Validation of the ‘Lesion Quotient’ as a Radiographic Tool to Distinguish between Radiation Necrosis and Tumor Progression for Brain Metastases Treated with Stereotactic Radiosurgery

2010 ◽  
Vol 78 (3) ◽  
pp. S266
Author(s):  
A.L. Stockham ◽  
S.A. Koyfman ◽  
E.A. Budnick ◽  
C.A. Reddy ◽  
G.H. Barnett ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Brain Metastases ◽  
Tumor Progression ◽  
Stereotactic Radiosurgery ◽  
Radiation Necrosis

scholarly journals The centrally restricted diffusion sign on MRI for assessment of radiation necrosis in metastases treated with stereotactic radiosurgery

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicolin Hainc ◽  
Noor Alsafwani ◽  
Andrew Gao ◽  
Philip J. O’Halloran ◽  
Paul Kongkham ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Brain Metastases ◽  
Tumor Progression ◽  
Stereotactic Radiosurgery ◽  
Interobserver Agreement ◽  
Radiation Necrosis ◽  
Restricted Diffusion ◽  
Post Contrast ◽  
Primary Tumors ◽  
Increased Susceptibility ◽  
Subsequent Intervention

Abstract Purpose Differentiation of radiation necrosis from tumor progression in brain metastases treated with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is challenging. For this, we assessed the performance of the centrally restricted diffusion sign. Methods Patients with brain metastases treated with SRS who underwent a subsequent intervention (biopsy/resection) for a ring-enhancing lesion on preoperative MRI between 2000 and 2020 were included. Excluded were lesions containing increased susceptibility limiting assessment of DWI. Two neuroradiologists classified the location of the diffusion restriction with respect to the post-contrast T1 images as centrally within the ring-enhancement (the centrally restricted diffusion sign), peripherally correlating to the rim of contrast enhancement, both locations, or none. Measures of diagnostic accuracy and 95% CI were calculated for the centrally restricted diffusion sign. Cohen's kappa was calculated to identify the interobserver agreement. Results Fifty-nine patients (36 female; mean age 59, range 40 to 80) were included, 36 with tumor progression and 23 with radiation necrosis based on histopathology. Primary tumors included 34 lung, 12 breast, 5 melanoma, 3 colorectal, 2 esophagus, 1 head and neck, 1 endometrium, and 1 thyroid. The centrally restricted diffusion sign was seen in 19/23 radiation necrosis cases (sensitivity 83% (95% CI 63 to 93%), specificity 64% (95% CI 48 to 78%), PPV 59% (95% CI 42 to 74%), NPV 85% (95% CI 68 to 94%)) and 13/36 tumor progression cases (difference p < 0.001). Interobserver agreement was substantial, at 0.61 (95% CI 0.45 to 70.8). Conclusion We found a low probability of radiation necrosis in the absence of the centrally restricted diffusion sign.

Imaging changes over 18 months following stereotactic radiosurgery for brain metastases: both late radiation necrosis and tumor progression can occur

2017 ◽  
Vol 136 (1) ◽  
pp. 207-212 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dylann Fujimoto ◽  
Rie von Eyben ◽  
Iris C. Gibbs ◽  
Steven D. Chang ◽  
Gordon Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Brain Metastases ◽  
Tumor Progression ◽  
Stereotactic Radiosurgery ◽  
Radiation Necrosis

scholarly journals MLTI-15. A CASE SERIES OF PRE-OPERATIVE GAMMA-KNIFE RADIOSURGERY FOR RESECTABLE BRAIN METASTASES

2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. i17-i17
Author(s):  
Tatsuya Takezaki ◽  
Haruaki Yamamoto ◽  
Naoki Shinojima ◽  
Jun-ichiro Kuroda ◽  
Shigeo Yamashiro ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Brain Metastases ◽  
Stereotactic Radiosurgery ◽  
Gamma Knife ◽  
Systemic Treatment ◽  
Radiation Necrosis ◽  
Gamma Knife Radiosurgery ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Phase 3 ◽  
Optimal Sequence ◽  
Median Margin

Abstract Recent advances in the systemic treatment of various cancers have resulted in longer survival and higher incidence of brain metastases. Phase 3 trials in north America and in Japan have demonstrated that stereotactic radiosurgery will be a standard adjuvant modality following surgery for resectable brain metastases. However, we don’t know the optimal sequence of this combination therapy. We hypothesized that pre-operative stereotactic radiosurgery for resectable brain metastases provides favorable rates of local control, overall survival, leptomeningeal dissemination and symptomatic radiation necrosis. We have experienced 4 cases of resected brain metastases within 1–7 days after Gamma-knife surgery (median margin dose:22Gy) and have been following their clinical course. We will show the repressive cases.

scholarly journals 31. RADIATION NECROSIS IN STEREOTACTIC RADIOSURGERY AND CHECKPOINTS INHIBITORS FOR BRAIN METASTASES FROM LUNG ADENOCARCINOMA

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. ii5-ii5
Author(s):  
James Jurica ◽  
Shraddha Dalwadi ◽  
David Baskin ◽  
Eric Bernicker ◽  
Brian Butler ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Multivariate Analysis ◽  
Brain Metastases ◽  
Lung Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Stereotactic Radiosurgery ◽  
Median Survival ◽  
Radiation Necrosis ◽  
Concomitant Treatment ◽  
Prognostic Assessment ◽  
Graded Prognostic Assessment

Abstract PURPOSE Treatment with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) is increasingly common for brain metastases (BM) from lung adenocarcinoma. Rates of radiation necrosis (RN) with SRS in the setting of ICIs is an ongoing area of research. We investigated rates of RN in patients with BM from lung adenocarcinoma treated with SRS with or without concurrent ICIs. METHODS We identified 39 patients at a single institution who underwent SRS treatment for BM from lung adenocarcinoma. Of these, 19 (49%) received SRS without ICIs and 20 (51%) patients received ICIs within a month of SRS. The rate of RN, defined by MRI features and histology when available, was compared between each group using multivariate analysis. Kaplan Meier survival estimates were calculated based on overall survival and compared to median survival predicted by the graded prognostic assessment. RESULTS Overall survival for all patients from diagnosis of brain metastases was 16.6 months (range 3.6–45.9) and median survival predicted by the graded prognostic assessment was 13.7 months (range 6.9–26.5). In total 11 (28%) patients developed MRI and/or histologic evidence for RN during the follow-up period; 5 of 20 (25%) from the SRS with ICI group and 6 of 19 (31%) from the SRS without ICI group. In multivariate analysis, ICI treatment had no significant impact on rates of RN between groups (OR 0.72 [95% CI: 0.17–2.93]; p=0.65) while bevacizumab treatment was associated with a decreased RN risk (OR 0.88 [95% CI: 0.43–0.99]; p=0.02). CONCLUSION Retrospective analysis of patients with BM from lung adenocarcinoma treated with SRS suggested that administration of ICIs does not increase risk for development of RN. Further, concomitant treatment with bevacizumab may decrease risk of RN. These findings suggest that patients with BM from lung adenocarcinoma can be treated with combination therapy without increased risk of neurologic toxicity.

scholarly journals OS3 - 187 Differentiating Radionecrosis from Tumor Progression Using IVIM perfusion Fraction in Brain Metastases Treated with Radiosurgery

2016 ◽  
Vol 43 (S4) ◽  
pp. S2-S2
Author(s):  
J Detsky ◽  
J Conklin ◽  
J Keith ◽  
S Symons ◽  
A Sahgal ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Brain Metastases ◽  
Tumor Progression ◽  
Gold Standard ◽  
Diffusion Weighted Imaging ◽  
Radiation Necrosis ◽  
The Other ◽  
Recurrent Tumor ◽  
Perfusion Fraction ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Pathology Reports

Radiation necrosis occurs in 5-25% of patients who undergo stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for brain metastases. Intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) uses MRI diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) to assess regional perfusion. We investigated the utility of IVIM to differentiate recurrent tumor from radionecrosis after SRS. Patients who had SRS and subsequent surgical resection of what was thought to be either tumor progression or necrosis were included. ROIs were contoured on the pre-operative post-Gd T1-weighted images and transferred to DWI images using automated co-registration. The perfusion fraction (f) was calculated using asymptotic fitting and the mean f (fmean), 90th percentile for f (f90), mean ADC (ADCmean) and 10th percentile for ADC (ADC10) were calculated. Pathology reports were used to identify the predominant feature (necrosis versus tumor). Nine patients with ten lesions were included. One lesion exhibited pure necrosis while the other nine were mixed; three were predominantly (>75%) tumor, three predominantly necrosis, and three were equal parts of both. The perfusion fraction was significantly higher in cases with predominantly tumor compared to those with predominantly necrosis (fmean 0.10±0.01 vs 0.08±0.01, p=0.02 and f90 0.22±0.01 vs 0.14±0.02, p<0.001). ADC did not differentiate tumor from necrosis (ADCmean 0.97±0.23 vs 1.02±0.36, p=0.8 and ADC10 0.53±0.29 vs 0.76±0.29, p=0.33). The IVIM perfusion fraction is useful in differentiating recurrent tumor from radionecrosis in brain metastases treated with SRS. This is the first study to evaluate IVIM against the gold standard (histopathology).

scholarly journals Gamma Knife versus Frameless Linear Accelerator Based Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Brain Metastases: Clinical Outcomes and Factors Associated with Local Failure and Radiation Necrosis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gregory S. Alexander ◽  
Jill S. Remick ◽  
Emily S. Kowalski ◽  
Kai Sun ◽  
Yannick Poirer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Brain Metastases ◽  
Stereotactic Radiosurgery ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Gamma Knife ◽  
Linear Accelerator ◽  
Radiation Necrosis ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Local Failure ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Chi Square Analysis

Abstract BackgroundSingle-fraction stereotactic radiosurgery (SF-SRS) for the treatment of brain metastases can be delivered with either a Gamma-Knife platform (GK-SRS) or with a frameless linear accelerator (LA-SRS) which vary based on patterns of prescribing, patient setup and radiation delivery. Whether these differences affect clinical outcomes is unknown. MethodsPatients treated for metastatic brain cancer treated with SF-SRS from 2014-2020 were retrospectively reviewed and clinical outcomes were recorded on a per lesion basis. Covariates between groups were compared using a Chi-square analysis for dichotomous variables and t-test for continuous variables. Median follow up was calculated using the reverse Kaplan Meier (KM) method. Primary endpoints of local failure (LF) and symptomatic radiation necrosis (RN) were estimated using the KM method with salvage WBRT used as a censoring event. Outcome estimates were compared using the log-rank test. Multivariate analysis (MVA) and Cox proportional hazards modeling were used for statistical analyses. Propensity score (PS) adjustments were used to reduce the effects confounding variables.ResultsOverall, 119 patients with 287 lesions were included for analysis which included 57 patients (127 lesions) treated with LA-SRS compared to 62 patients (160 lesions) treated with GK-SRS. On both multivariate and univariate analysis, there was no statistically significant differences between GK-SRS and LA-SRS for LF, RN, or the combined endpoint of either LF or RN (multivariate p-value=0.17).ConclusionsIn our retrospective cohort, we found no statistically significant differences in the incidence of RN or LF in patients treated with GK-SRS when compared to LA-SRS.Trial Registration: Retrospectively registered

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document