Experimental study of air–water two-phase flow in an 8×8 rod bundle under pool condition for one-dimensional drift-flux analysis

2012 ◽  
Vol 33 (1) ◽  
pp. 168-181 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shao-Wen Chen ◽  
Yang Liu ◽  
Takashi Hibiki ◽  
Mamoru Ishii ◽  
Yoshitaka Yoshida ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Experimental Study ◽  
Two Phase Flow ◽  
Flux Analysis ◽  
Phase Flow ◽  
Two Phase ◽  
One Dimensional ◽  
Drift Flux ◽  
Rod Bundle

One-dimensional drift-flux model for two-phase flow in pool rod bundle systems

2012 ◽  
Vol 40 ◽  
pp. 166-177 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shao-Wen Chen ◽  
Yang Liu ◽  
Takashi Hibiki ◽  
Mamoru Ishii ◽  
Yoshitaka Yoshida ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Two Phase Flow ◽  
Phase Flow ◽  
Two Phase ◽  
One Dimensional ◽  
Drift Flux Model ◽  
Drift Flux ◽  
Rod Bundle ◽  
Flux Model

Void fraction prediction and one-dimensional drift-flux analysis for horizontal two-phase flow in different pipe sizes

2018 ◽  
Vol 99 ◽  
pp. 433-445 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ran Kong ◽  
Qingzi Zhu ◽  
Seungjin Kim ◽  
Mamoru Ishii ◽  
Stephen Bajorek ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Void Fraction ◽  
Two Phase Flow ◽  
Flux Analysis ◽  
Phase Flow ◽  
Two Phase ◽  
One Dimensional ◽  
Drift Flux

scholarly journals Correction to: One-dimensional drift-flux correlations for two-phase flow in medium-size channels

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takashi Hibiki
Keyword(s):  
Open Access ◽  
Two Phase Flow ◽  
Medium Size ◽  
Phase Flow ◽  
Two Phase ◽  
One Dimensional ◽  
Open Access Publication ◽  
Internet Portal ◽  
Creative Commons ◽  
Drift Flux

The article “One-dimensional drift-flux correlations for two-phase flow in medium-size channels” written by Takashi Hibiki, was originally published electronically on the publisher’s internet portal (currently SpringerLink) on 17 April 2019 without open access. After publication in Volume 1, Issue 2, page 85–100, the author(s) decided to opt for Open Choice and to make the article an open access publication. Therefore, the copyright of the article has been changed to © The Author(s) 2020 and the article is forthwith distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, duplication, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

One-dimensional interfacial area transport for bubbly two-phase flow in vertical 5 × 5 rod bundle

2018 ◽  
Vol 72 ◽  
pp. 257-273 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hang Liu ◽  
Liang-ming Pan ◽  
Takashi Hibiki ◽  
Wen-xiong Zhou ◽  
Quan-yao Ren ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Two Phase Flow ◽  
Interfacial Area ◽  
Phase Flow ◽  
Two Phase ◽  
Interfacial Area Transport ◽  
One Dimensional ◽  
Rod Bundle

Drift-flux correlation for upward gas-liquid two-phase flow in vertical rod bundle flow channel

2020 ◽  
Vol 162 ◽  
pp. 120341
Author(s):  
Xu Han ◽  
Xiuzhong Shen ◽  
Toshihiro Yamamoto ◽  
Ken Nakajima ◽  
Takashi Hibiki
Keyword(s):  
Two Phase Flow ◽  
Flow Channel ◽  
Phase Flow ◽  
Two Phase ◽  
Drift Flux ◽  
Rod Bundle

ICONE11-36015 ONE-DIMENSIONAL DRIFT-FLUX MODEL FOR DOWNWARD TWO-PHASE FLOW

2003 ◽  
Vol 2003 (0) ◽  
pp. 214 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takashi HIBIKI ◽  
Hiroshi GODA ◽  
Seungjin KIM ◽  
Mamoru ISHII ◽  
Jennifer UHLE
Keyword(s):  
Two Phase Flow ◽  
Phase Flow ◽  
Two Phase ◽  
One Dimensional ◽  
Drift Flux Model ◽  
Drift Flux ◽  
Flux Model

Experimental Study on Resistance Characteristics in a 3 × 3 Rod Bundle

2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chaoxing Yan ◽  
Changqi Yan ◽  
Licheng Sun ◽  
Yang Wang
Keyword(s):  
Experimental Data ◽  
Experimental Study ◽  
Pressure Drop ◽  
Two Phase Flow ◽  
Phase Flow ◽  
Local Resistance ◽  
Local Pressure ◽  
Two Phase ◽  
Frictional Pressure Drop ◽  
Rod Bundle

Experimental study on resistance of air-water two-phase flow in a vertical 3 × 3 rod bundle was carried out under normal temperature and pressure. The rod diameter and pitch were 8 mm and 11 mm, respectively. The ranges of gas and liquid superficial velocity were 0.013∼3.763 m/s and 0.076∼1.792 m/s, respectively. The result indicated that the existing correlations for calculating frictional coefficient in the rod bundle and local resistance coefficient could not give favorable predictions on the single-phase experimental data. For the case of two-phase flow, eight correlations for calculating two-phase equivalent viscosity poorly predicted the frictional pressure drop, with the mean absolute errors around 60%. Meanwhile, the eight classical two-phase viscosity formulae were evaluated against the local pressure drop at spacer grid. It is shown that Dukler model predicted the experimental data well in the range of Rel<9000 while McAdams correlation was the best for Rel⩾9000. For all the experimental data, Dukler model provided the best prediction with MRE of 29.03%. Furthermore, approaches to calculate two-phase frictional pressure drop and local resistance were proposed by considering mass quality, two-phase Reynolds number and densities in homogenous flow model, resulting in a good agreement with the experimental data.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document