scholarly journals Temporal response properties of the auditory nerve: Data from human cochlear-implant recipients

2012 ◽  
Vol 285 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 46-57 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michelle L. Hughes ◽  
Erin E. Castioni ◽  
Jenny L. Goehring ◽  
Jacquelyn L. Baudhuin
2019 ◽  
Vol 380 ◽  
pp. 187-196 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sonia Tabibi ◽  
Andrea Kegel ◽  
Wai Kong Lai ◽  
Ian C. Bruce ◽  
Norbert Dillier

2005 ◽  
Vol 93 (1) ◽  
pp. 557-569 ◽  
Author(s):  
Annette M. Taberner ◽  
M. Charles Liberman

The availability of transgenic and mutant lines makes the mouse a valuable model for study of the inner ear, and a powerful window into cochlear function can be obtained by recordings from single auditory nerve (AN) fibers. This study provides the first systematic description of spontaneous and sound-evoked discharge properties of AN fibers in mouse, specifically in CBA/CaJ and C57BL/6 strains, both commonly used in auditory research. Response properties of 196 AN fibers from CBA/CaJ and 58 from C57BL/6 were analyzed, including spontaneous rates (SR), tuning curves, rate versus level functions, dynamic range, response adaptation, phase-locking, and the relation between SR and these response properties. The only significant interstrain difference was the elevation of high-frequency thresholds in C57BL/6. In general, mouse AN fibers showed similar responses to other mammals: sharpness of tuning increased with characteristic frequency, which ranged from 2.5 to 70 kHz; SRs ranged from 0 to 120 sp/s, and fibers with low SR (<1 sp/s) had higher thresholds, and wider dynamic ranges than fibers with high SR. Dynamic ranges for mouse high-SR fibers were smaller (<20 dB) than those seen in other mammals. Phase-locking was seen for tone frequencies <4 kHz. Maximum synchronization indices were lower than those in cat but similar to those found in guinea pig.


1987 ◽  
Vol 96 (1) ◽  
pp. 34-38 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard T. Miyamoto ◽  
D. Douglas Brown

Electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve in the profoundly deaf population through implanted cochlear prostheses has increased the need for reliable electrophysiologic assessment tools. We have recorded electrically evoked brainstem responses (EABRs) in 21 subjects who have received a 3M/House cochlear implant. Recordings have been made, both intraoperatively and postoperatively, in the laboratory setting. The recording technique, methods of stimulus artifact suppression, and results of our measurements are described. Clinical applications of this technology are suggested.


2018 ◽  
Vol 57 (11) ◽  
pp. 864-871
Author(s):  
Jan-Willem A. Wasmann ◽  
Ruben H. M. van Eijl ◽  
Huib Versnel ◽  
Gijsbert A. van Zanten

1983 ◽  
Vol 405 (1 Cochlear Pros) ◽  
pp. 114-121 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. Y. S. Kiang ◽  
E. M. Keithley ◽  
M. C. Liberman

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document