Utilizing carbon dioxide as a regenerative agent in methane dry reforming to improve hydrogen production and catalyst activity and longevity

2014 ◽  
Vol 39 (32) ◽  
pp. 18632-18641 ◽  
Author(s):  
Feraih Sh. Alenazey
Catalysts ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (10) ◽  
pp. 481 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anand Kumar

Methane dry reforming (MDR) is an attractive alternative to methane steam reforming for hydrogen production with low harmful environmental emissions on account of utilizing carbon dioxide in the feed. However, carbon formation in the product stream has been the most challenging aspect of MDR, as it leads to catalyst deactivation by coking, prevalent in hydrocarbon reforming reactions. Common strategies to limit coking have mainly targeted catalyst modifications, such as by doping with rare earth metals, supporting on refractory oxides, adding oxygen/steam in the feed, or operating at reaction conditions (e.g., higher temperature), where carbon formation is thermodynamically restrained. These methods do help in suppressing carbon formation; nonetheless, to a large extent, catalyst activity and product selectivity are also adversely affected. In this study, the effect of ammonia addition in MDR feed on carbon suppression is presented. Based on a thermodynamic equilibrium analysis, the most significant observation of ammonia addition is towards low temperature carbon dioxide activation to methane, along with carbon removal. Results indicate that ammonia not only helps in removing carbon formation, but also greatly enriches hydrogen production.


2014 ◽  
Vol 39 (30) ◽  
pp. 17009-17023 ◽  
Author(s):  
Muhammad Awais Naeem ◽  
Ahmed Sadeq Al-Fatesh ◽  
Anis Hamza Fakeeha ◽  
Ahmed Elhag Abasaeed

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 141-149 ◽  
Author(s):  
Moran Dahan ◽  
Eswaravara Komarala ◽  
Ludmila Fadeev ◽  
Ajay K. Chinnam ◽  
Avital Shlomovich ◽  
...  

Methane dry reforming presents a unique opportunity to simultaneously consume both methane and carbon dioxide and generate from them clean-burning synthetic fuels for mobile energy applications.


2014 ◽  
Vol 4 (5) ◽  
pp. 1340-1349 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. S. Aw ◽  
I. G. Osojnik Črnivec ◽  
A. Pintar

This work underlines the parametric tuning and mechanistic study for CeZr supported bimetallic NiCo in methane dry reforming with carbon dioxide.


Author(s):  
Nur Nabillah Mohd Arif ◽  
Dai-Viet N. Vo ◽  
Mohammad Tazli Azizan ◽  
Sumaiya Zainal Abidin

<p>Glycerol, byproduct from the biodiesel production can be effectively utilized as the promising source of synthesis gas (syngas) through a dry reforming reaction. Combination of these waste materials with greenhouse gases which is carbon dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>) will help to reduce environmental problem such as global warming. This dry reforming reaction has been carried out in a fixed bed batch reactor at 700 °C under the atmospheric pressure for 3 hours. In this experiment, reforming reaction was carried out using Nickel (Ni) as based catalyst and supported with zirconium (ZrO<sub>2</sub>) and calcium (CaO) oxides. The catalysts were prepared by wet impregnation method and characterized using Bruanaer-Emmett-Teller (BET) surface area, Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM), X-ray Diffraction (XRD), Thermo Gravimetric (TGA), and Temperature Programmed Reduction (TPR) analysis. Reaction studies show that 15% Ni/CaO give the highest hydrogen yield and glycerol conversion that peaked at 24.59% and 30.32%, respectively. This result is verified by XRD analysis where this catalyst shows low crystallinity and fine dispersion of Ni species resulted in high specific surface area which gives 44.93 m<sup>2</sup>/g that is validated by BET.  Copyright © 2016 BCREC GROUP. All rights reserved</p><p><em>Received: 21<sup>st</sup> January 2016; Revised: 24<sup>th</sup> February 2016; Accepted: 29<sup>th</sup> February 2016</em></p><p><strong>How to Cite:</strong> Arif, N.M.M., Vo, D.V.N., Azizan,M.T., Abidin S.Z. (2016). Carbon Dioxide Dry Reforming of Glycerol for Hydrogen Production using Ni/ZrO<sub>2</sub> and Ni/CaO as Catalysts. Bulletin of Chemical Reaction Engineering &amp; Catalysis, 11 (2): 200-209 (doi:10.9767/bcrec.11.2.551.200-209)</p><p><strong>Permalink/DOI:</strong> http://dx.doi.org/10.9767/bcrec.11.2.551.200-209</p>


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document