scholarly journals Corrigendum to “Gas seepage in underground coal seams: Application of the equivalent scale of coal matrix-fracture structures in coal permeability measurements” [Fuel 288 (2021) 119641]

Fuel ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 305 ◽  
pp. 121550
Author(s):  
Haijun Guo ◽  
Hanlu Tang ◽  
Yuchen Wu ◽  
Kai Wang ◽  
Chao Xu
2007 ◽  
Vol 10 (03) ◽  
pp. 260-269 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eric P. Robertson ◽  
Richard L. Christiansen

Summary Sorption-induced strain and permeability were measured as a function of pore pressure using subbituminous coal from the Powder River basin of Wyoming, USA, and high-volatile bituminous coal from the Uinta-Piceance basin of Utah, USA. We found that for these coal samples, cleat compressibility was not constant, but variable. Calculated variable cleat-compressibility constants were found to correlate well with previously published data for other coals. Sorption-induced matrix strain (shrinkage/swelling) was measured on unconstrained samples for different gases: carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), and nitrogen (N2). During permeability tests, sorption-induced matrix shrinkage was demonstrated clearly by higher-permeability values at lower pore pressures while holding overburden pressure constant; this effect was more pronounced when gases with higher adsorption isotherms such as CO2 were used. Measured permeability data were modeled using three different permeability models that take into account sorption-induced matrix strain. We found that when the measured strain data were applied, all three models matched the measured permeability results poorly. However, by applying an experimentally derived expression to the strain data that accounts for the constraining stress of overburden pressure, pore pressure, coal type, and gas type, two of the models were greatly improved. Introduction Coal seams have the capacity to adsorb large amounts of gases because of their typically large internal surface area (30 to 300 m2/g) (Berkowitz 1985). Some gases, such as CO2, have a higher affinity for the coal surfaces than others, such as N2. Knowledge of how the adsorption or desorption of gases affects coal permeability is important not only to operations involving the production of natural gas from coalbeds but also to the design and operation of projects to sequester greenhouse gases in coalbeds (RECOPOL Workshop 2005). As reservoir pressure is lowered, gas molecules are desorbed from the matrix and travel to the cleat (natural-fracture) system, where they are conveyed to producing wells. Fluid movement in coal is controlled by diffusion in the coal matrix and described by Darcy flow in the fracture (cleat) system. Because diffusion of gases through the matrix is a much slower process than Darcy flow through the fracture (cleat) system, coal seams are treated as fractured reservoirs with respect to fluid flow. However, coalbeds are more complex than other fractured reservoirs because of their ability to adsorb (or desorb) large quantities of gas. Adsorption of gases by the internal surfaces of coal causes the coal matrix to swell, and desorption of gases causes the coal matrix to shrink. The swelling or shrinkage of coal as gas is adsorbed or desorbed is referred to as sorption-induced strain. Sorption-induced strain of the coal matrix causes a change in the width of the cleats or fractures that must be accounted for when modeling permeability changes in the system. A number of permeability-change models (Gray 1987; Sawyer et al. 1990; Seidle and Huitt 1995; Palmer and Mansoori 1998; Pekot and Reeves 2003; Shi and Durucan 2003) for coal have been proposed that attempt to account for the effect of sorption-induced strain. Accurate measurement of sorption-induced strain becomes important when modeling the effect of gas sorption on coal permeability. For this work, laboratory measurements of sorption-induced strain were made for two different coals and three gases. Permeability measurements also were made using the same coals and gases under different pressure and stress regimes. The objective of this current work is to present these data and to model the laboratory-generated permeability data using a number of permeability-change models that have been described by other researchers. This work should be of value to those who model coalbed-methane fields with reservoir simulators because these results could be incorporated into those reservoir models to improve their accuracy.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Manab Mukherjee ◽  
Anamita Sikdar ◽  
Santanu Misra

<p>Adsorptive gas transport (such as CO<sub>2</sub>) in subsurface through coal matrix alters the dimension of pores and cleats and results in reduction of coal formation permeability. We propose thermal-cracking could be a potential method to increase the coal-permeability. We tested a number of coal samples from Bansgara colliery, India and compared the permeability and strength of the air-dried vs. thermally-cracked samples. Samples were heated at 280°C for 36 hours and then quickly chilled to produce thermal-cracks mostly along the bedding planes, which were confirmed by microscopic study. We tested the mechanical strength keeping the bedding planes perpendicular (α=90°) and parallel (α=0°) to the loading directions.</p><p>The peak compressive strengths of air-dried samples from room to 15 MPa confinement were noted as 14-44 MPa and 12-37 MPa for α=90° and 0° conditions, respectively. The mechanical behavior of the thermally-cracked samples, interestingly, was not straight forward. The peak compressive strengths of thermally-cracked samples were comparable to those of air-dried samples when α=90°. Interestingly, when α=0°, the peak-strength dropped by 82% at room pressures and 67% at 15 MPa confining pressures with respect to the air-dried samples under similar conditions.  The stress strain profile of the deforming coal samples showed initial shallow slopes indicating pore closure, and then a steep slope in the elastic limit. Most of the samples were brittle and failed at the yield point. Few samples showed slight ductile signatures and plastic flow at higher confinements. Axial splitting was observed in samples at low confinements. At higher confinements, fracture pattern was more dominated by shear cracks as compared to tensile cracks. Our results also show that porosity of the samples increases by 30-35%. Gas permeability (N<sub>2</sub> used as a probing gas) of the thermally cracked samples at 6.5 MPa confining pressure and 1 MPa pore pressures are 1.31 and 4 md for α=90° and 0° conditions, respectively. Permeability of air-dried samples at similar experimental conditions are 0.2 and 0.7 md for α=90° and 0° conditions, respectively.</p><p>We interpret that the loading sub-parallel thermal-cracks further opened and connected each-other during loading and therefore failed at lower stresses when α=0°. The interconnected pore and cleat network also resulted in permeability enhancement. Interlocking network of coal matrix resist the deformation of coal, and thermal cracks penetrate in coal matrix to reduce the entanglement of macerals in coal and lower its mechanical strength. In contrary, under α=90° loading conditions, the horizontal thermal cracks closed due to perpendicular load rather than opening further, and thus in those samples the strength reduction is less prominent. We conclude that thermal-cracking is a prospective method in enhancing the subsurface coal-permeability of deep-seated coal seams from micro to millidarcy. However, it must be ensured that the load imparted by the wellbore (injecting or recovery wells) on thermally cracked coal reservoir should act perpendicular to its bedding.</p>


2019 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 313-327
Author(s):  
Haijun Guo ◽  
Kai Wang ◽  
Yuanping Cheng ◽  
Liang Yuan ◽  
Chao Xu

Abstract Mining is a dynamic fracture process of coal and/or rock. The structural failure of coal bodies will change the coal matrix-fracture characteristics and then affect the distribution characteristics of the coalbed methane (CBM). Because of the structural complexity of coal, the coal matrices and fractures will be assumed to the geometries with rule shapes when the gas seepage characteristics in coals are analyzed. The size of the simplified geometries is the equivalent scale of dual-porosity coal structures (i.e. the equivalent fracture width and equivalent matrix scale). In this paper, according to the reasonable assumptions with regarding to dual-porosity coal structures, a new coal permeability evolution model based on the equivalent characteristics of dual-porosity structure (ECDP model) was built and the effect of the equivalent characteristics of dual-porosity structure on the coal permeability evolution law was analyzed. It is observed that if the initial fracture porosity is constant and the equivalent matrix scale increases, the range in which the permeability of coal rises with rising gas pressure increases; if the equivalent fracture width decreases and the equivalent matrix scale is constant, the range in which the permeability of coal rises with rising gas pressure decreases. The ECDP model is more suitable for revealing the evolution law of the coal permeability when large deformations occur in the coal bodies and/or the coal structure is damaged irreversibly, especially during enhancing CBM recovery.


Geofluids ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 ◽  
pp. 1-12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lei Zhang ◽  
Zhiwei Ye ◽  
Mengqian Huang ◽  
Cun Zhang

The coal permeability is known to be influenced by the pore pressure and effective stress in coal mines. In this study, the characteristics of the bituminous coal permeability response to the pore pressure and effective shear stress in the Xutuan coal mine in Huaibei Coalfield in China were investigated under different stress conditions. For this purpose, gas seepage tests with various stress levels were conducted via the original gas flow and displacement testing apparatus using bituminous coal samples from the Xutuan coal mine. The pore pressure effect on the permeability under different stress conditions was assessed by varying the pore pressure in coal samples and simulating different in situ stresses. The axial and radial pressures were controlled to study the response of coal permeability to the effective shear stress. The experimental results revealed that with an increase in pore pressure, the permeability of coal in different stress environments firstly drops and then rises. The permeability increased gradually with the effective shear stress, which trend became more pronounced when the effective shear stress exceeded zero. In case of the axial pressure exceeding the radial one, the cross shear slip was observed, for which the permeability of coal samples increased with the effective shear stress. In the opposite case, the separated shear slip was observed, with the reverse trend.


2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
Xiaoyan Ni ◽  
Peng Gong ◽  
Yi Xue

Understanding the influence of temperature on the gas seepage of coal seams is helpful to achieve the efficient extraction of underground coal seam gas. Thermal coal-gas interactions involve a series of complex interactions between gas and solid coal. Although the interactions between coal and gas have been studied thoroughly, few studies have considered the temperature evolution characteristics of coal seam gas extraction under the condition of variable temperature because of the complexity of the temperature effect on gas drainage. In this study, the fully coupled transient model combines the relationship of gas flow, heat transfer, coal mass deformation, and gas migration under variable temperature conditions and represents an important nonlinear response to gas migration caused by the change of effective stress. Then, this complex model is implemented into a finite element (FE) model and solved through the numerical method. Its reliability was verified by comparing with historical data. Finally, the effect of temperature on coal permeability and gas pressure is studied. The results reveal that the gas pressure in coal fracture is generally higher than that in the matrix blocks. The higher temperature of the coal seam induces the faster increase of the gas pressure. Temperature has a great effect on the gas seepage behavior in the coal seams.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document