TCT-48 Incidence and Outcomes of Atrial Fibrillation in Patients Undergoing TAVR Versus SAVR: Experience From SURTAVI and Low-Risk Randomized Studies

Background: While anticoagulant therapy is standard management for atrial fibrillation (Af), dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) is needed after stent implantation for coronary artery disease. HAS-BLED score estimates risk of major bleeding for patients on anticoagulation to assess risk-benefit in Af care. However, it is little known about usefulness of HAS-BLED score in Af patient treated with coronary stents requiring DAPT or DAPT plus warfarin (triple therapy: TT). The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of HAS-BLED score on major bleeding in Af patients undergoing DAPT or TT. Methods: A total of 837 consecutive patients were received PCI in our hospital from Jan. 2007 to Dec. 2010, and 66 patients had Af or paroxysmal Af at the time of PCI. Clinical events including major bleeding (cerebral or gastrointestinal bleeding) were investigated up to 3 years. Patients were divided into 2 groups based on HAS-BLED score (High-risk group: HAS-BLED score≥4, n=19 and Low-risk group: HAS-BLED score<4, n=47). DAPT therapy was required for a minimum 12 months after stent implantation and warfarin was prescribed based on physicians’ discretion. Management/change of antiplatelet and anticoagulant therapy during follow-up periods were also up to physicians’ discretion. Results: Baseline characteristics were not different between High-risk and Low-risk group except for age. Overall incidence of major bleeding was observed in 8 cases (12.1%) at 3 years follow-up. Major bleeding event was significantly higher in High-risk group compared with Low-risk group (31.6% vs. 4.3%, p=0.002). However, management of DAPT and TT was not different between the 2 groups. Among component of HAS-BLED score, renal dysfunction and bleeding contributed with increased number of the score. Conclusion: High-risk group was more frequently observed major bleeding events compared with Low-risk group in patients with Af following DES implantation regardless of antiplatelet/anticoagulant therapy.

Download Full-text

P9 Novel use of CHA2DS2VASC score to select patients to undergo repeat atrial fibrillation screening

European Heart Journal ◽

10.1093/ehjci/ehz872.015 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 41 (Supplement_1) ◽

Author(s):

W Sun ◽

B P Y Yan

Keyword(s):

Atrial Fibrillation ◽

High Risk ◽

Clinical Outcomes ◽

Cross Validation ◽

Risk Group ◽

Curve Analysis ◽

Low Risk ◽

Decision Curve Analysis ◽

Risk Patients

Abstract Background We have previously demonstrated unselected screening for atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients ≥65 years old in an out-patient setting yielded 1-2% new AF each time screen-negative patients underwent repeated screening at 12 to 18 month interval. Selection criteria to identify high-risk patients for repeated AF screening may be more efficient than repeat screening on all patients. Aims This study aimed to validate CHA2DS2VASC score as a predictive model to select target population for repeat AF screening. Methods 17,745 consecutive patients underwent 24,363 index AF screening (26.9% patients underwent repeated screening) using a handheld single-lead ECG (AliveCor) from Dec 2014 to Dec 2017 (NCT02409654). Adverse clinical outcomes to be predicted included (i) new AF detection by repeated screening; (ii) new AF clinically diagnosed during follow-up and (ii) ischemic stroke/transient ischemic attack (TIA) during follow-up. Performance evaluation and validation of CHA2DS2VASC score as a prediction model was based on 15,732 subjects, 35,643 person-years of follow-up and 765 outcomes. Internal validation was conducted by method of k-fold cross-validation (k = n = 15,732, i.e., Leave-One-Out cross-validation). Performance measures included c-index for discriminatory ability and decision curve analysis for clinical utility. Risk groups were defined as ≤1, 2-3, or ≥4 for CHA2DS2VASC scores. Calibration was assessed by comparing proportions of actual observed events. Results CHA2DS2VASC scores achieved acceptable discrimination with c-index of 0.762 (95%CI: 0.746-0.777) for derivation and 0.703 for cross-validation. Decision curve analysis showed the use of CHA2DS2VASC to select patients for rescreening was superior to rescreening all or no patients in terms of net benefit across all reasonable threshold probability (Figure 1, left). Predicted and observed probabilities of adverse clinical outcomes progressively increased with increasing CHA2DS2VASC score (Figure 1, right): 0.7% outcome events in low-risk group (CHA2DS2VASC ≤1, predicted prob. ≤0.86%), 3.5% intermediate-risk group (CHA2DS2VASC 2-3, predicted prob. 2.62%-4.43%) and 11.3% in high-risk group (CHA2DS2VASC ≥4, predicted prob. ≥8.50%). The odds ratio for outcome events were 4.88 (95%CI: 3.43-6.96) for intermediate-versus-low risk group, and 17.37 (95%CI: 12.36-24.42) for high-versus-low risk group. Conclusion Repeat AF screening on high-risk population may be more efficient than rescreening all screen-negative individuals. CHA2DS2VASC scores may be used as a selection tool to identify high-risk patients to undergo repeat AF screening. Abstract P9 Figure 1

Download Full-text

Stepwise mass screening for atrial fibrillation using N-terminal B-type natriuretic peptide: the STROKESTOP II study

EP Europace ◽

10.1093/europace/euz255 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 22 (1) ◽

pp. 24-32 ◽

Cited By ~ 12

Author(s):

Katrin Kemp Gudmundsdottir ◽

Tove Fredriksson ◽

Emma Svennberg ◽

Faris Al-Khalili ◽

Leif Friberg ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Atrial Fibrillation ◽

High Risk ◽

Natriuretic Peptide ◽

Oral Anticoagulant ◽

Risk Group ◽

High Risk Group ◽

Low Risk ◽

Screening Procedure ◽

Anticoagulant Treatment ◽

Oral Anticoagulant Treatment

Abstract Aims To study the prevalence of unknown atrial fibrillation (AF) in a high-risk, 75/76-year-old, population using N-terminal B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) and handheld electrocardiogram (ECG) recordings in a stepwise screening procedure. Methods and results The STROKESTOP II study is a population-based cohort study in which all 75/76-year-old in the Stockholm region (n = 28 712) were randomized 1:1 to be invited to an AF screening programme or to serve as the control group. Participants without known AF had NT-proBNP analysed and were stratified into low-risk (NT-proBNP <125 ng/L) and high-risk (NT-proBNP ≥125 ng/L) groups. The high-risk group was offered extended ECG-screening, whereas the low-risk group performed only one single-lead ECG recording. In total, 6868 individuals accepted the screening invitation of which 6315 (91.9%) did not have previously known AF. New AF was detected in 2.6% [95% confidence interval (CI) 2.2–3.0] of all participants without previous AF. In the high-risk group (n = 3766/6315, 59.6%), AF was diagnosed in 4.4% (95% CI 3.7–5.1) of the participants. Out of these, 18% had AF on their index-ECG. In the low-risk group, one participant was diagnosed with AF on index-ECG. The screening procedure resulted in an increase in known prevalence from 8.1% to 10.5% among participants. Oral anticoagulant treatment was initiated in 94.5% of the participants with newly diagnosed AF. Conclusion N-terminal B-type natriuretic peptide-stratified systematic screening for AF identified 4.4% of the high-risk participants with new AF. Oral anticoagulant treatment initiation was well accepted in the group diagnosed with new AF.

Download Full-text

Long-term impact of catheter ablation on arrhythmia burden in low-risk patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: The CLOSE to CURE study

Heart Rhythm ◽

10.1016/j.hrthm.2019.11.004 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 17 (4) ◽

pp. 535-543 ◽

Cited By ~ 9

Author(s):

Mattias Duytschaever ◽

Jan De Pooter ◽

Anthony Demolder ◽

Milad El Haddad ◽

Thomas Phlips ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Atrial Fibrillation ◽

Catheter Ablation ◽

Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation ◽

Low Risk ◽

Risk Patients ◽

Long Term Impact

Download Full-text

Antithrombotic Therapy in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Where Are We Now?

Annals of Pharmacotherapy ◽

10.1177/1060028018766837 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 52 (9) ◽

pp. 884-897 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Ryan G. D’Angelo ◽

Thaddeus McGiness ◽

Laura H. Waite

Keyword(s):

Atrial Fibrillation ◽

Percutaneous Coronary Intervention ◽

Triple Therapy ◽

Bleeding Risk ◽

Coronary Intervention ◽

Low Risk ◽

Current Evidence ◽

Patient Specific ◽

Coronary Syndrome ◽

Percutaneous Coronary

Objective: To synthesize the literature and provide guidance to practitioners regarding double therapy (DT) and triple therapy (TT) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) requiring percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Data Sources: PubMed and MEDLINE (January 2000 to February 2018) were searched using the following terms: atrial fibrillation, myocardial infarction, acute coronary syndrome, percutaneous coronary intervention, anticoagulation, dual-antiplatelet therapy, clopidogrel, aspirin, ticagrelor, prasugrel, and triple therapy. Study Selection and Data Extraction: The results included randomized and nonrandomized clinical trials and meta-analyses. Each study was reported based on study design, population, intervention, comparator, and key cardiovascular (CV) and bleeding outcomes. Data Synthesis: A total of 15 studies were included in the review. The majority of studies evaluating DT and TT utilized clopidogrel and warfarin as components of the regimen, although there are emerging data with newer agents. Evidence purporting DT regimens to be equally effective in preventing CV events and improved safety profiles compared with TT regimens included populations with relatively low risk for recurrent CV events, and many of these studies were observational in nature. Overall, current evidence as well as American and European guidelines support the use of TT in patients with AF who require PCI for the least possible amount of time, depending on patient-specific factors involving bleeding and thrombosis. Conclusions: In the majority of patients with AF who require PCI, TT should be used for the shortest period of time possible. DT regimens may be used in patients requiring PCI who have low risk for thrombosis and/or high bleeding risk.

Download Full-text