scholarly journals The zenith total ankle replacement – Early results of the first 50 cases in a non-inventor series

2014 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
pp. S62
Author(s):  
Edward Jeans ◽  
Timothy Millar ◽  
Shashi Garg
Keyword(s):  
Total Ankle Replacement ◽  
Early Results ◽  
Ankle Replacement

scholarly journals Early Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of Trabecular Metal Total Ankle Using Transfibular Approach

2017 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 2473011417S0001 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexej Barg ◽  
Charles Saltzman
Keyword(s):  
Range Of Motion ◽  
Weight Bearing ◽  
Total Ankle Replacement ◽  
Trabecular Metal ◽  
Non Union ◽  
Early Loosening ◽  
Early Results ◽  
Ankle Replacement ◽  
Patient Reported

Category: Ankle, Ankle Arthritis Introduction/Purpose: In the last two decades, total ankle replacement (TAR) has gained more acceptance as a treatment option in patients with end-stage ankle osteoarthritis. However, there is a lack of literature on TAR using a lateral transfibular approach. Therefore, we sought to report early clinical and radiographic results of a patient cohort treated with TAR using a lateral transfibular approach by a single surgeon. Methods: Fifty-five primary total ankle arthroplasties using the Zimmer trabecular metal implant were performed in 54 patients (29 men and 25 women; mean age, 67.0 years) from October 2012 to December 2014. Clinical assessment including pain evaluation and measurement of ankle range of motion was done preoperatively and at the latest follow-up. Weight-bearing radiographs were used to determine the angular alignment of the tibial and talar components and to analyze the bone-implant interface. Intraoperative and postoperative complications, revision surgeries, and failures were evaluated. Results: Implant survival was 93% at 36 months follow-up. There were 3 revisions of a tibial component due to aseptic loosening. In 10 of 55 procedures, a secondary procedure was performed during follow-up. Mean follow-up duration was 26.6 ± 4.2 months. No delayed union or non-union was observed for fibula healing. The average VAS pain score decreased significantly from 7.9 ± 1.3 to 0.8 ± 1.2. The average total range of motion increased significantly from 22.9° ± 11.8° to 40.2° ± 11.8°. Conclusion: Early results of Zimmer trabecular metal total ankle replacement demonstrated improved patient-reported outcomes and increased ankle motion at a minimum follow-up of one year. In the first 55 consecutive cases, the fibular osteotomy required for access to the ankle healed without complications. Painful early loosening requiring revision due to lack of bony ingrowth was seen in 3 of 55 cases.

Two-Year Outcomes After Total Ankle Replacement With a Novel Fixed-Bearing Implant

2021 ◽  
pp. 107110072110057
Author(s):  
Sahil Kooner ◽  
Shahin Kayum ◽  
Ellie B. Pinsker ◽  
Ahmed Al Khalifa ◽  
Ryan M. Khan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Short Form ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Total Ankle Replacement ◽  
Fourth Generation ◽  
Clinical Use ◽  
Fixed Bearing ◽  
Radiographic Outcomes ◽  
Early Results ◽  
Ankle Replacement ◽  
Sf 36

Background: The Integra Cadence total ankle replacement (TAR) is a fourth-generation anatomic, fixed-bearing implant requiring minimal tibial and talar resection, which has been in clinical use since June 2016. The primary purpose of this study is to assess its short-term clinical and radiographic outcomes after TAR using this prosthesis. Methods: This is a prospective case series of consecutive patients that underwent TAR using this novel fourth-generation prosthesis between June 2016 and November 2017. The primary outcome of interest was the Ankle Osteoarthritis Scale (AOS). Secondary outcomes included Short Form Health Survey–36 (SF-36) scores, radiographic alignment, complications, reoperations, and revisions. Results: In total, 69 patients were included in our study. Fifty-one patients (73.9%) required a total of 91 ancillary procedures. Postoperatively, AOS pain scores decreased significantly by an average of 17.8±30.1 points from 45.9±18.2 to 28.4±27.3 ( P < .001). AOS disability scores also decreased significantly following surgery by an average of 22.0±30.5 points from 53.9±18.5 to 32.5±27.9 ( P < .001). The SF-36 physical component summary score improved 10.4±9.8 points from 33.1±9.1 to 42.6±9.1 ( P < .001). Radiographic analysis demonstrated significant improvement to neutral coronal plane alignment, which was achieved in 97% of patients ( P < .01) with no cyst formation at 2 years. There was 1 reported complication, 9 reoperations, and no metal or polyethylene component revisions. Overall, the 2-year implant survivorship was 100% in our cohort. Eighteen patients (26.1%) demonstrated fibrous ingrowth of the tibial component. However, outcome scores for these patients did not demonstrate any negative effects. Conclusions: In our hands, this TAR system demonstrated excellent early clinical and radiographic outcomes. Patients reported improved physical health status, pain, and disability in the postoperative period. Total ankle instrumentation allowed for accurate and reproducible implantation with correction of coronal and sagittal plane deformities. Early results for the clinical use of this TAR system are promising, but further long-term prospective outcome studies are necessary. Level of Evidence: Level IV, case series.

scholarly journals Revision Total Ankle Replacement using the Inbone 2 System, Nottingham Experience

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 2473011420S0008
Author(s):  
Hatem Salem-Saqer ◽  
Martin Raglan ◽  
Sunil Dhar
Keyword(s):  
Heterotopic Ossification ◽  
Revision Surgery ◽  
Weight Bearing ◽  
T Test ◽  
Total Ankle Replacement ◽  
Cement Spacer ◽  
Early Results ◽  
Ankle Replacement ◽  
Paired T Test

Category: Ankle Arthritis; Ankle Introduction/Purpose: The Inbone Total Ankle Replacement System (Wright) is a modular stemmed ankle replacement, it is marketed as for both primary and revision TAR, it has been in use at Nottingham since 2016 mainly for revisions, we are reporting our experience with this system and our early results. Methods: This is a retrospective study with prospective collected data. We identified 27 (18M/9F) patients who had Inbone 2 TAR for revision surgery during the period August 2016 -March 2019. The mean follow up was 21 months (7-38months). Mean age of 69 years (51-81).All ankle revisions were a single-stage revision apart from 1 patient who had a 2 stage revision as at the first stage infection was suspected, it was left with a cement spacer and when all samples came back negative the second stage was carried out.All patients had follow up appointments at 6 weeks, 3,6 and 12 months. Patients were required to fill in MOXFQ questioner and all had weight-bearing radiographs on every follow up appointment.The indication for the surgery was aseptic Loosening 23, Malalignment 1 Insert wear 2 and heterotopic ossification 1. Results: 20 patients had concurrent procedure during the surgery(Table 1). There was 1 deep wound infection that required DAIR procedure 3 weeks after the revision surgery and has gone to make full recovery, no other complication were reported.Improvement in clinical outcome and PROMS data was noted on follow up, MOXFQ for Pain improved from 70 pre op to 34 at 6 months and 32 at 1 year(p<0.001 paired t test),The outcome for Walking improved from 69 pre op to 41 at 6 months and 40 at 1 year(p<0.001 paired t test).Radiological alignment was maintained in all ankles both in the coronal and the sagittal plain, posterior heterotopic ossification was noted in 8(29%), No loosening or signs of failure at any follow up appointment Conclusion: This is one of the largest series of this implant used in revision TAR. Our early results show considerable improvement in patient outcomes with very low complications and no failures.This implant provides a good option as a revision implant and our view that it is a superior solution to ankle fusions for failed total ankle replacements [Table: see text]

Living With Both a Total Ankle Replacement and an Ankle Fusion: A Qualitative Study From the Patients’ Perspective

2021 ◽  
pp. 107110072110044
Author(s):  
Catherine Conlin ◽  
Ryan M. Khan ◽  
Ian Wilson ◽  
Timothy R. Daniels ◽  
Mansur Halai ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Setting ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Total Ankle Replacement ◽  
Qualitative Description ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Foot Placement ◽  
Advantages And Disadvantages ◽  
Ankle Fusion ◽  
Ankle Replacement ◽  
Patient Reported

Background: Total ankle replacement (TAR) and ankle fusion are effective treatments for end-stage ankle arthritis. Comparative studies elucidate differences in treatment outcomes; however, the literature lacks evidence demonstrating what outcomes are important to patients. The purpose of this study was to investigate patients’ experiences of living with both a TAR and ankle fusion. Methods: This research study used qualitative description. Individuals were selected from a cohort of patients with TAR and/or ankle fusion (n = 1254). Eligible patients were English speaking with a TAR and contralateral ankle fusion, and a minimum of 1 year since their most recent ankle reconstruction. Surgeries were performed by a single experienced surgeon, and semistructured interviews were conducted by a single researcher in a private hospital setting or by telephone. Ankle Osteoarthritis Scale (AOS) scores, radiographs, and ancillary surgical procedures were collected to characterize patients. Themes were derived through qualitative data analysis. Results: Ten adults (8 men, 2 women), ages 59 to 90 years, were included. Average AOS pain and disability scores were similar for both surgeries for most patients. Participants discussed perceptions of each reconstructed ankle. Ankle fusions were considered stable and strong, but also stiff and compromising balance. TARs were considered flexible and more like a “normal ankle,” though patients expressed concerns about their TAR “turning” on uneven ground. Individuals applied this knowledge to facilitate movement, particularly during a first step and transitioning between positions. They described the need for careful foot placement and attention to the environment to avoid potential challenges. Conclusion: This study provides insight into the experiences of individuals living with a TAR and ankle fusion. In this unusual but limited group of patients, we found that each ankle reconstruction was generally perceived to have different characteristics, advantages, and disadvantages. Most participants articulated a preference for their TAR. These findings can help clinicians better counsel patients on expectations after TAR and ankle fusion, and improve patient-reported outcome measures by better capturing meaningful outcomes for patients. Level of Evidence: Level IV, case series.

Total Ankle Arthroplasty Survivorship, Complication, and Revision Rates in Patients Younger Than 55 Years

2021 ◽  
pp. 193864002098092
Author(s):  
Devon W. Consul ◽  
Anson Chu ◽  
Travis M. Langan ◽  
Christopher F. Hyer ◽  
Gregory Berlet
Keyword(s):  
Case Series ◽  
Ankle Arthrodesis ◽  
Total Ankle Replacement ◽  
Implant Survival ◽  
Ankle Arthritis ◽  
Single Institution ◽  
Retrospective Case ◽  
Ankle Replacement ◽  
End Stage

Total ankle replacement has become a viable alternative to ankle arthrodesis in the surgical management of advanced ankle arthritis. Total ankle replacement has generally been reserved for patients who are older and for those who will have a lower demand on the replacement. The purpose of the current study is to review patient outcomes, complications, and implant survival in patients younger than 55 years who underwent total ankle replacement at a single institution. A single-center chart and radiographic review was performed of consecutive patients who underwent total ankle replacement for treatment of end-stage ankle arthritis. All surgeries were performed by 1 of 5 fellowship-trained foot and ankle surgeons at a single institution. A total of 51 patients met inclusion criteria with a mean follow-up of 31.2 months (SD = 16.2). Implant survival was 94%, There were 7 major complications (13%) requiring an unplanned return to the operating room and 8 minor complications (15%) that resolved with conservative care. The results of this study show that total ankle replacement is a viable treatment option for patients younger than 55 years. Levels of Evidence: A retrospective case series

scholarly journals Adverse Events in Total Ankle Arthroplasty, Analysis of the FDA Medical and User Facility Device Experience Database

2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 2473011419S0028
Author(s):  
Karim Mahmoud ◽  
Sreenivasulu Metikala ◽  
Kathryn O’Connor ◽  
Daniel Farber
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Aseptic Loosening ◽  
Mandatory Reporting ◽  
Total Ankle Replacement ◽  
Total Ankle Arthroplasty ◽  
Ankle Arthritis ◽  
Ankle Arthroplasty ◽  
Ankle Replacement ◽  
Mode Of Failure ◽  
User Facility

Category: Ankle Arthritis Introduction/Purpose: Total ankle replacement has become a popular treatment option for end stage ankle arthritis. Most of the reports of adverse events following total ankle replacement have been from high volume institutions and are subject to either observational or selection bias as well as potential under-reporting as they do not include the experience of community and lower volume centers and surgeons. The FDA’s Medical and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) Database provides a more complete scope of adverse events due to the mandatory reporting requirements by the FDA of implant manufactures. We reviewed the database to identify the common modes of failure and complications of total ankle implants Methods: We retrospectively reviewed reports of the MAUDE database from November 2011 to September 2018 regarding all total ankle implants. Each device in the MAUDE database is classified with a 3-letter code, we identified the 2 codes assigned to total ankle arthroplasty devices, and manually searched the FDA’s published Device Classification list for adverse events. All events were reviewed and classified. Data related to patient age or sex, surgeon, medical center location are not available in the database Results: We identified 1000 adverse reports in the period between November 2011 and September 2018. After exclusion of duplicate reports for single events or reports irrelevant to total ankle arthroplasty, a total of 697 adverse event reports were noted. The most common mode of failure was aseptic loosening (21%), followed by infection (16%), alignment and mechanical issues (instability, malalignment, malposition, stiffness, impingement) (15%), implantation issues (pin, screw or drill breakage, alignment guide problems) (9%), polyethylene related problems (wear, displaced or fractured implants) (7%), bony and soft tissue overgrowth (6%), and peri-prosthetic fractures (5%). Conclusion: Our analysis reveals that the most reported mode of failure was aseptic loosening followed by infection. However, it is notable that there are a significant number of issues with implant alignment and mechanics, complications during implantation and polyethylene component failure that are under-reported in the literature. Knowledge of these adverse events may help surgeons avoid similar complications as well as lead to improvement in component implantation and design

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document