Distribution of rare earth elements in the pilot-scale processing of fly ashes derived from eastern Kentucky coals: Comparisons of the feed and processed ashes

Fuel ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 295 ◽  
pp. 120562
Author(s):  
James C. Hower ◽  
John G. Groppo ◽  
Robert B. Jewell ◽  
John D. Wiseman ◽  
Tristana Y. Duvallet ◽  
...  
Minerals ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 105 ◽  
Author(s):  
James C. Hower ◽  
John G. Groppo ◽  
Prakash Joshi ◽  
Dorin V. Preda ◽  
David P. Gamliel ◽  
...  

In this study, Central Appalachian coal-derived fly ashes from two power plants were beneficiated in a pilot-scale facility in order to produce a product with a relatively consistent concentration of rare earth elements (REE). The <200-mesh final fly ash product was produced by removing the carbon- and Fe-rich particles prior to screening at 200 mesh (75 µm). The Plant D fly ash had high concentrations of CaO and SO3, which were diminished through the two months when the ash was being beneficiated, representing a consequence of the heat, humidity, and excessive rainfall in the Kentucky summer. The high CaO and SO3 concentrations through the early runs likely contributed to the lower REE in the <200-mesh products of those runs. Of the non-REE minor elements, Ba, V, Mn, Zn, and As showed the greatest between-run variations within the runs for each plant. The overall REE concentrations proved to be similar, both on a between-run basis for the individual fly ash sources and on a between-plant basis. Variations in fly ash quality will occur in larger-scale operations, so on-going attention to the fly ash quality and the response of the fly ash to beneficiation is necessary. Changes in the Plant D fly ash with time imply that both the freshness of the original ash and the length and conditions of its storage at the site of beneficiation could be factors in the quality and consistency of the processed fly ash.


2016 ◽  
Vol 160-161 ◽  
pp. 73-81 ◽  
Author(s):  
James C. Hower ◽  
Cortland F. Eble ◽  
Shifeng Dai ◽  
Harvey E. Belkin

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
James C. Hower ◽  
◽  
Cortland Eble ◽  
John G. Groppo ◽  
Rick Q. Honaker

2020 ◽  
Vol 124 ◽  
pp. 103638
Author(s):  
Zdzisław Adamczyk ◽  
Joanna Komorek ◽  
Barbara Białecka ◽  
Jacek Nowak ◽  
Agnieszka Klupa

Metals ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 142
Author(s):  
Aleksandra Rybak ◽  
Aurelia Rybak

The article covers the issues related to the characteristics, application, and some methods of rare earth elements (REEs) recovery from coal fly ashes. REEs are elements with growing demand and a very wide range of application, especially when it comes to modern technologies. The conducted analysis and price forecast proved the existing upward tendency, and this confirmed the need to search for new REE sources, among industrial waste (proecological effect). The development of the REE recovery technology would involve solving several problems related to REE speciation, optimization of factors controlling their extractivity and selection of the REE separation method from obtained extraction solutions with a very extreme pH and complicated composition. The paper presented advantages and disadvantages of usually used methods of REE separation from coal fly ashes, like physical and acid–base leaching. It was also presented alternative REE recovery techniques in the form of membrane and biological methods and based on ion liquids (ILs) or chelating agents. The directions of further modifications, which will allow the efficient REE recovery were presented. The aim of this article was to propose specific solutions based on the creation of appropriate multistage method of REE recovery. It will be a combination of magnetic and size separation, acid–base leaching (including roasting in justified cases), removal of matrix elements with ILs (Al, Si, and Fe), and finally REE membrane separation, allowing one to obtain the appropriate process efficiency.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document