Commentary on: Efficacy and safety of short-term (3 days) enoxaparin in preventing venous thromboembolism after gastric cancer surgery: A single-center, prospective cohort study [Int J Surg 021 Epub ahead of Print]

Abstract Introduction Malnutrition is a key priority on the global health agenda, yet the impact of nutritional state on cancer surgery across income strata remains poorly described. This study aimed to determine the effect of malnutrition on early postoperative outcomes following elective surgery for colorectal or gastric cancer. Method Multicentre, international prospective cohort study of consecutive patients undergoing elective surgery for colorectal or gastric cancer. Malnutrition was defined using the Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM) criteria. The primary outcome was death or major complication within 30 days of surgery. Multilevel logistic regression and three-way mediation analysis determined the relationship between country income group, nutritional status and early postoperative outcomes. Result This study included 5709 patients (4593 colorectal; 1116 gastric) from 381 hospitals in 75 countries. Severe malnutrition was present in one third of patients, with a disproportionate burden in upper middle (44%) and low/lower-middle income countries (64%). After adjustment for patient and hospital risk factors, severe malnutrition (aOR 1.62, 95% confidence interval 1.07 to 2.48; P = 0.024) was an independent predictor of 30-day mortality. However, major postoperative complications and surgical site infection rates were similar. Conclusion Severe malnutrition represents a high global burden in cancer surgery, particularly within low-income settings. Malnutrition is an independent risk-factor for 30-day mortality following elective surgery for colorectal or gastric cancer, suggesting perioperative nutritional interventions may improve early outcomes following cancer surgery. Take-home Message Severe malnutrition affects a large proportion of elective surgical oncology patients, with a significantly higher burden in low and middle income countries. Severe malnutrition is independently associated with increased 30-day mortality after cancer surgery.

Download Full-text

Risk of venous thromboembolism in patients undergoing gastric cancer surgery: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis

BMJ Open ◽

10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033267 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 10 (1) ◽

pp. e033267

Author(s):

Dengfeng Wang ◽

Yang Yu ◽

Pengxian Tao ◽

Dan Wang ◽

Yajing Chen ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Gastric Cancer ◽

Systematic Review ◽

Venous Thromboembolism ◽

Evaluation Method ◽

Clinical Decision Making ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Cancer Surgery ◽

Published Data ◽

Gastric Cancer Surgery ◽

Positive Prevention

IntroductionVenous thromboembolism (VTE) is a serious life-threatening complication in patients with gastric cancer. Abnormal coagulation function and tumour-related treatment may contribute to the occurrence of VTE. Many guidelines considered that surgical treatment would put patients with cancer at high risk of VTE, so positive prevention is needed. However, there are no studies that have systematically reviewed the postoperative risk and distribution of VTE in patients with gastric cancer. We thus conduct this systematic review to determine the risk of VTE in patients with gastric cancer undergoing surgery and provide some evidence for clinical decision-making.Methods and analysisStudies reporting the incidence of VTE after gastric cancer surgery will be included. Primary studies of randomised controlled trials, cohort studies, population-based surveys and cross-sectional studies are eligible for this review and only studies published in Chinese and English will be included. We will search the Medline, Embase, Web of Science, CBM, CNKI and Wanfang data from their inception to November 2019. Two reviewers will independently select studies and extract data. The quality of each included study will be assessed with tools corresponding to their study design. Meta-analysis will be used to pool the incidence data from included studies. Heterogeneity of the estimates across studies will be assessed, if necessary, a subgroup analysis will be performed to explore the source of heterogeneity. The Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation method is applied to assess the level of evidence obtained from this systematic review.Ethics and disseminationThis proposed systematic review and meta-analysis is based on published data, and thus ethical approval is not required. The results of this review will be sought for publication.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42019144562

Download Full-text