Improved Outcomes in Acoustic Neuroma Patients Receiving Stereotactic Radiosurgery from a Single Neurosurgeon at a High-Volume Institution

219 Background: Interest is growing in value in health care, defined as better outcomes at lower costs. A primary driver of cost in radiation oncology is the use of IMRT. We examined the patterns and correlates of use of IMRT across Michigan using publicly available data. Methods: As a certificate of need state, Michigan requires every radiation oncology facility to report yearly the number of external beam and IMRT treatments delivered. Data for 2005-2008 were obtained through a Freedom of Information Act request of the Michigan Department of Community Health, while 2009-2010 data were available at its website. Percentage of external beam treatments delivered using IMRT (IMRT%) was examined across centers over time and repeated-measures longitudinal linear regression was used to identify factors associated with use. Results: During 2005-2010, 48 to 65 centers reported data. Median IMRT% (range) rose steadily during the study period: 2005 16% (0-64); 2006 21% (0-57); 2007 27% (0-79); 2008 37% (7-85); 2009 41% (0-87) 2010 45% (7-100). There was also significant between-center variation (see table). Regression modeling demonstrated that IMRT% was associated with year (+6.7% per year, p<0.0001), facility type (+7.1% freestanding versus hospital, p<0.11), facility annual volume (+5.0% high volume: 7,000+ versus low: <7,000, p=0.01) and the interaction between year and volume (low volume +2.4% per year versus high volume p<0.02). The significant interaction between year and volume suggests that the greatest IMRT% growth was in low volume centers (6.7% per year versus 4.3% per year for high volume). Conclusions: IMRT utilization has grown steadily across Michigan between 2005 and 2010. There is significant variation in its use that appears to be related in part to facility characteristics. The newly established Michigan Radiation Oncology Quality Collaborative (MROQC) is beginning to explore the use of IMRT in patients with breast and lung cancer statewide to identify those groups of patients where improved outcomes may justify its higher cost. [Table: see text]

Download Full-text

Treatment at high-volume facilities and academic centers in relation to overall survival in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer: A National Cancer Database analysis

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2018.36.4_suppl.392 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 36 (4_suppl) ◽

pp. 392-392

Author(s):

John David ◽

Sungjin Kim ◽

Erik Anderson ◽

Arman Torossian ◽

Simon Lo ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Pancreatic Cancer ◽

Overall Survival ◽

Surgical Resection ◽

Locally Advanced ◽

Advanced Pancreatic Cancer ◽

High Volume ◽

Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer ◽

Median Income ◽

National Cancer Database ◽

Improved Outcomes

392 Background: Numerous studies have shown that treatment at a high volume facility (HVF) for patients (pts) with pancreatic cancer is associated with improved outcomes, particularly with pancreatectomy. In fact, a recent study showed that pts undergoing a pancreatectomy at an academic center (AC) is independently associated with improved outcomes. However, the role of chemotherapy (CT) and radiation (RT) in the treatment of locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) at HVF and AC, to our knowledge, has not been studied. Herein, we investigate the benefit of treatment at HVF and AC compared to low volume facilities (LVF) and non-academic centers (NAC) with CT or chemoradiation (CRT) in pts with LAPC. Methods: The National Cancer Database (NCDB) was utilized to identify LAPC patients treated at all facility types. All patients were treated with CT or CRT. Univariate (UVA) and multivariate (MVA) Cox regression were performed to identify the impact of HVF and AC on overall survival (OS) when compared to LVF and NAC, respectively. HVF was defined as the top 5% of facilities by number of pts treated. Results: From 2004 – 2014, a total of 10139 pts were identified. The median age was 66 years (range 22-90) with median follow up of 48.8 months (46-52.1 months); 49.9% were male and 50.1% female. All pts had clinical stage 3/T4 disease irrespective of nodal metastases. Of these, 4779 pts were treated at an AC and 5260 were treated at a NAC and 588 were treated at HVF and 9551 were treated at LVF. On UVA, age, high median income, high education level, comorbidities, and recent year of diagnosis were associated with improved OS. ACs were associated with improved OS when compared to non-AC (HR 0.92 95% CI 0.88 – 0.96, p = 0.004), as were HVF when compared to LVH (HR 0.84 95% CI 0.76 – 0.92, p < 0.001). Odds ratio for undergoing surgical resection at HVF and AC was 1.68 and 1.37 (p < 0.001), respectively, when compared to LVF and NAC. Conclusions: The treatment of LAPC patients with CT or CRT at an AC led to significantly improved rate of surgical resection and OS. In the absence of prospective data, these results support the referral of pts with LAPC to HVF and/or AC for evaluation and treatment.

Download Full-text