scholarly journals A Comparitive Study between Sars-Cov2 Antigen Positive Samples With Cycle Threshold Values from Rt-Pcr Testing

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 ◽  
pp. S61
Author(s):  
Sneha Dey ◽  
Sneha Mohan
Keyword(s):  
Threshold Values ◽  
Rt Pcr ◽  
Cycle Threshold

scholarly journals Preanalytical Issues and Cycle Threshold Values in SARS-CoV-2 Real-Time RT-PCR Testing: Should Test Results Include These?

ACS Omega ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ilka Engelmann ◽  
Enagnon Kazali Alidjinou ◽  
Judith Ogiez ◽  
Quentin Pagneux ◽  
Sana Miloudi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Real Time ◽  
Test Results ◽  
Threshold Values ◽  
Rt Pcr ◽  
Cycle Threshold

scholarly journals Cycle Threshold Values in the Context of Multiple RT-PCR Testing for SARS-CoV-2

2021 ◽  
Vol Volume 14 ◽  
pp. 1311-1317
Author(s):  
Daniel Romero-Alvarez ◽  
Daniel Garzon-Chavez ◽  
Franklin Espinosa ◽  
Edison Ligña ◽  
Enrique Teran ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Threshold Values ◽  
Rt Pcr ◽  
Cycle Threshold

scholarly journals The 501Y.V2 SARS-CoV-2 variant has an intermediate viral load between the 501Y.V1 and the historical variants in nasopharyngeal samples from newly diagnosed COVID-19 patients

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elisa Teyssou ◽  
Cathia Soulie ◽  
Benoit Visseaux ◽  
Sidonie Lambert-Niclot ◽  
Valentine Ferre ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Viral Load ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Threshold Values ◽  
Rt Pcr ◽  
Cycle Threshold ◽  
The World

The 501Y.V2 and the 501Y.V1 SARS-CoV-2 variants emerged and spread rapidly into the world. We analysed the RT-PCR cycle threshold values of 643 nasopharyngeal samples of COVID-19 patients at diagnosis and found that the 501Y.V2 variant presented an intermediate viral load between the 501Y.V1 and the historical variants.

Factors associated with real-time RT-PCR cycle threshold values among medically attended influenza episodes

2015 ◽  
Vol 88 (4) ◽  
pp. 719-723 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah Spencer ◽  
Jessie Chung ◽  
Mark Thompson ◽  
Pedro A. Piedra ◽  
Alan Jewell ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Real Time ◽  
Threshold Values ◽  
Rt Pcr ◽  
Factors Associated ◽  
Cycle Threshold

scholarly journals Sampling site for SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR—An intrapatient four-site comparison from Tampere, Finland

PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (11) ◽  
pp. e0260184
Author(s):  
Dominik Kerimov ◽  
Pekka Tamminen ◽  
Hanna Viskari ◽  
Lauri Lehtimäki ◽  
Janne Aittoniemi
Keyword(s):  
Informed Consent ◽  
Study Design ◽  
Nasal Swab ◽  
Sampling Site ◽  
Threshold Values ◽  
Rt Pcr ◽  
Cycle Threshold ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Nasal Swabs ◽  
Written Informed Consent

Background SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis relies on the performance of nasopharyngeal swabs. Alternative sample sites have been assessed but the heterogeneity of the studies have made comparing different sites difficult. Objectives Our aim was to compare the performance of four different sampling sites for SARS-CoV-2 samples with nasopharynx being the benchmark. Study design COVID-19 positive patients were recruited prospectively, and samples were collected and analysed for SARS-CoV-2 with RT-PCR from all four anatomical sites in 43 patients, who provided written informed consent. Results All anterior nasal and saliva samples were positive, while two oropharyngeal samples were negative. There was no significant difference in the cycle threshold values of nasopharyngeal and anterior nasal samples while saliva and oropharynx had higher cycle threshold values. Conclusions Anterior nasal swab performs as good as nasopharynx swab with saliva also finding all the positives but with higher cycle threshold values. Thus, we can conclude that anterior nasal swabs can be used for SARS-CoV-2 detection instead of nasopharyngeal swabs if the situation would require so.

scholarly journals Duration of infectiousness and correlation with RT-PCR cycle threshold values in cases of COVID-19, England, January to May 2020

2020 ◽  
Vol 25 (32) ◽  
Author(s):  
Anika Singanayagam ◽  
Monika Patel ◽  
Andre Charlett ◽  
Jamie Lopez Bernal ◽  
Vanessa Saliba ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Viral Load ◽  
Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome ◽  
Respiratory Tract ◽  
Symptom Onset ◽  
Infectious Virus ◽  
Upper Respiratory Tract ◽  
Threshold Values ◽  
Rt Pcr ◽  
Cycle Threshold ◽  
Upper Respiratory

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 viral load in the upper respiratory tract peaks around symptom onset and infectious virus persists for 10 days in mild-to-moderate coronavirus disease (n = 324 samples analysed). RT-PCR cycle threshold (Ct) values correlate strongly with cultivable virus. Probability of culturing virus declines to 8% in samples with Ct > 35 and to 6% 10 days after onset; it is similar in asymptomatic and symptomatic persons. Asymptomatic persons represent a source of transmissible virus.

scholarly journals Performance of At-Home Self-Collected Saliva and Nasal-Oropharyngeal Swabs in the Surveillance of COVID-19

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paulo H. Braz-Silva ◽  
Ana C. Mamana ◽  
Camila M. Romano ◽  
Alvina C. Felix ◽  
Anderson V. de Paula ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Public Health ◽  
Strong Correlation ◽  
Threshold Values ◽  
Rt Pcr ◽  
New Approach ◽  
Significant Agreement ◽  
Cycle Threshold ◽  
Worldwide Population ◽  
Positive Results ◽  
At Home

ABSTRACTSARS-CoV-2 quickly spread in the worldwide population by contact with oral and respiratory secretions of infected individuals, imposing social restrictions to control the infection. Massive testing is essential to breaking the chain of COVID-19 transmission. The aim of this study was to compare the performance of at-home self-collected samples - saliva and combined nasal-oropharyngeal swabs (NOP) - for SARS-CoV-2 detection in a telemedicine platform for COVID-19 surveillance. We analyzed 201 patients who met the criteria of suspected COVID-19. NOP sampling were combined (nostrils and oropharynx) and saliva collected using a cotton pad device. Detection of SARS-COV-2 was performed by using the Altona RealStar® SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR Kit 1.0. According to our data, there was an overall significant agreement (κ coefficient value of 0.58) between the performances of saliva and NOP. Assuming that positive results in either sample represent true infections, 70 patients positive for SARS-CoV-2 were identified, with 52/70 being positive in NOP and 55/70 in saliva. This corresponds to sensitivities of 74.2% (95% CI; 63.7% to 83.1%) for NOP and 78.6% (95% CI; 67.6% to 86.6%) for saliva. We also found a strong correlation (β-coefficients < 1) between the cycle threshold values in saliva and NOP. Ageusia was the only symptom associated with patients SARS-CoV-2 positive only in NOP (p=0.028). In conclusion, our data show the feasibility of using at-home self-collected samples (especially saliva), as an adequate alternative for SARS-CoV-2 detection. This new approach of testing can be useful to develop strategies for COVID-19 surveillance and for guiding public health decisions.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document