Effects on Lung Perfusion Distribution in Lung Cancer Patients Underwent Radiation Therapy

Author(s):  
L. Yin ◽  
M. Liu ◽  
J. Wu ◽  
S. Shcherbinin ◽  
A. Celler ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Vol 92 (1103) ◽  
pp. 20190174 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hannah Mary T Thomas ◽  
Jing Zeng ◽  
Howard J Lee, Jr ◽  
Balu Krishna Sasidharan ◽  
Paul E Kinahan ◽  
...  

Objective: The effect of functional lung avoidance planning on radiation dose-dependent changes in regional lung perfusion is unknown. We characterized dose-perfusion response on longitudinal perfusion single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT)/CT in two cohorts of lung cancer patients treated with and without functional lung avoidance techniques. Methods: The study included 28 primary lung cancer patients: 20 from interventional (NCT02773238) (FLARE-RT) and eight from observational (NCT01982123) (LUNG-RT) clinical trials. FLARE-RT treatment plans included perfused lung dose constraints while LUNG-RT plans adhered to clinical standards. Pre- and 3 month post-treatment macro-aggregated albumin (MAA) SPECT/CT scans were rigidly co-registered to planning four-dimensional CT scans. Tumour-subtracted lung dose was converted to EQD2 and sorted into 5 Gy bins. Mean dose and percent change between pre/post-RT MAA-SPECT uptake (%ΔPERF), normalized to total tumour-subtracted lung uptake, were calculated in each binned dose region. Perfusion frequency histograms of pre/post-RT MAA-SPECT were analyzed. Dose–response data were parameterized by sigmoid logistic functions to estimate maximum perfusion increase (%ΔPERFmaxincrease), maximum perfusion decrease (%ΔPERFmaxdecrease), dose midpoint (Dmid), and dose-response slope (k). Results: Differences in MAA perfusion frequency distribution shape between time points were observed in 11/20 (55%) FLARE-RT and 2/8 (25%) LUNG-RT patients (p < 0.05). FLARE-RT dose response was characterized by >10% perfusion increase in the 0–5 Gy dose bin for 8/20 patients (%ΔPERFmaxincrease = 10–40%), which was not observed in any LUNG-RT patients (p = 0.03). The dose midpoint Dmid at which relative perfusion declined by 50% trended higher in FLARE-RT compared to LUNG-RT cohorts (35 GyEQD2 vs 21 GyEQD2, p = 0.09), while the dose-response slope k was similar between FLARE-RT and LUNG-RT cohorts (3.1–3.2, p = 0.86). Conclusion: Functional lung avoidance planning may promote increased post-treatment perfusion in low dose regions for select patients, though inter-patient variability remains high in unbalanced cohorts. These preliminary findings form testable hypotheses that warrant subsequent validation in larger cohorts within randomized or case-matched control investigations. Advances in knowledge: This novel preliminary study reports differences in dose-response relationships between patients receiving functional lung avoidance radiation therapy (FLARE-RT) and those receiving conventionally planned radiation therapy (LUNG-RT). Following further validation and testing of these effects in larger patient populations, individualized estimation of regional lung perfusion dose-response may help refine future risk-adaptive strategies to minimize lung function deficits and toxicity incidence.


2014 ◽  
Vol 42 (1) ◽  
pp. 391-399 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexandra R. Cunliffe ◽  
Clay Contee ◽  
Samuel G. Armato ◽  
Bradley White ◽  
Julia Justusson ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
M. Trovo ◽  
T.M. Bortolin ◽  
C. Furlan ◽  
R. Tedeschi ◽  
J. Polesel ◽  
...  

2003 ◽  
Vol 21 (13) ◽  
pp. 2529-2536 ◽  
Author(s):  
Minesh P. Mehta ◽  
Patrick Rodrigus ◽  
C.H.J. Terhaard ◽  
Aroor Rao ◽  
John Suh ◽  
...  

Purpose: This phase III randomized trial evaluated survival as well as neurologic and neurocognitive function in patients with brain metastases from solid tumors receiving whole-brain radiation therapy (WBRT) with or without motexafin gadolinium (MGd). Patients and Methods: Patients were randomly assigned to 30 Gy of WBRT ± 5 mg/kg/d MGd. Survival and time to neurologic progression determined by a blinded events review committee (ERC) were coprimary end points. Standardized investigator neurologic assessment and neurocognitive testing were evaluated. Results: Four hundred one (251 non–small-cell lung cancer) patients were enrolled. There was no significant difference by treatment arm in survival (median, 5.2 months for MGd v 4.9 months for WBRT; P = .48) or time to neurologic progression (median, 9.5 months for MGd v 8.3 months for WBRT; P = .95). Treatment with MGd improved time to neurologic progression in patients with lung cancer (median, not reached for MGd v 7.4 months for WBRT; P = .048, unadjusted). By investigator, MGd improved time to neurologic progression in all patients (median, 4.3 months for MGd v 3.8 months for WBRT; P = .018) and in lung cancer patients (median, 5.5 months for MGd v 3.7 months for WBRT; P = .025). MGd improved neurocognitive function in lung cancer patients. Conclusion: The overall results did not demonstrate significant differences by treatment arm for survival and ERC time to neurologic progression. Investigator neurologic assessments demonstrated an MGd treatment benefit in all patients. In lung cancer patients, ERC- and investigator-determined time to neurologic progression demonstrated an MGd treatment benefit. MGd may improve time to neurologic and neurocognitive progression in lung cancer.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document