Epitope-based in silico peptide design yields peptide-directed antibodies that recognize the buffalo luteinizing hormone

2021 ◽  
Vol 176 ◽  
pp. 260-271
Author(s):  
Varij Nayan ◽  
Suneel Kumar Onteru ◽  
Dheer Singh
RSC Advances ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (7) ◽  
pp. 3816-3826
Author(s):  
Yogesh Badhe ◽  
Rakesh Gupta ◽  
Beena Rai

The protocol for peptide design and testing for its usage as a sensor.


2018 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
William F. Porto ◽  
Luz Irazazabal ◽  
Eliane S. F. Alves ◽  
Suzana M. Ribeiro ◽  
Carolina O. Matos ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zahra Sadat Hashemi ◽  
Mahboubeh Zarei ◽  
Mohsen Karami Fath ◽  
Mahmoud Ganji ◽  
Mahboube Shahrabi Farahani ◽  
...  

Large contact surfaces of protein–protein interactions (PPIs) remain to be an ongoing issue in the discovery and design of small molecule modulators. Peptides are intrinsically capable of exploring larger surfaces, stable, and bioavailable, and therefore bear a high therapeutic value in the treatment of various diseases, including cancer, infectious diseases, and neurodegenerative diseases. Given these promising properties, a long way has been covered in the field of targeting PPIs via peptide design strategies. In silico tools have recently become an inevitable approach for the design and optimization of these interfering peptides. Various algorithms have been developed to scrutinize the PPI interfaces. Moreover, different databases and software tools have been created to predict the peptide structures and their interactions with target protein complexes. High-throughput screening of large peptide libraries against PPIs; “hotspot” identification; structure-based and off-structure approaches of peptide design; 3D peptide modeling; peptide optimization strategies like cyclization; and peptide binding energy evaluation are among the capabilities of in silico tools. In the present study, the most recent advances in the field of in silico approaches for the design of interfering peptides against PPIs will be reviewed. The future perspective of the field and its advantages and limitations will also be pinpointed.


2001 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
pp. 50-50
Author(s):  
S. F. Ge ◽  
M. N. Romanov ◽  
P. J. Sharp ◽  
D. W. Burt ◽  
I. R. Paton ◽  
...  

2000 ◽  
Vol 35 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 129-133
Author(s):  
B Gawronska ◽  
A Stepien ◽  
AJ Ziecik
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document