scholarly journals Angiotensin Receptor-Neprilysin Inhibition Based on History of Heart Failure and Use of Renin-Angiotensin System Antagonists

2020 ◽  
Vol 76 (9) ◽  
pp. 1034-1048 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew P. Ambrosy ◽  
Eugene Braunwald ◽  
David A. Morrow ◽  
Adam D. DeVore ◽  
Kevin McCague ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
Gerasimos Filippatos ◽  
Stefan D. Anker ◽  
Rajiv Agarwal ◽  
Bertram Pitt ◽  
Luis M. Ruilope ◽  
...  

Background: The FIDELIO-DKD trial evaluated the effect of the nonsteroidal, selective mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist finerenone on kidney and cardiovascular (CV) outcomes in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and type 2 diabetes (T2D) with optimized renin-angiotensin system blockade. Compared with placebo, finerenone reduced the composite kidney and CV outcomes. We report the effect of finerenone on individual CV outcomes and in patients with and without history of atherosclerotic CV disease (CVD). Methods: This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial included patients with T2D and urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio 30-5000 mg/g and an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) ≥25-<75 mL/min/1.73 m 2 , treated with optimized renin-angiotensin system blockade. Patients with a history of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction were excluded. Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive finerenone or placebo. The composite CV outcome included time to CV death, myocardial infarction, stroke, or hospitalization for heart failure. Prespecified CV analyses included analyses of the components of this composite and outcomes according to CVD history at baseline. Results: Between September 2015 and June 2018, 13,911 patients were screened and 5674 were randomized; 45.9% of patients had CVD at baseline. Over a median follow-up of 2.6 years (interquartile range, 2.0-3.4 years), finerenone reduced the risk of the composite CV outcome compared with placebo (hazard ratio [HR], 0.86; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.75-0.99; P=0.034), with no significant interaction between patients with and without CVD (HR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.71-1.01 in patients with a history of CVD; HR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.68-1.08 in patients without a history of CVD; P-value for interaction, 0.85). The incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events was similar between treatment arms, with a low incidence of hyperkalemia-related permanent treatment discontinuation (2.3% with finerenone vs 0.8% with placebo in patients with CVD and 2.2% with finerenone vs 1.0% with placebo in patients without CVD). Conclusions: Among patients with CKD and T2D, finerenone reduced incidence of the composite CV outcome, with no evidence of differences in treatment effect based on pre-existing CVD status. Clinical Trial Registration: URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov Unique Identifier: NCT02540993 (Funded by Bayer AG)


Heart ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. heartjnl-2021-319405
Author(s):  
Rishi J Desai ◽  
Elisabetta Patorno ◽  
Muthiah Vaduganathan ◽  
Mufaddal Mahesri ◽  
Kristyn Chin ◽  
...  

ObjectiveTo evaluate the effectiveness of angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI) versus renin-angiotensin system (RAS) blockade alone in older adults with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF).MethodsWe conducted a cohort study using US Medicare fee-for-service claims data (2014–2017). Patients with HFrEF ≥65 years were identified in two cohorts: (1) initiators of ARNI or RAS blockade alone (ACE inhibitor, ACEI; or angiotensin receptor blocker, ARB) and (2) switchers from an ACEI to either ARNI or ARB. HR with 95% CI from Cox proportional hazard regression and 1-year restricted mean survival time (RMST) difference with 95% CI were calculated for a composite outcome of time to first worsening heart failure event or all-cause mortality after adjustment for 71 pre-exposure characteristics through propensity score fine-stratification weighting. All analyses of initiator and switcher cohorts were conducted separately and then combined using fixed effects.Results51 208 patients with a mean age of 76 years were included, with 16 193 in the ARNI group. Adjusted HRs comparing ARNI with RAS blockade alone were 0.92 (95% CI 0.84 to 1.00) among initiators and 0.79 (95% CI 0.74 to 0.85) among switchers, with a combined estimate of 0.84 (95% CI 0.80 to 0.89). Adjusted 1-year RMST difference (95% CI) was 4 days in the initiator cohort (−1 to 9) and 12 days (8 to 17) in the switcher cohort, resulting in a pooled estimate of 9 days (6 to 12) favouring ARNI.ConclusionARNI treatment was associated with lower risk of a composite effectiveness endpoint compared with RAS blockade alone in older adults with HFrEF.


ESC CardioMed ◽  
2018 ◽  
pp. 161-167
Author(s):  
João Pedro Ferreira ◽  
Patrick Rossignol

The advent of drugs able to modulate the renin–angiotensin system (RAS), and more recently the neprilysin inhibitor sacubitril in combination with a RAS blocker, has improved the outcome of many cardiovascular and renal conditions. In particular, heart failure, post-myocardial infarction, and hypertension are the cardiovascular clinical syndromes in which RAS inhibition (and in heart failure, in combination with neprilysin inhibition) has greatly improved morbidity and mortality. This chapter aims to provide an appraisal of RAS and neprilysin inhibitors regarding their pharmacological properties with respect to mechanism(s) of action, pharmacokinetics, monitoring, adverse effects, and drug interactions.


ESC CardioMed ◽  
2018 ◽  
pp. 161-167 ◽  
Author(s):  
João Pedro Ferreira ◽  
Patrick Rossignol

The advent of drugs able to modulate the renin–angiotensin system (RAS), and more recently the neprilysin inhibitor sacubitril in combination with a RAS blocker, has improved the outcome of many cardiovascular and renal conditions. In particular, heart failure, post-myocardial infarction, and hypertension are the cardiovascular clinical syndromes in which RAS inhibition (and in heart failure, in combination with neprilysin inhibition) has greatly improved morbidity and mortality. This chapter aims to provide an appraisal of RAS and neprilysin inhibitors regarding their pharmacological properties with respect to mechanism(s) of action, pharmacokinetics, monitoring, adverse effects, and drug interactions.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document