Long-Term Oncologic Outcomes from Laparoscopic Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: A Single-Center Experience of 601 Consecutive Resections

2010 ◽  
Vol 211 (1) ◽  
pp. 33-40 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sang-Woong Lee ◽  
Eiji Nomura ◽  
George Bouras ◽  
Takaya Tokuhara ◽  
Souichiro Tsunemi ◽  
...  
2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (7) ◽  
pp. 627-633 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hyung-Ho Kim ◽  
Sang-Uk Han ◽  
Min-Chan Kim ◽  
Woo Jin Hyung ◽  
Wook Kim ◽  
...  

Purpose The oncologic outcomes of laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy for the treatment of gastric cancer have not been evaluated. The aim of this study is to validate the efficacy and safety of laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer in terms of long-term survival, morbidity, and mortality retrospectively. Patients and Methods The study group comprised 2,976 patients who were treated with curative intent either by laparoscopic gastrectomy (1,477 patients) or open gastrectomy (1,499 patients) between April 1998 and December 2005. The long-term 5-year actual survival analysis in case-control and case-matched population was conducted using the Kaplan-Meier method. The morbidity and mortality and learning curves were evaluated. Results In the case-control study, the overall survival, disease-specific survival, and recurrence-free survival (median follow-up period, 70.8 months) were not statistically different at each cancer stage with the exception of an increased overall survival rate for patients with stage IA cancer treated via laparoscopy (laparoscopic group; 95.3%, open group: 90.3%; P < .001). After matching using a propensity scoring system, the overall survival, disease-specific survival, and recurrence-free survival rates were not statistically different at each stage. The morbidity of the case-matched group was 15.1% in the open group and 12.5% in the laparoscopic group, which also had no statistical significance (P = .184). The mortality rate was also not statistically significant (0.3% in the open group and 0.5% in the laparoscopic group; P = 1.000). The mean learning curve was 42. Conclusion The long-term oncologic outcomes of laparoscopic gastrectomy for patients with gastric cancer were comparable to those of open gastrectomy in a large-scale, multicenter, retrospective clinical study.


2013 ◽  
Vol 27 (11) ◽  
pp. 4250-4258 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mun Ki Choi ◽  
Gwang Ha Kim ◽  
Do Youn Park ◽  
Geun Am Song ◽  
Dong Uk Kim ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 71 (5) ◽  
pp. AB263
Author(s):  
Suji Shin ◽  
Yu Jin Kim ◽  
Jun Chul Park ◽  
Hyun Soo Chung ◽  
Sung Kwan Shin ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 8-8
Author(s):  
Woo Jin Hyung ◽  
Kazutaka Obama ◽  
Yu Min Kim ◽  
Yanghee Woo ◽  
Kyung Ho Pak ◽  
...  

8 Background: Although robotic gastrectomy (RG) showed satisfactory early postoperative outcomes, the oncologic safety of RG for gastric cancer remains a concern. We aimed to evaluate the oncologic safety of RG by comparing its long term outcomes with that of laparoscopic gastrectomy (LG). Methods: From July 2005 to December 2009, we performed 313 RGs and 524 LGs to the patients with gastric cancer. We retrospectively analyzed the patients’ characteristics, operative outcomes, overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS), then compared between RG and LG groups using a prospectively maintained database. Results: With a median follow-up of 46 (1-80) months, there was no difference in the OS (log-rank p=0.625) nor in the RFS (p=0.761) between the two groups. When we compared the two groups stage by stage, the OS and RFS also did not differ significantly. Postoperative recurrence was observed in 17 patients (5.4%) in RG and 18 (3.4%) in LG, which showed no significant difference (p=0.745). The pattern of recurrence in RG showed 5 peritoneal, 5 loco-regional, 3 hematogenous,3 distant lymph node, and 1 mixed one. The recurence pattern of the two groups did not differ significantly. Conclusions: These data suggest that robotic assistance in gastrectomy for gastric cancer is acceptable because the oncologic outcome of RG was comparable to conventional LG in our experience.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document