Antihypertensive drug class in combination with lipid lowering treatment for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease in the elderly

Heart & Lung ◽  
2022 ◽  
Vol 51 ◽  
pp. 40-45
Author(s):  
Zhen Zhou ◽  
Enayet K. Chowdhury ◽  
Monique Breslin ◽  
Andrea J. Curtis ◽  
Christopher M Reid ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
Isabel Aguilar-Palacio ◽  
María José Rabanaque ◽  
Lina Maldonado ◽  
Armando Chaure ◽  
José María Abad-Díez ◽  
...  

The objective of this study was to analyse persistence to lipid-lowering drug use for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease (CVD) in a new users cohort, to explore all-cause and cardiovascular related morbidity, comorbidity and mortality in this group and, finally, to study the relationship between persistence and morbimortality. We selected subjects who started lipid-lowering treatment for primary prevention of CVD between 1 January 2010 and 31 December 2017 (N = 1424), and classified them as treatment-persistent or -nonpersistent. Bivariate analyses were performed to compare sociodemographic and clinical variables, morbimortality and time to event between groups. The association between morbidities was explored using comorbidity network analysis. The effect of persistence was analysed using logistic regression and Cox survival analyses. Only 38.7% of users were persistent with treatment. Persistent and nonpersistent users had similar sociodemographic and clinical profiles, although differed in age, smoking status, and glycemia. Comorbidity networks revealed that the number of co-occurring diagnoses was higher in nonpersistent than persistent users. Adjusted analyses indicated a protective effect of treatment persistence, especially against major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), but this effect was not statistically significant. Observational studies are crucial to characterize real-world effectiveness.


2020 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
pp. 204800402094932
Author(s):  
Jack Stewart ◽  
Katherine Addy ◽  
Sarah Campbell ◽  
Peter Wilkinson

Cardiovascular disease remains a substantial concern in terms of global mortality and morbidity, while prevalence of cardiovascular disease is increasing as treatment modalities improve survival. With an ageing population and increasing costs of chronic medical care, primary prevention of cardiovascular disease is an important target for healthcare providers. Since the previous iteration of this paper, new international guidelines have been produced regarding hypertension and lipid lowering therapies, whilst there is a growing body of evidence and new therapies emerging in other areas of lifestyle and pharmacotherapeutic intervention. This review outlines emerging evidence in the field and compares and contrasts contemporary recommendations from European and American guidelines.


2018 ◽  
Vol 45 (02) ◽  
pp. 157-163 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elisa Danese ◽  
Emmanuel Favaloro ◽  
Giuseppe Lippi

AbstractAspirin is one of the most often used drugs for prevention and treatment of a variety of thrombotic disorders. This narrative review aims to provide an overview of evidence highlighting potential benefits and relative harms of aspirin in primary prevention of cardiovascular disease. The authors summarize key findings of the ASPirin in Reducing Events in the Elderly (ASPREE) Investigator Group randomized trial and also provide a comparative overview of recent meta-analyses. Overall, all-cause mortality was largely heterogeneous, with some meta-analyses showing a modestly decreased risk in patients taking aspirin, with others reporting no effects, but the ASPREE Investigator Group trial evidencing 14% higher risk. Regarding cardiovascular disease, the most favorable impact could be noted for major adverse cardiovascular events, with most meta-analyses reporting a decreased risk in people receiving aspirin. Conversely, the ASPREE Investigator Group trial demonstrated no significant impact of aspirin on risk of cardiovascular mortality or ischemic stroke. A modest favorable effect of aspirin in decreasing the risk of myocardial infarction was noted in two meta-analyses, but not in other reports or in the ASPREE Investigator Group trial. Furthermore, one meta-analysis reported a lower risk of future cancer, others failed to report a significant effect, and the ASPREE Investigator Group trial reported a 31% increased risk. Unlike these conflicting outcomes, the bleeding risk of patients receiving aspirin was found to be consistently enhanced in all reports reviewed. These recent findings would lead us to conclude that the harms of aspirin in primary prevention of cardiovascular disease may be larger than the benefits, especially in the elderly general population.


2016 ◽  
Vol 31 (1) ◽  
pp. 24-32 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Blair Sarbacker ◽  
Kathleen A. Lusk ◽  
Lauren A. Flieller ◽  
Jeffrey R. Van Liew

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (5) ◽  
pp. 326-327
Author(s):  
Mattia Galli ◽  
Felicita Andreotti ◽  
Domenico D’Amario ◽  
Rocco Vergallo ◽  
Rocco A Montone ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document