Psychological distance of timber harvesting for private woodland owners

2017 ◽  
Vol 81 ◽  
pp. 48-56 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emily S. Huff ◽  
Jessica E. Leahy ◽  
David B. Kittredge ◽  
Caroline L. Noblet ◽  
Aaron R. Weiskittel
2015 ◽  
Vol 113 (5) ◽  
pp. 490-499 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emily J. Silver ◽  
Jessica E. Leahy ◽  
Aaron R. Weiskittel ◽  
Caroline L. Noblet ◽  
David B. Kittredge

1992 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 146-148 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas W. Birch ◽  
David A. Gansner ◽  
Stanford L. Arner ◽  
Richard H. Widmann

Abstract A recently completed forest inventory and woodland owner survey have given us insight into contemporary cutting activities in West Virginia. About one-third of the private woodland owners have harvested timber from their holdings at some time in the past and they control two-thirds of the private timberland. Although timber harvesting has increased in recent years, it remains a concentrated activity. Remeasured plot data show that only 24% of the timberland had cutting disturbance between the last two inventories. Four-fifths of the cutting took place on one-tenth of the timberland. The timber resource is ripe for more cutting, landowner attitudes have changed to favor increased harvesting, and recent government initiatives support a climate for timber development. There is no denying that physical supplies of timber and landowner intentions reveal a potential opportunity for significant expansion in wood use. North. J. Appl. For. 9(4):146-148.


1990 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 118-120 ◽  
Author(s):  
David A. Gansner ◽  
Thomas W. Birch ◽  
Stanford L. Arner ◽  
Stanley J. Zarnoch

Abstract Recently completed forest inventories and woodland owner surveys for each of the six New England states have given us insight into contemporary harvesting activities in the region. About half of the private woodland owners have harvested timber from their holdings at some time in the past. Still, timber harvesting continues to be a fairly concentrated activity. Remeasured plot data indicate that only 30% of the timberland had cutting disturbance between the last two inventories. And two-thirds of the cutting took place on one-tenth of the timberland. Economics more than textbook silviculture determines the kind of cutting that takes place. The good housekeeping associated with better silviculture could result in dramatic improvements in production. Even so, New England's woodlands have held their own and appear to be in relatively good shape. Physical supplies of timber reveal a potential opportunity for significant expansion in wood use. North. J. Appl. For. 7:118-120, September 1990.


2014 ◽  
Vol 45 (4) ◽  
pp. 327-334 ◽  
Author(s):  
Han Gong ◽  
Douglas L. Medin ◽  
Tal Eyal ◽  
Nira Liberman ◽  
Yaacov Trope ◽  
...  

In the hope to resolve the two sets of opposing results concerning the effects of psychological distance and construal levels on moral judgment, Žeželj and Jokić (2014) conducted a series of four direct replications, which yielded divergent patterns of results. In our commentary, we first revisit the consistent findings that lower-level construals induced by How/Why manipulation lead to harsher moral condemnation than higher-level construals. We then speculate on the puzzling patterns of results regarding the role of temporal distance in shaping moral judgment. And we conclude by discussing the complexity of morality and propose that it may be important to incorporate cultural systems into the study of moral cognition.


2014 ◽  
Vol 45 (3) ◽  
pp. 223-231 ◽  
Author(s):  
Iris L. Žeželj ◽  
Biljana R. Jokić

Eyal, Liberman, and Trope (2008) established that people judged moral transgressions more harshly and virtuous acts more positively when the acts were psychologically distant than close. In a series of conceptual and direct replications, Gong and Medin (2012) came to the opposite conclusion. Attempting to resolve these inconsistencies, we conducted four high-powered replication studies in which we varied temporal distance (Studies 1 and 3), social distance (Study 2) or construal level (Study 4), and registered their impact on moral judgment. We found no systematic effect of temporal distance, the effect of social distance consistent with Eyal et al., and the reversed effect of direct construal level manipulation, consistent with Gong and Medin. Possible explanations for the incompatible results are discussed.


1969 ◽  
Author(s):  
Herbert Kelman ◽  
Mary E. Collins ◽  
Ira J. Firestone ◽  
Martin Fishbein ◽  
Kalman J. Kaplan

2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ya-Ling Wang ◽  
Ozlem Ayduk ◽  
Yi-Cheng Lin ◽  
Chin-Lan Huang

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document