children. Purposive sampling technique used for 50 samples of Physically challenged children between the age group of 10-15 years who were educated at the special school in Mangalore. It was reached from the result of the findings that physically challenged children are using negative coping mechanism for social problems related to their physical disability whereas physical and emotional problems related to physical disability most of them are using positive coping mechanism.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document