Cardiac Rehabilitation in Victoria: Developing an Evidence-Based, Standardised Program Using a Modified-Delphi Process

2019 ◽  
Vol 28 ◽  
pp. S359
Author(s):  
S. Cartledge
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Rehabilitation ◽  
Delphi Process ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Modified Delphi

scholarly journals LO41: The development of a standardized provincial massive hemorrhage protocol with a built-in continuous quality improvement framework

CJEM ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (S1) ◽  
pp. S21-S22
Author(s):  
C. Yeh ◽  
S. Cope ◽  
T. Thompson ◽  
S. McGilvray ◽  
A. Petrosoniak ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Improvement ◽  
Factor Viia ◽  
Stakeholder Analysis ◽  
Massive Hemorrhage ◽  
Delphi Process ◽  
Blood Component ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Process Measures ◽  
Modified Delphi ◽  
Working Groups

Background: Massive hemorrhage protocols (MHPs) streamline the complex logistics required for prompt care of the bleeding patient, but their uptake has been variable and few regions have a system to measure outcomes from these events. Aim Statement: We aim to implement a standardized MHP with uniform quality improvement (QI) metrics to increase uptake of evidence-based MHPs across 150-hospitals in Ontario between 2017 and 2021. Measures & Design: We performed ongoing PDSA cycles; 1) stakeholder analysis by surveying the Ontario Regional Blood Coordinating Network (ORBCoN), 2) problem characterization and Ishikawa analysis for key QI metrics based on areas of MHP variability in 150 Ontario hospitals using a web-based survey, 3) creation of a consensus MHP via a modified Delphi process, 4) problem characterization at ORBCoN for the design of a freely available toolkit for provincial implementation by expert working groups, 5) design of 8 key QI metrics by a modified Delphi process, and 6) identification of process measures for QI data collection by implementation metrics. Evaluation/Results: PDSA1-2; 150-hospitals were surveyed. 33% of hospitals lacked MHPs, mostly in smaller sites. Major areas for QI were related to activation criteria, hemostatic agents, protocolized hypothermia management, variable MHP naming, QI metrics and serial blood work requirements. PDSA3; 3 Delphi rounds were held to reach 100% expert consensus for 42 statements and 8 CQI metrics. Major areas for modification were protocol name, laboratory resuscitation targets, cooler configurations, and role of factor VIIa. PDSA4; adaptable toolkit is under development by the steering committee and expert working groups. Implementation is scheduled for Spring 2020. PDSA5; the 8 CQI metrics are: TXA administration < 1 h, RBC transfusion < 15 min, call to transfer for definitive care < 60 min, temp >35°C at end of protocol, Hgb kept between 60-110g/L, transition to group-specific RBC by 90 min, appropriate activation defined by ≥6 units RBC in the first 24 hours, and any blood component wastage. Discussion/Impact: MHP uptake, content, and tracking is variable. A standardized MHP that is adaptable to diverse settings decreases complexity, improves use of evidence-based practices, and provides a platform for continuous QI. PDSA6 will occur after implementation; we will complete an implementation survey, and design a pilot and feasibility study for prospective tracking of patient outcomes using existing prospectively collected inter-hospital and provincial databases.

scholarly journals An Assessment Framework for e-Mental Health Apps in Canada: Results of a Modified Delphi Process (Preprint)

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer Zelmer ◽  
Krystle van Hoof ◽  
MaryAnn Notarianni ◽  
Trevor van Mierlo ◽  
Megan Schellenberg ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Delphi Process ◽  
Security And Privacy ◽  
Rapid Review ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Assessment Framework ◽  
Health Apps ◽  
Modified Delphi ◽  
Mapping Process ◽  
Guiding Principles

BACKGROUND The number of e-mental health apps is increasing rapidly. Studies have shown that the use of some apps is beneficial, whereas others are ineffective or do not meet users’ privacy expectations. Individuals and organizations that curate, recommend, host, use, or pay for apps have an interest in categorizing apps according to the consensus criteria of usability and effectiveness. Others have previously published recommendations for assessing health-related apps; however, the extent to which these recommendations can be generalized across different population groups (eg, culture, gender, and language) remains unclear. This study describes an attempt by Canadian stakeholders to develop an e-mental health assessment framework that responds to the unique needs of people living in Canada in an evidence-based manner. OBJECTIVE The objective of our study was to achieve consensus from a broad group of Canadian stakeholders on guiding principles and criteria for a framework to assess e-mental health apps in Canada. METHODS We developed an initial set of guiding principles and criteria from a rapid review and environmental scan of pre-existing app assessment frameworks. The initial list was refined through a two-round modified Delphi process. Participants (N=25) included app developers and users, health care providers, mental health advocates, people with lived experience of a mental health problem or mental illness, policy makers, and researchers. Consensus on each guideline or criterion was defined a priori as at least 70% agreement. The first round of voting was conducted electronically. Prior to Round 2 voting, in-person presentations from experts and a persona empathy mapping process were used to explore the perspectives of diverse stakeholders. RESULTS Of all respondents, 68% (17/25) in Round 1 and 100% (13/13) in Round 2 agreed that a framework for evaluating health apps is needed to help Canadian consumers identify high-quality apps. Consensus was reached on 9 guiding principles: evidence based, gender responsive, culturally appropriate, user centered, risk based, internationally aligned, enabling innovation, transparent and fair, and based on ethical norms. In addition, 15 informative and evaluative criteria were defined to assess the effectiveness, functionality, clinical applicability, interoperability, usability, transparency regarding security and privacy, security or privacy standards, supported platforms, targeted users, developers’ transparency, funding transparency, price, user desirability, user inclusion, and meaningful inclusion of a diverse range of communities. CONCLUSIONS Canadian mental health stakeholders reached the consensus on a framework of 9 guiding principles and 15 criteria important in assessing e-mental health apps. What differentiates the Canadian framework from other scales is explicit attention to user inclusion at all stages of the development, gender responsiveness, and cultural appropriateness. Furthermore, an empathy mapping process markedly influenced the development of the framework. This framework may be used to inform future mental health policies and programs.

scholarly journals Development of standardised programme content for phase II cardiac rehabilitation programmes in Australia using a modified Delphi process

BMJ Open ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (12) ◽  
pp. e032279
Author(s):  
Susie Cartledge ◽  
Emma Thomas ◽  
Kerry Hollier ◽  
R Maddison
Keyword(s):  
Literature Review ◽  
Cardiac Rehabilitation ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Health Professionals ◽  
Best Practice ◽  
Health Knowledge ◽  
Delphi Process ◽  
Median Score ◽  
Modified Delphi ◽  
Programme Content

ObjectiveTo develop standardised programme content for Australian phase II cardiac rehabilitation (CR) programme.DesignUsing the RAND/UCLA appropriateness method (RAM), a two-phase process including a comprehensive literature review and a two round modified Delphi process was undertaken to develop and validate content of a standardised CR programmes.ParticipantsAn invited multidisciplinary expert advisory group (EAG; n=16), including CR health professionals (nurses, allied health professionals, cardiologist), academics, policy makers, representation from the Australian Cardiovascular Health and Rehabilitation Association and consumers, provided oversight of the literature review and assisted with development of best practice statements. Twelve members of the EAG went onto participate in the modified Delphi process rating the necessity of statements in two rounds on a scale of 1 (not necessary) to 9 (essential).Main outcome measureBest practice statements that achieved a median score of ≥8 on a nine-point scale were categorised as ‘essential’; statements that achieved a median score of ≥6 were categorised as ‘desirable’ and statements with a median score of <6 were omitted.Results49 best practice statements were developed from the literature across ten areas of care within four module domains (CR foundations, developing heart health knowledge, psychosocial health and life beyond CR). At the end of a two-round validation process a total of 47 best practice statements were finalised; 29 statements were rated as essential, 18 as desirable and 2 statements were omitted.ConclusionsFor the first time in Australia, an evidence-based and consensus-led standardised programme content for phase II CR has been developed that can be provided to CR coordinators.

scholarly journals A63 REFINING THE CANADIAN ASSOCIATION OF GASTROENTEROLOGY GUIDELINE ON SCREENING IN PERSONS WITH A FAMILY HISTORY OF NONHEREDITARY COLORECTAL CANCER OR ADENOMA: A MODIFIED DELPHI PROCESS

2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 22-23
Author(s):  
J Tinmouth ◽  
A Paramalingam ◽  
A Bellini ◽  
M Cotterchio ◽  
E Dekker ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Family History ◽  
Expert Panel ◽  
Screening Program ◽  
Delphi Process ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Screening Programs ◽  
Crc Screening ◽  
Modified Delphi ◽  
Canadian Association

Abstract Background In 2018, the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology (CAG) published an extensive systematic review and guideline on screening in persons with a family history (FHx) of nonhereditary colorectal cancer (CRC) and adenoma. While CAG’s recommendations were evidence-based, some recommendations lacked precision (e.g. ranges for some start ages & intervals) and screening cessation age was not addressed, leading to implementation challenges for practitioners and CRC screening programs. Aims To review and update the evidence since the 2018 guideline and to formulate implementable recommendations in the Ontario context that are aligned with the CAG guideline. Methods ColonCancerCheck (Ontario’s organized CRC screening program) conducted a modified version of the literature search used by CAG (Jan 2017 - Sept 2019). A 19-member expert panel with Canadian and international representatives from endoscopy, primary care, epidemiology, organized CRC screening programs, Ontario’s cancer system and the general public refined the recommendations of the CAG guideline for the purposes of implementation in an organized CRC screening program using a modified Delphi process. This iterative process involved a series of webinars and anonymous survey rounds where the panel reviewed evidence materials and provided online feedback to develop, refine & achieve consensus on screening recommendations in persons with a FHx of CRC/adenoma. Consensus was achieved if ≥75% of members agreed or strongly agreed with the statement. Results Six new systematic reviews and 2 new guidelines were identified. New evidence included data on the absolute risk (10 year & lifetime risk) of CRC by type of FHx, as well as the performance of fecal immunochemical testing (FIT) and barriers to CRC screening in persons with a FHx of CRC. The expert panel participated in 3 webinars and 4 online surveys to arrive at consensus. Panel recommendations and level of consensus will be reported for the 6 statements (Table). Conclusions Building from the CAG guideline, we derived evidence-based and implementable recommendations for screening persons with a FHx of CRC or adenoma. Funding Agencies Ontario Health (Cancer Care Ontario)

scholarly journals Using the Delphi Approach to Identify Priority Areas for Health Visiting Practice in an Area of Deprivation

2013 ◽  
Vol 2013 ◽  
pp. 1-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rosamund Bryar ◽  
Sandra Anto-Awuakye ◽  
Janice Christie ◽  
Claire Davis ◽  
Karen Plumb
Keyword(s):  
Delphi Process ◽  
Health Needs ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Consultation Process ◽  
Social Challenges ◽  
Modified Delphi ◽  
Delphi Approach ◽  
Health Visitors ◽  
The Uk ◽  
High Level

Families with children living in areas of high deprivation face multiple health and social challenges, and this high level of need has impacts on the work of health practitioners working in such areas. All families in the UK with children under five years have access to health visiting services, and health visitors have a key role in mitigating the effects of deprivation by addressing health needs through evidence based practice. This paper reports the first stage of a project in Tower Hamlets, London, an area of significant deprivation, which aims to develop an evidence-based toolkit to support health visitors in their practice with families. The first stage used a modified Delphi process to identify the priority health needs of families in the area between June and July 2012. The three-stage Delphi process involved 25 people: four health visitors, four other members of the health visiting service, and 17 representatives of other services working with families. A focus group event was followed by a second event where individuals completed a questionnaire ranking the 27 priorities identified in the first event. The consultation process concluded with participants completing a second questionnaire, by email, confirming or changing their prioritisation of the topics.

Nutrition in Primary Health Care: Using a Delphi Process To Design New Interdisciplinary Services

2006 ◽  
Vol 67 (S1) ◽  
pp. S14-S29 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paula Brauer ◽  
Linda Dietrich ◽  
Bridget Davidson ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Health Care ◽  
Health Care Providers ◽  
Administrative Support ◽  
Care Service ◽  
Delphi Process ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Modified Delphi ◽  
Nutrition Services ◽  
Key Features

Purpose: A modified Delphi process was used to identify key features of interdisciplinary nutrition services, including provider roles and responsibilities for Ontario Family Health Networks (FHNs), a family physician-based type of primary care. Methods: Twenty-three representatives from interested professional organizations, including three FHN demonstration sites, completed a modified Delphi process. Participants reviewed evidence from a systematic literature review, a patient survey, a costing analysis, and key informant interview results before undertaking the Delphi process. Statements describing various options for services were developed at an in-person meeting, which was followed by two rounds of e-mail questionnaires. Teleconference discussions were held between rounds. Results: An interdisciplinary model with differing and complementary roles for health care providers emerged from the process. Additional key features addressing screening for nutrition problems, health promotion and disease prevention, team collaboration, planning and evaluation, administrative support, access to care, and medical directives/delegated acts were identified. Under the proposed model, the registered dietitian is the team member responsible for managing all aspects of nutrition services, from needs assessment to program delivery, as well as for supporting all providers’ nutrition services. Conclusions: The proposed interdisciplinary nutrition services model merits evaluation of cost, effectiveness, applicability, and sustainability in team-based primary care service settings.

Identifying the capabilities most important for veterinary employability using a modified Delphi process

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Melinda A. Bell ◽  
Martin A. Cake ◽  
Laura T. King ◽  
Caroline F. Mansfield
Keyword(s):  
Delphi Process ◽  
Modified Delphi

scholarly journals Development of an explicit tool assessing potentially inappropriate medication use in Hong Kong elder patients

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Huanyu Zhang ◽  
Eliza LY Wong ◽  
Eng-kiong Yeoh ◽  
Bosco HM Ma
Keyword(s):  
Hong Kong ◽  
Inappropriate Medication ◽  
Delphi Process ◽  
Potentially Inappropriate Medication ◽  
Medical Conditions ◽  
Modified Delphi ◽  
Adverse Health Outcomes ◽  
Elder Patients ◽  
Prescribing Quality ◽  
Prescribing Practice

Abstract Background Potentially inappropriate medication (PIM) use has adverse effects on health, particularly in elder patients. Various country-specific explicit criteria have been developed to measure the appropriateness of prescribing worldwide. However, it is difficult to apply the criteria developed from other regions to measure and guide the local prescribing practice in Hong Kong. This study aims to develop a Hong Kong-specific PIM assessing tool from previously published criteria and validate this tool using the modified Delphi method. Methods A disease-oriented Hong Kong-specific preliminary PIM list was developed based on nine sets of reference criteria selected from a literature review. Any medication or medication class appeared in at least two sets of the reference criteria as well as its related medical conditions were selected as PIM candidates. After examining the availability of PIM candidates by the Hong Kong Hospital Authority drug formulary, the Hong Kong-specific preliminary PIM list was validated by a two-round of modified Delphi process. Eight experts from different specialties were invited to rate the degree of inappropriateness of each PIM candidate using a five-point Likert scale. The experts were also encouraged to propose therapeutic alternatives and new PIM candidates not covered by the preliminary PIM list. The PIM candidates that the expert panel didn’t reach consensus on were excluded from the final Hong Kong-specific PIM list. Results After two rounds of the Delphi process, eight PIM candidates remained questionable and thus were excluded from the PIM list. The final Hong Kong-specific PIM list included a total of 164 statements applicable to older adults aged 65 years or above, among which 77 were under PIMs independent of diagnoses, and 87 were under PIMs considering specific medical conditions. Conclusions The Hong Kong-specific PIM list can be used as a quality measure and an educational tool to improve the local prescribing quality. Further studies should validate its association with adverse health outcomes in clinical and research settings.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document