scholarly journals GW26-e4499 Long-term Outcome and the Mechanisms of Pulmonary Antrum Radial-linear Ablation in Patients with Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation

2015 ◽  
Vol 66 (16) ◽  
pp. C183
Author(s):  
Xue Zhao ◽  
Dening liao ◽  
Xingui Guo ◽  
Yawei Xu ◽  
Yanzhou Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Term Outcome ◽  
Long Term Outcome ◽  
Linear Ablation

Abstract 18649: Long-term Outcome and the Mechanisms of Pulmonary Antrum Radial-linear Ablation in Patients With Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation

Circulation ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 132 (suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Xue Zhao ◽  
Jianqiang Hu ◽  
Yan Huang ◽  
Yawei Xu ◽  
Yanzhou Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Holter Monitoring ◽  
Pericardial Tamponade ◽  
Term Outcome ◽  
Long Term Outcome ◽  
Long Term Follow Up ◽  
One Year

Objectives: The aim of this study was to determine the mechanisms and effectiveness of pulmonary antrum radial-linear (PAR) ablation in comparison with pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) after a long-term follow-up. Background: The one-year follow up data suggested that PAR ablation appeared to have a better outcome over the conventional PVI for paroxysmal AF. Methods: The enrollment occurred between March, 2011, and August, 2011, with the last follow-up in May, 2014. A total of 133 patients with documented paroxysmal AF were enrolled from 5 centers and randomized to PAR group or PVI group. Event ECG recorder and Holter monitoring were conductedduring the follow-up for all patients. Results: The average procedure time was 151±23 min in PAR group and 178±43 min in PVI group ( P <0.001). The average fluoroscopy time was 21±7 min in PAR group and 27±11 min in PVI group ( P= 0.002). AF triggering foci were eliminated in 59 patients (89.4%) in PAR group, whereas, only 4 patients (6.0%) in PVI group (P<0.001).At median 36 (37-35) months of follow-up after single ablation procedure, 43 of 66 patients in PAR group (65%) and 28 of 67 patients in PVI group (42%) had no recurrence of AF off antiarrhythmic drug (AAD) (P=0.007); and 47 of 66 patients in PAR group (71%) and 32 of 67 patients in PVI group (48%) had no recurrence of AF with AAD (P=0.006). At the last follow-up, the burden of AF was significantly lower in PAR group than in PVI group (0.9% ± 2.3% vs 4.9% ± 9.9%;90th percentile, 5.5% vs 19.6%; P=0.008). No major adverse event (death, stroke, PV stenosis) was observed in all the patients except one case of pericardial tamponade. Conclusions: PAR ablation is a simple, safe, and effective strategy for the treatment of paroxysmal AF with better long-term outcome than PVI. PAR ablation might exhibit the beneficial effect on AF management through multiple mechanisms. Registration: ChiCTR-TRC-11001191

Long-term outcome after catheter ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: Impact of different atrial fibrillation foci

2017 ◽  
Vol 227 ◽  
pp. 407-412 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masateru Takigawa ◽  
Atsushi Takahashi ◽  
Taishi Kuwahara ◽  
Kenji Okubo ◽  
Yoshihide Takahashi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Catheter Ablation ◽  
Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Term Outcome ◽  
Long Term Outcome

scholarly journals Very long term outcome after linear versus electrogram guided ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Seigo Yamashita ◽  
Michifumi Tokuda ◽  
Saagar Mahida ◽  
Hidenori Sato ◽  
Hirotsugu Ikewaki ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Multivariable Analysis ◽  
Persistent Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Logrank Test ◽  
Term Outcome ◽  
Long Term Outcome ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Linear Ablation

AbstractThe optimal ablation strategy for persistent atrial fibrillation (PsAF) remains to be defined. We sought to compare very long-term outcomes between linear ablation and electrogram (EGM)-guided ablation for PsAF. In a retrospective analysis, long-term arrhythmia-free survival compared between two propensity-score matched cohorts, one with pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) and linear ablation including roof/mitral isthmus line (LINE-group, n = 52) and one with PVI and EGM-guided ablation (EGM-group; n = 52). Overall, 99% of patients underwent successful PVI. Complete block following linear ablation was achieved for 94% of roof lines and 81% of mitral lines (both lines blocked in 75%). AF termination by EGM-guided ablation was accomplished in 40% of patients. Non-PV foci were targeted in 7 (13%) in the LINE-group and 5 (10%) patients in the EGM-group (p = 0.76). During 100 ± 28 months of follow-up, linear ablation was associated with superior arrhythmia-free survival after the initial and last procedure (1.8 ± 0.9 procedures) compared with EGM-group (Logrank test: p = 0.0001 and p = 0.045, respectively). In multivariable analysis, longer AF duration and EGM-guided ablation remained as independent predictors of atrial arrhythmia recurrence. Linear ablation might be a more effective complementary technique to PVI than EGM-guided ablation for PsAF ablation.

scholarly journals Very Long-term Outcome after Linear vs. Electrogram-guided Ablation for Persistent Atrial Fibrillation: A Propensity Score-matched Analysis.

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Seigo Yamashita ◽  
Michifumi Tokuda ◽  
Saagar Mahida ◽  
Hidenori Sato ◽  
Hidetsugu Ikewaki ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Propensity Score ◽  
Multivariable Analysis ◽  
Persistent Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Logrank Test ◽  
Term Outcome ◽  
Long Term Outcome ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Linear Ablation

Background: The optimal ablation strategy for persistent atrial fibrillation (PsAF) remains to be defined. We sought to compare very long-term outcomes between linear ablation and electrogram (EGM)-guided ablation for PsAF. Methods: In a retrospective analysis, long-term arrhythmia-free survival compared between two propensity-score matched cohorts, one with pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) and linear ablation including roof/mitral isthmus line (LINE-group, n=52) and one with PVI and EGM-guided ablation (EGM-group; n=52). Results: Overall, 99% of patients underwent successful PVI. Complete block following linear ablation was achieved for 94% of roof lines and 81% of mitral lines (both lines blocked in 75%). AF termination by EGM-guided ablation was accomplished in 40% of patients. Non-PV foci were targeted in 7 (13%) in the LINE-group and 5 (10%) patients in the EGM-group (p=0.76). During 100±28 months of follow-up, linear ablation was associated with superior arrhythmia-free survival after the initial and last procedure (1.8±0.9 procedures) compared with EGM-group (Logrank test: P=0.0001 and P=0.045, respectively). In multivariable analysis, longer AF duration and EGM-guided ablation remained as independent predictors of AAs recurrence. Conclusions: Linear ablation is a more effective complementary technique to PVI than EGM-guided ablation for PsAF ablation.

scholarly journals Impact of baseline left atrial function on long-term outcome after catheter ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation

2020 ◽  
Vol 75 (4) ◽  
pp. 352-359
Author(s):  
Takafumi Oka ◽  
Koji Tanaka ◽  
Yuichi Ninomiya ◽  
Yuko Hirao ◽  
Nobuaki Tanaka ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Catheter Ablation ◽  
Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Left Atrial ◽  
Atrial Function ◽  
Left Atrial Function ◽  
Term Outcome ◽  
Long Term Outcome

Pulmonary vein isolation: The impact of pulmonary venous anatomy on long-term outcome of catheter ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation

Heart Rhythm ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 549-556 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alex J.A. McLellan ◽  
Liang-han Ling ◽  
Diego Ruggiero ◽  
Michael C.G. Wong ◽  
Tomos E. Walters ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Catheter Ablation ◽  
Pulmonary Vein ◽  
Pulmonary Vein Isolation ◽  
Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Venous Anatomy ◽  
Term Outcome ◽  
Long Term Outcome ◽  
The Impact

Abstract 15733: Long-Term Follow-Up of Patients With Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation and Severe Left Atrial Scarring: Comparison Between Pulmonary Vein Antrum Isolation Only or PVAI Combined With Either Scar Homogenization or Trigger Ablation

Circulation ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 132 (suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sanghamitra Mohanty ◽  
Prasant Mohanty ◽  
Luigi Di Biase ◽  
Chintan Trivedi ◽  
Rong Bai ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Left Atrial ◽  
Pulmonary Veins ◽  
Term Outcome ◽  
Long Term Outcome ◽  
Group 3 ◽  
Group 2

Background: Left atrial (LA) scarring, a consequence of cardiac fibrosis is a powerful predictor of procedure-outcome in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients undergoing catheter ablation. We sought to compare the long-term outcome in patients with paroxysmal AF and severe LA scarring/fibrosis identified by 3D mapping undergoing ablation of the pulmonary veins (PVAI) only or PVAI and the entire scar areas (scar homogenization) or PVAI plus ablation of the non-PV triggers. Methods: One-hundred seventy seven consecutive patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation and severe left atrial scarring were included in this study. LA scarring was diagnosed by 3D voltage mapping. The degree of scar was described as severe when >60% of the LA area was involved. Non-PV triggers were defined as ectopic triggers originating from sites other than pulmonary veins such as interatrial septum, superior vena cava, left atrial appendage, ligament of Marshall, crista terminalis and coronary sinus. Patients underwent ablation of the pulmonary vein antrum (PVAI) only (n=45, group 1), PVAI extended to the entire scar areas (scar homogenization [n=66, group 2]) or PVAI plus ablation of non-PV triggers (n=66, group 3). Choice of ablation strategy was determined by the operator. Patients were followed up for arrhythmia recurrence with event recorders, ECG and Holter monitoring. Results: Baseline characteristics were not different between the groups (age 63±9 vs 58±10 vs. 60±11 years, p=0.23; male 71%, vs. 72% vs. 73% p= 0.91). After a single procedure, all patients were followed-up for a minimum of two years. The long-term success rate at the end of the follow up was 19% (12 pts) in group 1, 21% (14 pts) in group 2, and 61% (40 pts) in group 3. Kaplan-Meier log-rank test indicated that the cumulative probability of AF-free survival was significantly higher in group 3 (overall log-rank p <0.001, pairwise comparison 1 vs. 3 and 2 vs. 3 was significant at p<0.01). Conclusions: In patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation and severe left atrial scarring, PVAI plus ablation of non-PV triggers is associated with significantly better long-term outcome than PVAI alone or when PVAI is combined with scar homogenization.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document