A quantitative study on endogenous formation of comparative advantage in South Korea

2018 ◽  
Vol 53 ◽  
pp. 71-87
Author(s):  
Seung-Gyu Sim ◽  
Dongwoo Yoo
2015 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Utami Baroroh

The aim of this research is to analyze the export product competitive advantage and trade’s flow in Indonesia and ASEAN to India and South Korea. Besides that, this research also mapping the opportunity and threat that show by Indonesian export characteristics through it competency and the composition of export products. The variables that used in this research are the total trade of iron ore, machine, and automotive from each countries, the world’s total trade, and export total from each countries. The methods that used were intra-industry trade (IIT) index and revealed comparative advantage (RCA). The result shows that in general the intra-industry trade for iron ore, machine, and automotive commodities in ASEAN-5 region and also India and South Korea in medium integration level. This implied the low dependency in economy. Besides that, the competition intensity level Indonesia to ASEAN-5 regions, India, and South Korea is decreasingDOI: 10.15408/sjie.v4i1.2292


1991 ◽  
Vol 50 (4) ◽  
pp. 850-873 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephan Haggard ◽  
Byung-Kook Kim ◽  
Chung-in Moon

Two basic positions have framed recent debates about South Korea's remarkable economic growth. The neoclassical position traces South Korea's take-off to a set of policy reforms in 1964 and 1965 that launched the country on the path toward export-led growth (Frank, Kim, and Westphal 1975; Kuznets 1977; Krueger 1979). Policy was far from laissez-faire, but on the whole, the reforms moved Korea in a more market-oriented direction that sought to exploit Korea's comparative advantage. The “statists,” by contrast, detail the pervasive intervention of the Korean government in the economy, even after the shift toward an outward-oriented strategy. Moreover, they argue that such intervention promoted rapid economic growth (Leudde-Neurath 1985; Jones and Sakong 1980; Amsden 1989).


2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 113
Author(s):  
Eva Ervani ◽  
Tri Widodo ◽  
Muhammad Edhie Purnawan

This paper analyzes whether East Asian countries (Indonesia, China, Japan, Hong Kong, South Korea, and Singapore) specialize on product groups with high comparative advantage. We use the data on the 3-digit SITC Revision 2 for 237 product groups published by the UN-COMTRADE. Firstly, we calculate the Revealed Symmetric Comparative Advantage (RSCA) index to know the product groups with high comparative advantage from each the East Asian countries. Secondly, we calculate the export share to know the trade specialization of product groups from each the East Asian countries. Thirdly, we compare between the product groups included in top-twenty SITC of comparative advantage with top-twenty SITC of trade specialization from each the East Asian countries. This paper concludes that throughout the study periods of 1995, 2005, and 2015, East Asian countries (Indonesia, China, Japan, Hong Kong, South Korea, and Singapore) specialize on product groups with low comparative advantage. It was also found that product classification dominating the comparative advantage and trade specialization of East Asian countries was the technology intensive products classification.


Author(s):  
Teruo Someya ◽  
Jinzo Kobayashi

Recent progress in the electron-mirror microscopy (EMM), e.g., an improvement of its resolving power together with an increase of the magnification makes it useful for investigating the ferroelectric domain physics. English has recently observed the domain texture in the surface layer of BaTiO3. The present authors ) have developed a theory by which one can evaluate small one-dimensional electric fields and/or topographic step heights in the crystal surfaces from their EMM pictures. This theory was applied to a quantitative study of the surface pattern of BaTiO3).


1950 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 104-116 ◽  
Author(s):  
Henry D. Janowitz ◽  
Franklin Hollander ◽  
David Orringer ◽  
Milton H. Levy ◽  
Asher Winkelstein ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document