Temporal Lobe Reactions After Carbon Ion Radiation Therapy: Comparison of Relative Biological Effectiveness–Weighted Tolerance Doses Predicted by Local Effect Models I and IV

2014 ◽  
Vol 88 (5) ◽  
pp. 1136-1141 ◽  
Author(s):  
Clarissa Gillmann ◽  
Oliver Jäkel ◽  
Ingmar Schlampp ◽  
Christian P. Karger
2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Saager ◽  
Christin Glowa ◽  
Peter Peschke ◽  
Stephan Brons ◽  
Rebecca Grün ◽  
...  

Abstract Background To determine the relative biological effectiveness (RBE) and α/β-values after fractionated carbon ion irradiations of the rat spinal cord with varying linear energy transfer (LET) to benchmark RBE-model calculations. Material and methods The rat spinal cord was irradiated with 6 fractions of carbon ions at 6 positions within a 6 cm spread-out Bragg-peak (SOBP, LET: 16–99 keV/μm). TD50-values (dose at 50% complication probability) were determined from dose-response curves for the endpoint radiation induced myelopathy (paresis grade II) within 300 days after irradiation. Based on TD50-values of 15 MV photons, RBE-values were calculated and adding previously published data, the LET and fractional dose-dependence of the RBE was used to benchmark the local effect model (LEM I and IV). Results At six fractions, TD50-values decreased from 39.1 ± 0.4 Gy at 16 keV/μm to 17.5 ± 0.3 Gy at 99 keV/μm and the RBE increased accordingly from 1.46 ± 0.05 to 3.26 ± 0.13. Experimental α/β-ratios ranged from 6.9 ± 1.1 Gy to 44.3 ± 7.2 Gy and increased strongly with LET. Including all available data, comparison with model-predictions revealed that (i) LEM IV agrees better in the SOBP, while LEM I fits better in the entrance region, (ii) LEM IV describes the slope of the RBE within the SOBP better than LEM I, and (iii) in contrast to the strong LET-dependence, the RBE-deviations depend only weakly on fractionation within the measured range. Conclusions This study extends the available RBE data base to significantly lower fractional doses and performes detailed tests of the RBE-models LEM I and IV. In this comparison, LEM IV agrees better with the experimental data in the SOBP than LEM I. While this could support a model replacement in treatment planning, careful dosimetric analysis is required for the individual patient to evaluate potential clinical consequences.


Cancers ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 46 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kyungdon Choi ◽  
Silvia Molinelli ◽  
Stefania Russo ◽  
Alfredo Mirandola ◽  
Maria Rosaria Fiore ◽  
...  

The clinical application of different relative biological effectiveness (RBE) models for carbon ion RBE-weighted dose calculation hinders a global consensus in defining normal tissue constraints. This work aims to update the local effect model (LEM)-based constraints for the rectum using microdosimetric kinetic model (mMKM)-defined values, relying on RBE translation and the analysis of long-term clinical outcomes. LEM-optimized plans of treated patients, having suffered from prostate adenocarcinoma (n = 22) and sacral chordoma (n = 41), were recalculated with the mMKM using an in-house developed tool. The relation between rectum dose-volume points in the two RBE systems (DLEM|v and DMKM|v) was fitted to translate new LEM-based constraints. Normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) values, predicting late rectal toxicity, were obtained by applying published parameters. No late rectal toxicity events were reported within the patient cohort. The rectal toxicity outcome was confirmed using dosimetric analysis: DMKMVHs lay largely below original constraints; the translated DLEM|v values were 4.5%, 8.3%, 18.5%, and 35.4% higher than the nominal DMKM|v of the rectum volume, v—1%, 5%, 10% and 20%. The average NTCP value ranged from 5% for the prostate adenocarcinoma, to 0% for the sacral chordoma group. The redefined constraints, to be confirmed prospectively with clinical data, are DLEM|5cc ≤ 61 Gy(RBE) and DLEM|1cc ≤ 66 Gy(RBE).


2019 ◽  
Vol 46 (3) ◽  
pp. e53-e78 ◽  
Author(s):  
Harald Paganetti ◽  
Eleanor Blakely ◽  
Alejandro Carabe-Fernandez ◽  
David J. Carlson ◽  
Indra J. Das ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document