Prognostic impact of pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PanIN)-III accompanying chronic pancreatitis in patients who underwent R0 resection for pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 246-246
Author(s):  
In kyeom Hwang ◽  
Bong Kyun Kang ◽  
Yoon Suk Lee ◽  
Jaihwan Kim ◽  
Jin-Hyeok Hwang
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Pancreatitis ◽  
Prognostic Factor ◽  
Carcinoma In Situ ◽  
Intraepithelial Neoplasia ◽  
Resected Specimen ◽  
R0 Resection ◽  
Prognostic Impact ◽  
Pancreatic Intraepithelial Neoplasia ◽  
Poor Prognostic Factor

246 Background: The clinical significance of pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PanIN)-III, known as carcinoma in situ of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), remains unclear yet. Recent research showed inflammation enhanced early cellular invasion of PanIN-III by facilitating epithelial to mesenchymal transition (EMT), even before frank malignancy in experimental model. Therefore we decided to investigate whether PanIN-III accompanying chronic pancreatitis (CP) might have an important prognostic impact in patient who underwent curative resection for PDAC. Methods: Medical records of 199 PDAC patients with R0 resection were reviewed. Presence and grade of PanIN and CP in resected specimen were determined based on College of American Pathologists protocol. Overall survival (OS) and disease free survival (DFS) were analyzed according to PanIN-III and CP. Results: CP was observed in 19.6% (39/199) of resected specimen and PanIN-III in 21.1% (42/199). In the group with CP, PanIN-III was associated with poor prognosis in univariate analysis (16.6 months vs. 32.0 months, P=0.001 for OS and 7.5 months vs. 15.1 months, p=0.012 for DFS), whereas PanIN-III was not a prognostic factor in the group without CP. When we divided into two groups [PanIN-III accompanying CP (n=12) vs. the others (n=187)], it showed that median DFS and OS were significantly shorter in PanIN-III and CP group than those of the others (7.5 months and 16.6 months vs. 12.4 months and 26.0 months, p=0.017 and p=0.003, respectively). In multivariate analysis, PanIN-III accompanying CP remained a statistically significant poor prognostic factor (HR: 2.06; 95% CI: 1.008 to 4.221; p=0.048 for OS, HR: 2.6; 95% CI: 1.267 to 5.462; P=0.009 for DFS using Cox proportional hazard ratio). Conclusions: PanIN-III accompanying CP might influence on poor long-term outcomes in patients who underwent R0 resection for PDAC. Therefore, it would support that chronic inflammation could enhance the dissemination of carcinoma in situ.

scholarly journals A hypoechoic, tumor-like lesion in the pancreatic head and neck on endoscopic ultrasonography may be due to a high-grade pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia/carcinoma in situ

2021 ◽  
pp. 50
Author(s):  
◽  
◽  
◽  
Keyword(s):  
Head And Neck ◽  
Pancreatic Duct ◽  
Carcinoma In Situ ◽  
Pancreatic Head ◽  
Intraepithelial Neoplasia ◽  
Ductal Adenocarcinoma ◽  
High Grade ◽  
Pancreatic Intraepithelial Neoplasia ◽  
Cytologic Examination

High-grade pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HG PanIN)/carcinoma in situ (CIS) in the pancreatic body and tail can induce parenchymal atrophy through chronic inflammatory changes presenting as a Hypoechoic area on EUS (Hypocho) or focal pancreatic parenchymal atrophy (FPPA) on computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). We herein discussed two patients with a hypoechoic area in the pancreatic head and neck on EUS resembling pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). The lesions consisted of dense fibrosis and fat infiltration with pancreatic parenchymal atrophy around the HG PanIN/CIS in the main pancreatic duct (MPD), which penetrated the lesion and showed mild stenosis and upstream dilation. CT and MRI were unable to visualize the lesions. A specimen was obtained from one lesion by fine-needle aspiration under EUS (EUS-FNA) guidance for histopathological and cytological analysis, but the tests returned negative for adenocarcinoma. However, serial pancreatic-juice aspiration cytologic examination (SPACE) revealed adenocarcinoma in both lesions, prompting surgical resection. Histopathological examination revealed non-invasive HG PanIN/CIS in the MPD surrounded by dense fibrosis and fat deposition in the area of parenchymal atrophy. The CIS was restricted to the area of parenchymal atrophy.These two cases are noteworthy in illustrating a hypoechoic area appearing on EUS as a tumor-like lesion resembling PDAC. EUS-FNA has recently been used histopathologically to diagnose a pancreatic lesion. However, in the present and similar cases, EUS-FNA can only reveal secondary changes due to CIS unless the pancreatic duct covered by the CIS is accidentally punctured. We should bear in mind that CIS can appear as a hypoechoic area resembling PDAC on EUS, and that SPACE is the best method for diagnosing CIS in such cases.

Prognostic impact of chemoradiation-related lymphopenia in patients with gastric and gastroesophageal cancer.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 249-249
Author(s):  
Daniel W Kim ◽  
Grace Lee ◽  
Theodore S. Hong ◽  
Guichao Li ◽  
Eric Roeland ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prognostic Factor ◽  
Cox Model ◽  
Gastroesophageal Junction ◽  
Concurrent Chemotherapy ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Prognostic Impact ◽  
Poor Prognostic Factor ◽  
Risk Of Death ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Ecog Ps

249 Background: Limited data exists on how chemoradiation (CRT)-induced lymphopenia affects survival outcomes in patients with gastric and gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) cancer. We evaluated the association between severe lymphopenia and its association with survival in gastric and GEJ cancer patients treated with CRT. We hypothesized that severe lymphopenia would be a poor prognostic factor. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of 154 patients with stage 1-3 gastric or GEJ cancer who underwent CRT at our institution. Patients underwent photon-based radiation therapy (RT) with a median dose of 50.4 Gy (IQR 45.0-50.4 Gy) over 28 fractions and concurrent chemotherapy (CTX) with carboplatin/paclitaxel, 5-fluorouracil based regimen, or capecitabine. 49% received CTX prior to RT. 84% underwent surgical resection, 57% pre-CRT and 26% post-CRT. Absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) at baseline and at 2 months since initiating RT were analyzed. Severe lymphopenia, defined as Grade 3 or worse lymphopenia (ALC < 0.5 k/μl), was analyzed for any association with overall survival (OS). Results: Median time of follow up was 48 months. Median age was 65. 77% were male and 86% were Caucasian. ECOG PS was 0 or 1 in 90% and 2 in 10%. Tumor location was stomach in 38% and GEJ in 62%. Timing of CRT was preoperative among 68% and postoperative among 32%. The median ALC at baseline for the entire cohort was 1.6 k/ul (range 0.3-7.0 k/ul). At 2 months post-CRT, 49 (32%) patients had severe lymphopenia. Patients with severe lymphopenia post-CRT had a slightly lower baseline TLC compared to patients without severe lymphopenia (median TLC 1.4 k/ul vs. 1.6 k/ul; p = 0.005). There were no differences in disease and treatment characteristics between the two groups. On the multivariable Cox model, severe lymphopenia post-CRT was significantly associated with increased risk of death (HR = 3.99 [95% CI 1.55-10.28], p = 0.004). ECOG PS 2 (HR = 34.97 [95% CI 2.08-587.73], p = 0.014) and postoperative CRT (HR = 5.55 [95% CI 1.29-23.86], p = 0.021) also predicted worse OS. The 4-year OS among patients with severe lymphopenia was 41% vs. 61% among patients with vs. without severe lymphopenia (log-rank test p = 0.041). Conclusions: Severe lymphopenia significantly correlated with poorer OS in patients with gastric or GEJ cancer treated with CRT. CRT-induced lymphopenia may be an important prognostic factor for survival in this patient population. Closer observation in high-risk patients and treatment modifications may be potential approaches to mitigating CRT-induced lymphopenia.

scholarly journals Impact of cytogenetics on the outcome of adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia: results of Southwest Oncology Group 9400 study

Blood ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 111 (5) ◽  
pp. 2563-2572 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vinod Pullarkat ◽  
Marilyn L. Slovak ◽  
Kenneth J. Kopecky ◽  
Stephen J. Forman ◽  
Frederick R. Appelbaum
Keyword(s):  
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Prognostic Factor ◽  
Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Significant Prognostic Factor ◽  
Prognostic Impact ◽  
Oncology Group ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Southwest Oncology Group ◽  
Hazard Ratios

We examined the prognostic impact of cytogenetics on the outcome of 200 acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) patients 15 to 65 years of age enrolled in Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG)–9400 study. Evaluable cytogenetics or fluorescence in situ hybridization studies were available in 140 (70%) patients. Four karyotype categories (normal [n = 31, 22%], t(9;22)/BCR/ABL1 [n = 36, 26%], other unfavorable [−7, +8, or 11q23 rearrangement, n = 19, 13%], and miscellaneous [n = 54, 39%]) and the biologically and clinically relevant ALL ploidy subgroups were prospectively defined. Overall survival (OS) decreased significantly with increasing age (P = .009) and varied with karyotype category (P < .001). OS was worst for t(9;22)/BCR/ABL1 followed by other unfavorable karyotypes, with hazard ratios (HR) of 3.45 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.88-6.31) and 2.14 (95% CI, 1.04-4.04), respectively, compared with normal diploid group. OS of the miscellaneous group was similar to that of the normal diploid group (HR = 0.82; 95% CI, 0.44-1.53). Relapse-free survival (RFS) was not significantly associated with age (P = .30) but was heterogeneous among karyotype categories (P < .001) primarily because of poor RFS in t(9;22)/BCR/ABL1 (HR = 3.49; 95% CI, 1.80-6.75) compared with the normal diploid group. After accounting for the variation among karyotype groups, age was not a significant prognostic factor for OS or RFS, highlighting cytogenetics as the most important prognostic factor in adult ALL. This trial was registered at www.ClinicalTrials.gov as #NCT00002665.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document