Why college students procrastinate in online courses: A self-regulated learning perspective

2021 ◽  
pp. 100807
Author(s):  
Sheng-Lun Cheng ◽  
Kui Xie
Keyword(s):  
College Students ◽  
Online Courses ◽  
Self Regulated Learning ◽  
Regulated Learning

scholarly journals College Students’ Multitasking Behavior in Online Versus Face-to-Face Courses

SAGE Open ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 215824401882450 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew Lepp ◽  
Jacob E. Barkley ◽  
Aryn C. Karpinski ◽  
Shweta Singh
Keyword(s):  
College Students ◽  
Internet Addiction ◽  
Self Efficacy ◽  
Online Courses ◽  
Negatively Associated ◽  
Face To Face ◽  
Self Regulated Learning ◽  
Regulated Learning ◽  
Age And Sex ◽  
Pedagogical Methods

This study compared college students’ multitasking in online courses with their multitasking in face-to-face courses and explored the significance of potential predictors of multitasking in each setting. Students taking both online and face-to-face courses completed surveys assessing multitasking in each setting, self-efficacy for self-regulated learning (SE:SRL), Internet addiction, multitasking tendency, age, and sex. Multitasking was significantly greater in online than face-to-face courses. Internet addiction was positively associated with multitasking in online and face-to-face courses. Multitasking tendency was positively and age was negatively associated with multitasking during online courses only; SE:SRL was negatively associated with multitasking during face-to-face courses only. In conclusion, multitasking was greatest during online courses. Furthermore, there were different sets of predictors for students’ multitasking in online courses compared with face-to-face courses. This implies that multitasking in online and face-to-face courses are different phenomena and therefore may require different pedagogical methods to successfully minimize multitasking behaviors.

Preparing Online Learning Readiness with Learner-Content Interaction

2016 ◽  
pp. 586-614
Author(s):  
Juhong Christie Liu ◽  
Elaine Roberts Kaye
Keyword(s):  
Online Learning ◽  
Learning Environments ◽  
Online Courses ◽  
Learning Readiness ◽  
Self Regulated Learning ◽  
Regulated Learning ◽  
Content Interaction ◽  
Online Learning Readiness ◽  
Synchronous Online

Online learning readiness is fundamental to student successful participation, presence, and interaction in online courses. Effective facilitation of these key components depends on sound instructional design. In self-directed online environments, learner-content interaction and scaffolding self-regulated learning have been found of primary importance to generate meaningful learning. To provide a solution to the challenges of interoperability of various functions in synchronous online learning environments, this chapter presents a case study about the design and development of a self-paced orientation to help students acquire online learning readiness. Learner-content interaction is strategically utilized in the design to scaffold self-regulated learning. The results of the case study demonstrate that this orientation positively prepares students to be ready for learning in a synchronous online environment. The approach can be of practical use to individuals and groups.

Learning in the Face of Digital Distractions

2022 ◽  
pp. 120-142
Author(s):  
Anna C. Brady ◽  
Yeo-eun Kim ◽  
Jacqueline von Spiegel
Keyword(s):  
College Students ◽  
Learning Process ◽  
College Instructors ◽  
Instructional Approaches ◽  
Self Regulated Learning ◽  
Regulated Learning ◽  
Academic Settings ◽  
The Face ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Support Students

Digital distractions are an important and prevalent aspect of college students' lives. Using a self-regulated learning perspective, this chapter provides an in-depth understanding of students' digital distractions in academic settings and highlights how college instructors can empower their students to manage digital distractions and self-regulate their own learning. In particular, the chapter discusses both the causes and consequences of engaging in digital distractions with a focus on the impact of multitasking. In addition, the chapter argues that students' engagement in digital distractions is closely connected to their motivation and emotions. This chapter highlights how college students can regulate their digital distractions throughout the learning process during each phase of self-regulated learning. Finally, the chapter reviews the ways college instructors can support students' management of distractions through their instructional approaches.

scholarly journals Supporting learners' self-regulated learning in Massive Open Online Courses

2020 ◽  
Vol 146 ◽  
pp. 103771 ◽  
Author(s):  
Renée S. Jansen ◽  
Anouschka van Leeuwen ◽  
Jeroen Janssen ◽  
Rianne Conijn ◽  
Liesbeth Kester
Keyword(s):  
Online Courses ◽  
Massive Open Online Courses ◽  
Massive Open Online ◽  
Self Regulated Learning ◽  
Regulated Learning

The Application of Web and Educational Technologies in Supporting Web-Enabled Self-Regulated Learning in Different Computing Course Orientations

2011 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 70-79 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chia-Wen Tsai ◽  
Pei-Di Shen
Keyword(s):  
Online Courses ◽  
Database Management System ◽  
Educational Institutions ◽  
Web Based ◽  
Face To Face ◽  
Self Regulated Learning ◽  
Packaged Software ◽  
Regulated Learning ◽  
Computing Skills ◽  
The Face

Many educational institutions provide online courses; however, the question whether they can be as effective as those offered in the face-to-face classroom format still exists. In addition, it also remains unclear whether every subject is appropriate to be delivered in web-based learning environments. Thus, the authors redesigned two courses with different orientations and conducted a quasi-experiment to examine the effects of web-enabled self-regulated learning (SRL) in different course orientations on students’ computing skills. Four classes with 173 students from the courses ‘Database Management System’ and ‘Packaged Software and Application’ were divided into 2 (Design-oriented vs. Procedural-oriented) × 2 (SRL vs. non-SRL) experimental groups. The results showed that students who received the intervention of web-enabled SRL had significantly higher grades on the examination for certificates than those that did not receive this intervention, whether in design-oriented or procedural-oriented computing courses. Moreover, students in the two different courses had very similar scores, which resulted in non-significant differences in their end-of-term computing skills.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document