scholarly journals 4-(methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanone provokes progression from chronic pancreatitis to pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia

iScience ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 103647
Author(s):  
Xin Chen ◽  
Liang Sheng ◽  
Jiguang Ma ◽  
Dan Qi ◽  
Xuqi Li ◽  
...  
2015 ◽  
Vol 106 (10) ◽  
pp. 1408-1413 ◽  
Author(s):  
In Kyeom Hwang ◽  
Haeryoung Kim ◽  
Yoon Suk Lee ◽  
Jaihwan Kim ◽  
Jai Young Cho ◽  
...  

Pancreas ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 43 (6) ◽  
pp. 849-854 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julia Kim LeBlanc ◽  
Jey-Hsin Chen ◽  
Mohammad Al-Haddad ◽  
Leticia Luz ◽  
Lee McHenry ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 246-246
Author(s):  
In kyeom Hwang ◽  
Bong Kyun Kang ◽  
Yoon Suk Lee ◽  
Jaihwan Kim ◽  
Jin-Hyeok Hwang

246 Background: The clinical significance of pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PanIN)-III, known as carcinoma in situ of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), remains unclear yet. Recent research showed inflammation enhanced early cellular invasion of PanIN-III by facilitating epithelial to mesenchymal transition (EMT), even before frank malignancy in experimental model. Therefore we decided to investigate whether PanIN-III accompanying chronic pancreatitis (CP) might have an important prognostic impact in patient who underwent curative resection for PDAC. Methods: Medical records of 199 PDAC patients with R0 resection were reviewed. Presence and grade of PanIN and CP in resected specimen were determined based on College of American Pathologists protocol. Overall survival (OS) and disease free survival (DFS) were analyzed according to PanIN-III and CP. Results: CP was observed in 19.6% (39/199) of resected specimen and PanIN-III in 21.1% (42/199). In the group with CP, PanIN-III was associated with poor prognosis in univariate analysis (16.6 months vs. 32.0 months, P=0.001 for OS and 7.5 months vs. 15.1 months, p=0.012 for DFS), whereas PanIN-III was not a prognostic factor in the group without CP. When we divided into two groups [PanIN-III accompanying CP (n=12) vs. the others (n=187)], it showed that median DFS and OS were significantly shorter in PanIN-III and CP group than those of the others (7.5 months and 16.6 months vs. 12.4 months and 26.0 months, p=0.017 and p=0.003, respectively). In multivariate analysis, PanIN-III accompanying CP remained a statistically significant poor prognostic factor (HR: 2.06; 95% CI: 1.008 to 4.221; p=0.048 for OS, HR: 2.6; 95% CI: 1.267 to 5.462; P=0.009 for DFS using Cox proportional hazard ratio). Conclusions: PanIN-III accompanying CP might influence on poor long-term outcomes in patients who underwent R0 resection for PDAC. Therefore, it would support that chronic inflammation could enhance the dissemination of carcinoma in situ.


2014 ◽  
Vol 138 (2) ◽  
pp. 220-228 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chanjuan Shi ◽  
Nipun Merchant ◽  
Guy Newsome ◽  
David M. Goldenberg ◽  
David V. Gold

Context.—PAM4 is a monoclonal antibody that shows high specificity for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) and its neoplastic precursor lesions. A PAM4-based serum immunoassay is able to detect 71% of early-stage patients and 91% with advanced disease. However, approximately 20% of patients diagnosed with chronic pancreatitis (CP) are also positive for circulating PAM4 antigen. The specificity of the PAM4 antibody is critical to the interpretation of the serum-based and immunohistochemical assays for detection of PDAC. Objective.—To determine whether PAM4 can differentiate PDAC from nonneoplastic lesions of the pancreas. Design.—Tissue microarrays of PDAC (N = 43) and surgical specimens from CP (N = 32) and benign cystic lesions (N = 19) were evaluated for expression of the PAM4 biomarker, MUC1, MUC4, CEACAM5/6, and CA19-9. Results.—PAM4 and monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) to MUC1, MUC4, CEACAM5/6, and CA19-9 were each reactive with the majority of PDAC cases; however, PAM4 was the only monoclonal antibody not to react with adjacent, nonneoplastic parenchyma. Although PAM4 labeled 19% (6 of 32) of CP specimens, reactivity was restricted to pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia associated with CP; inflamed tissues were negative in all cases. In contrast, MUC1, MUC4, CEACAM5/6, and CA19-9 were detected in 90%, 78%, 97%, and 100% of CP, respectively, with reactivity also present in nonneoplastic inflamed tissue. Conclusions.—PAM4 was the only monoclonal antibody able to differentiate PDAC (and pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia precursor lesions) from benign, nonneoplastic tissues of the pancreas. These results suggest the use of PAM4 for evaluation of tissue specimens, and support its role as an immunoassay for detection of PDAC.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document