scholarly journals An Atrial Fibrillation Transitions of Care Clinic Improves Atrial Fibrillation Quality Metrics

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 45-52 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bryan Q. Abadie ◽  
Benjamin Hansen ◽  
Jennifer Walker ◽  
Zachariah Deyo ◽  
Kevin Biese ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
Stavros Stavrakis ◽  
Khaled Elkholey ◽  
Marty M. Lofgren ◽  
Zain U. A. Asad ◽  
Lancer D. Stephens ◽  
...  

Background American Indian adults have a higher risk of atrial fibrillation (AF) compared with other racial groups. We implemented opportunistic screening to detect silent AF in American Indian adults attending a tribal health system using a mobile, single‐lead ECG device. Methods and Results American Indian patients aged ≥50 years followed in a tribal primary care clinic with no history of AF underwent a 30‐second ECG. A cardiologist overread all tracings to confirm the diagnosis of AF. After AF was confirmed, patients were referred to their primary care physician for initiation of anticoagulation. Patients seen over the same time period, who were not undergoing screening, served as controls. A total of 1019 patients received AF screening (mean age, 61.5±8.9 years, 62% women). Age and sex distribution of those screened was similar to the overall clinic population. New AF was diagnosed in 15 of 1019 (1.5%) patients screened versus 4 of 1267 (0.3%) patients who were not screened (mean difference, 1.2%; 95% CI, 0.3%–2.2%, P =0.002). Eight of 15 with new screen‐detected AF were aged <65 years. Those with screen‐detected AF were slightly older and had a higher CHA 2 DS 2 ‐VASc score than those without AF. Fourteen of 15 patients diagnosed with new AF had a CHA 2 DS 2 ‐VASc score ≥1 and initiated anticoagulation. Conclusions Opportunistic, mobile single‐lead ECG screening for AF is feasible in tribal clinics, and detects more AF than usual care, leading to appropriate initiation of anticoagulation. AF develops at a younger age in American Indian adults who would likely benefit from earlier AF screening. Registration URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT03740477.


2017 ◽  
Vol 43 (3) ◽  
pp. 127-137 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicholas A. Rattray ◽  
Jason J. Sico ◽  
LeeAnn M. Cox ◽  
Alissa L. Russ ◽  
Marianne S. Matthias ◽  
...  

Heart ◽  
2020 ◽  
pp. heartjnl-2020-317418
Author(s):  
Melissa E Middeldorp ◽  
Aashray Gupta ◽  
Adrian Elliott ◽  
Kadhim Kadhim ◽  
Anand Thiyagarajah ◽  
...  

ObjectiveTo characterise the rate, causes and predictors of cessation of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF).Patients and methodsConsecutive patients with AF with a long-term anticoagulation indication treated with NOACs (dabigatran, apixaban and rivaroxaban) in our centre from September 2010 through December 2016 were included. Prospectively collected data with baseline characteristics, causes of cessation, mean duration-to-cessation and predictors of cessation were analysed.ResultsThe study comprised 1415 consecutive patients with AF, of whom 439 had a CHA2DS2-VASc≥1 and were on a NOAC. Mean age was 71.9±8.7 years and 37% were females. Over a median follow-up of 3.6 years (IQR=2.7–5.3), 147 (33.5%) patients ceased their index-NOAC (113 switched to a different form of OAC), at a rate of 8.8 per 100 patient-years. Serious adverse events warranting NOAC cessation occurred in 28 patients (6.4%) at a rate of 1.6 events per 100 patient-years. The mean duration-to-cessation was 4.9 years (95% CI 4.6 to 5.1) and apixaban had the longest duration-to-cessation with (5.1, 95% CI 4.8 to 5.4) years, compared with dabigatran (4.6, 95% CI 4.2 to 4.9) and rivaroxaban (4.5, 95% CI 3.9 to 5.1), pairwise log-rank p=0.002 and 0.025, respectively. In multivariable analyses, age was an independent predictor of index-NOAC cessation (HR 1.03, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.05; p=0.006). Female gender (HR 2.2, 95% CI 1.04 to 4.64; p=0.04) independently predicted serious adverse events.ConclusionIn this ‘real world’ cohort, NOAC use is safe and well-tolerated when prescribed in an integrated care clinic. Whether apixaban is better tolerated compared with other NOACs warrants further study.


SLEEP ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 44 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. A150-A150
Author(s):  
Cassandra Godzik ◽  
Adam Sorscher

Abstract Introduction Insomnia is highly prevalent in adult populations, with rates found to be between 10% and 40% as reported in a metanalysis conducted by Zhang et al. (2019). Insomnia is associated with worsened health outcomes and increased healthcare utilization. Primary care providers (PCPs) are the first point of contact for most people seeking treatment for insomnia. The American Academy of Sleep Medicine has proposed six quality metrics for the evaluation and treatment of insomnia (Edinger et al., 2015). In this study, we investigate how often primary care providers meet these quality metrics when they encounter a patient with a new complaint of insomnia. Methods We reviewed the charts of adult patients seen in our primary care clinic department with a new presenting complaint of insomnia between 2014–2016. The clinic notes were scored to see if any of the six metrics of quality care for insomnia as proposed by the AASM were addressed in the index appointment (T1) and in follow up appointments (T2) within three months. Results Demographic variables were analyzed (N=155; 48 males, 107 females); mean age 64 years (range 24–98). We found that PCPs documented the following: at T1, assessment of sleep quality (68%), evidence-based treatment provided (82%), daytime functioning assessed (19%), and adverse side effects assessed (11%). 29% of subjects returned for a follow up visit with 3 months. At T2, there was an assessment of sleep satisfaction/quality (40%), and of improved daytime functioning (87%). Conclusion Presently, evaluation and treatment of insomnia by PCPs is not standardized. By identifying how providers address insomnia in practice, we can develop interventions to help promote adherence to the national guidelines for treatment of insomnia in a non-sleep medicine healthcare setting. Support (if any) Dr. Cassandra M. Godzik’s Postdoctoral Research Fellowship: NIMH - T32 MH073553


Author(s):  
Redah Z Mahmood ◽  
Sherry M Bumpus ◽  
Daniel G Montgomery ◽  
Eva Kline-Rogers ◽  
James B Froehlich ◽  
...  

Background: BRIDGE is a nurse practitioner (NP) based transitional care program for cardiac patients(pts) discharged from a large tertiary care health system. Attendance at the BRIDGE clinic has been shown to reduce early readmission and ED visits for acute coronary syndrome (ACS) pts. Little is known about causes of readmission for atrial fibrillation (AF) pts and whether an NP based program affects overall readmissions. Methods: Retrospective data on 1188 pts was abstracted from 2008 to 2010 for pts referred to BRIDGE. Early (30 day) readmission of pts with discharge diagnosis of AF underwent qualitative chart audit by a trained MD abstractor. When examining if BRIDGE affected readmissions, we excluded pts with ED visits/readmits prior to BRIDGE. Results: Median time to BRIDGE was 16 days. Of 1010 with complete data, 148 (15%) had a discharge diagnosis of AF; 110/148 (74%) AF pts attended BRIDGE. Thirty day readmission (30DR) for AF was 23% (34/148); 17/34 (57%) were sent to the ED by a MD or nurse. Attending BRIDGE had no effect on outcomes at all time points (table 1); 17 patients were readmitted before BRIDGE. Readmission at 6 months for AF was 41% for those who attended BRIDGE, 29% for those who did not (p=0.190). Table 2 details reasons for all 30DR in AF pts. Chart review demonstrated that all 30DR were appropriate, 83% (25/30) of non-elective readmissions were unavoidable, and of 5 potentially avoidable readmissions, 2 were due to patient non-compliance. Conclusions: 30-day readmission rates are high for pts recently discharged with a diagnosis of AF and most are unavoidable. A NP based transitional care clinic successful in reducing 30 day readmissions for ACS pts did not prevent either early or late readmissions in AF pts.


Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 142 (Suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sunil Saith ◽  
anuragh trikha ◽  
Tamta Chkhikvadze ◽  
Ciril Khorolsky ◽  
June Ha ◽  
...  

Background: The H2FPEF score is a validated scoring system to determine whether dyspnea may be due to heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Recent evidence has suggested that H2FPEF scoring system may correlate with outcomes in established HFpEF. Its utilization for estimating mortality in patients who die within one year of discharge is not known. Methods: We collected clinical demographics and echocardiographic parameters from reports to calculate H2FPEF scores for 301 patients admitted with decompensated HFpEF between August 2016 and 2017. Patients were included if an echocardiographic report was available within 3 months, confirming an ejection fraction > 50%. E/E’ and filling pressures were scored as 0 if not recorded in the echocardiographic report. Results: Median age was 81 years (IQR: 71-89), with 62.9% female. One-year follow-up was confirmed for 268 patients, with 56 deaths (20.9%). Receiver operating curve analysis suggest borderline significance of H2FPEF in predicting one-year mortality (area under curve, 0.576, 95% CI: 0.493-0.658, p=0.073). Optimal H2FPEF cutpoint score was 4.5 (73% sensitivity, 50% specificity). On univariate analysis, body mass index (BMI) > 30, hypertension, atrial fibrillation (p<0.001) and pulmonary artery systemic pressure > 35 mmHg (p=0.038) were associated with one-year mortality. On stepwise logistic regression, only BMI > 30 and atrial fibrillation remained associated with mortality in multivariate analysis. Conclusion: The utilization of H2FPEF in established HFpEF might confer some ability to predict one-year mortality, driven by obesity (2 points) and atrial fibrillation (3 points). Validation in larger cohorts with longer follow-up is necessary to establish its potential role in discharge planning and transitions of care of decompensated HFpEF.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document