scholarly journals Optimization of the operating conditions for steam reforming of slow pyrolysis oil over an activated biochar-supported Ni–Co catalyst

Author(s):  
Christian Di Stasi ◽  
Marta Cortese ◽  
Gianluca Greco ◽  
Simona Renda ◽  
Belén González ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
Kyungpyo Hong ◽  
Stephanie Nadya Sutanto ◽  
Jeong A. Lee ◽  
Jongsup Hong

Ni–Rh and Ni–Co nano-scale alloys exhibit high methane conversion, hydrogen yield, resistance to carbon formation, and long-term stability at low temperatures, allowing them to cope with the various operating conditions of direct methane-fueled PCFCs.


Author(s):  
Joonguen Park ◽  
Shinku Lee ◽  
Sunyoung Kim ◽  
Joongmyeon Bae

This paper discusses a numerical analysis of the heat and mass transfer characteristics in an autothermal methane reformer. Assuming local thermal equilibrium between the bulk gas and the surface of the catalyst, a one-medium approach for the porous medium analysis was incorporated. Also, the mass transfer between the bulk gas and the catalyst’s surface was neglected due to the relatively low gas velocity. For the catalytic surface reaction, the Langmuir–Hinshelwood model was incorporated in which methane (CH4) is reformed to hydrogen-rich gases by the autothermal reforming (ATR) reaction. Full combustion, steam reforming, water-gas shift, and direct steam reforming reactions were included in the chemical reaction model. Mass, momentum, energy, and species balance equations were simultaneously calculated with the chemical reactions for the multiphysics analysis. By varying the four operating conditions (inlet temperature, oxygen to carbon ratio (OCR), steam to carbon ratio, and gas hourly space velocity (GHSV)), the performance of the ATR reactor was estimated by the numerical calculations. The SR reaction rate was improved by an increased inlet temperature. The reforming efficiency and the fuel conversion reached their maximum values at an OCR of 0.7. When the GHSV was increased, the reforming efficiency increased but the large pressure drop may decrease the system efficiency. From these results, we can estimate the optimal operating conditions for the production of large amounts of hydrogen from methane.


2001 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 141-148 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Yorgun ◽  
S. Şensöz ◽  
Ö.M. Koçkar
Keyword(s):  

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Abo . Zahra A.I ◽  
M.K. Abd El- Wahab ◽  
M.A. Tawfik

The target of the biomass co-pyrolysis is improvingthe heating value of the produced bio-products of a certain type of feedstock, besides disposal of more than one residue in the same time. Thus, this work aims to operate a local fabricated fixed-bed pyrolyzer to improve the pyrolytic gas yield produced by the ground pieces of three biomass residues namely Mango trees Pruning Logs (MPL), Sugarcane bagasse (SB) and Rice straw (RS) using an affordable slow pyrolysis technique. This work was carried out under slow pyrolysis conditions represented in final pyrolysis temperature of 400 °C, vapor residence time of 4 min, heating rate of 0.01-1 °C/s in full absence of oxygen. The pyrolytic gas production was assessed under different feedstock mixing ratios of (1:2:1), (1:1:2) and (2:1:1) as ratio of (RS: SB: MPL), particle lengths of 1-5, 10-15 and 20-25 mm, with and without sandy bed at the bottom of pyrolysis chamber as a fluidized bed. The obtained results showed that, using the fluidized fixed-bed pyrolyzer under slow co-pyrolysis conditions gave the optimum results where in, the pyrolytic gas concentration, gas yield, higher heating value of pyrolytic gasand energy conversion efficiency were 55%, 1.09 Nm3 /kg, 14.97 MJ/Nm3 and 85.43%, respectively, and 53.7%, 1.08 Nm3 /kg, 13.75 MJ/Nm3 ,77.71% in case of using the pyrolyzer without fluidized bed under the same operating conditions. So, the pyrolyzer with fluidized bed achieves an increment in the higher heating value and energy conversion efficiency by about 8.15% and 9.03%, respectivly over the pyrolyzer without fluidized bed.Furthermore, the cost per energy unit of pyrolytic gas produced by the fluidized bed pyrolyzer is lower than the common two fossil gaseous fuels of natural gas and LPG costs by about 28.57% and 80%, respectively.


2016 ◽  
Vol 41 (22) ◽  
pp. 9234-9244 ◽  
Author(s):  
L.F. Bobadilla ◽  
F. Romero-Sarria ◽  
M.A. Centeno ◽  
J.A. Odriozola

2021 ◽  
Vol 212 ◽  
pp. 106622 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahmed Tijani F. Afolabi ◽  
Panagiotis N. Kechagiopoulos ◽  
Yurong Liu ◽  
Chun-Zhu Li

Fuel ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 275 ◽  
pp. 118036 ◽  
Author(s):  
Haiyang Xu ◽  
Zhangfeng Shen ◽  
Gang Chen ◽  
Chaochuang Yin ◽  
Yanan Liu ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document