scholarly journals Infectious diseases and the use of antibiotics in outpatients at the emergency department of the University Hospital of León, Nicaragua

2009 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 349-354 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. den Engelsen ◽  
C. van der Werf ◽  
A.J. Matute ◽  
E. Delgado ◽  
C.A.M. Schurink ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Liptak ◽  
Peter Banovcin ◽  
Robert Rosolanka ◽  
Michal Prokopic ◽  
Ivan Kocan ◽  
...  

Background and aim: COVID-19 can be presented with various gastrointestinal symptoms. Shortly after the pandemic outbreak several machine learning algorithms have been implemented to assess new diagnostic and therapeutic methods for this disease. Aim of this study is to assess gas-trointestinal and liver related predictive factors for SARS-CoV-2 associated risk of hospitalization. Methods: Data collection was based on questionnaire from the COVID-19 outpatient test center and from the emergency department at the University hospital in combination with data from inter-nal hospital information system and from the mobile application used for telemedicine follow-up of patients. For statistical analysis SARS-CoV-2 negative patients were considered as controls to three different SARS-CoV-2 positive patient groups (divided based on severity of the disease). Results: Total of 710 patients were enrolled in the study. Presence of diarrhea and nausea was significantly higher in emergency department group than in the COVID-19 outpatient test center. Among liver enzymes only aspartate transaminase (AST) has been significantly elevated in the hospitalized group compared to patients discharged home. Based on random forest algorithm, AST has been identified as the most important predictor followed by age or diabetes mellitus. Diarrhea and bloating have also predictive importance although much lower than AST. Conclusion: SARS-CoV-2 positivity is connected with isolated AST elevation and the level is linked with the severity of the disease. Furthermore, using machine learning random forest algo-rithm, we have identified elevated AST as the most important predictor for COVID-19 related hos-pitalizations.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Fistera ◽  
Dirk Pabst ◽  
Annalena Härtl ◽  
Benedikt Michael Schaarschmidt ◽  
Lale Umutlu ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: COVID-19 pandemia is a major challenge to worldwide health care systems. Whereas the majority of disease presents with mild symptoms that can be treated as outpatients, severely ill COVID-19 patients and patients presenting with similar symptoms cross their ways in the Emergency Department. Especially the variety of symptoms is challenging with primary triage. Are there parameters to distinguish between proven COVID-19 and without before? How can a safe and efficient management of these inpatients be achieved?Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 314 consecutive inpatient patients who presented with possible symptoms of COVID-19 in a German emergency department between March and April 2020 and were tested with a SARS-Cov-2 nasopharyngeal swab. Clinical parameters, Manchester Triage System categories and lab results were compared between patients with positive and negative test results for SARS-Cov-2. Furthermore, we present the existing COVID-19 workflow model of the university hospital in Essen which proved to be efficient during pandemia.Results: 43 of the 314 patients (13.7%) were tested positive for COVID-19 by SARS-Cov-2 nasopharyngeal swab. We did not find any laboratory parameter to distinguish safely between patients with COVID-19 and those with similar symptoms. Dysgeusia was the only clinical symptom that was significantly more frequent among COVID-19 patients. Conclusion: Dysgeusia seems to be a typical symptom for COVID-19, which occurred in 14% of our COVID-19 patients. However, no valid parameters could be found to distinguish clinically between COVID-19 and other diseases with similar symptoms. Therefore, early testing, a strict isolation policy and proper personal protection are crucial to maintain workflow and safety of patients and ED staff for the months to come.Trial registration: URL: https://www.drks.de/drks_web/navigate.do?navigationId=trial.HTML&TRIAL_ID=DRKS00021675


2005 ◽  
Vol 80 (1) ◽  
pp. 135-138 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniele Giovanardi ◽  
Carmela Nives Castellana ◽  
Stefania Pisa ◽  
Brunella Poppi ◽  
Diego Pinetti ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. OP.20.00617
Author(s):  
Arthur S. Hong ◽  
Hannah Chang ◽  
D. Mark Courtney ◽  
Hannah Fullington ◽  
Simon J. Craddock Lee ◽  
...  

PURPOSE: Patients with cancer undergoing treatment frequently visit the emergency department (ED) for commonly anticipated complaints (eg, pain, nausea, and vomiting). Nearly all Medicare Oncology Care Model (OCM) participants prioritized ED use reduction, and the OCM requires that patients have 24-hour telephone access to a clinician, but actual reductions in ED visits have been mixed. Little is known about the use of telephone triage for acute care. METHODS: We identified adults aged 18+ years newly diagnosed with cancer, linked to ED visits from a single institution within 6 months after diagnosis, and then analyzed the telephone and secure electronic messages in the preceding 24 hours. We coded interactions to classify the reason for the call, the main ED referrer, and other attempted management. We compared the acuity of patient self-referred versus clinician-referred ED visits by modeling hospitalization and ED visit severity. RESULTS: From 2011 to 2018, 3,247 adults made 5,371 ED visits to the university hospital and self-referred to the ED 58.5% of the time. Clinicians referred to outpatient or oncology urgent care for 10.3% of calls but referred to the ED for 61.3%. Patient self-referred ED visits were likely to be hospitalized (adjusted Odds Ratio [aOR], 0.89, 95% CI, 0.64 to 1.22) and were not more severe (aOR, 0.75, 95% CI, 0.55 to 1.02) than clinician referred. CONCLUSION: Although patients self-referred for six of every 10 ED visits, self-referred visits were not more severe. When patients called for advice, clinicians regularly recommended the ED. More should be done to understand barriers that patients and clinicians experience when trying to access non-ED acute care.


2021 ◽  
Vol 319 ◽  
pp. 01077
Author(s):  
Amrani Hanchi Sahar ◽  
Hoummani Hasnae ◽  
Mourabiti Hajar ◽  
Chebaibi Mohammed ◽  
Chaouki Sana ◽  
...  

Introduction. —The Covid-19 pandemic and the containment situation, has generated enormous risks for children. Indeed, with the closure of schools, children, forced to stay at home, found themselves in permanent contact with dangerous products (drugs, disinfectants, plants) exposing them to accidental poisoning. Objective. —To describe the epidemiological, clinical and evolutionary aspects of the cases of pediatric intoxications in the UHC during the period of Covid-19, in order to assess the repercussions of this pandemic on the profile of these intoxications, in terms of number and incriminated products. Material and method. — This is a retrospective descriptive comparative study of intoxication cases admitted to the pediatric emergency department of the University Hospital of Fez spread over 2 years; from March 1, 2019 to February 2021; comparing intoxications admitted during the period of Covid-19 with the previous year. Results. — The emergency department recorded 132 cases of intoxication during the Covid-19 period (compared to 104 cases in 2019). Fez was always the most concerned city (66.21% against 69.02% in 2019). The cases emanated from the urban environment in (58.78%). The accidental circumstance was the most frequent, with an increase from 77.88% in 2019 to 82.02%. The rate of cases of envenomation that consulted was almost similar; children are more exposed to scorpion stings (73.52%) than snake bites. The analysis of incriminated products was marked by the increase of Caustics (20.38% in 2019 to 24.24% in 2020), and the decrease of pesticides (19.41% in 2019 to 13.63%). The symptomatology was dominated by neurological signs in 25.75% of cases, followed by respiratory disorders (18.18%). The evolution was favorable in 95.46%, and death occurred in 4.54% of cases compared to 3.84% in2019. The Covid-19 pandemic has changed the use of antidotes.


2019 ◽  
Vol 09 (10) ◽  
pp. 212-223
Author(s):  
Alexandre S. Korsaga ◽  
Anatole J. I. Ouedraogo ◽  
Sayouba Tinto ◽  
Ives R. Kieno ◽  
Mamoudou Sawadogo ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document