Carbohydrate Antigen 19-9 Elevation in Anatomically Resectable, Early Stage Pancreatic Cancer Is Independently Associated with Decreased Overall Survival and an Indication for Neoadjuvant Therapy: A National Cancer Database Study

2016 ◽  
Vol 223 (1) ◽  
pp. 52-65 ◽  
Author(s):  
John R. Bergquist ◽  
Carlos A. Puig ◽  
Christopher R. Shubert ◽  
Ryan T. Groeschl ◽  
Elizabeth B. Habermann ◽  
...  
Medicina ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 57 (1) ◽  
pp. 77
Author(s):  
Nathalie Rosumeck ◽  
Lea Timmermann ◽  
Fritz Klein ◽  
Marcus Bahra ◽  
Sebastian Stintzig ◽  
...  

Background and Objectives: An increasing number of patients (pts) with locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) are treated with an intensive neoadjuvant therapy to obtain a secondary curative resection. Only a certain number of patients benefit from this intention. The aim of this investigation was to identify prognostic factors which may predict a benefit for secondary resection. Materials and Methods: Survival time and clinicopathological data of pts with pancreatic cancer were prospective and consecutively collected in our Comprehensive Cancer Center Database. For this investigation, we screened for pts with primarily unresectable pancreatic cancer who underwent a secondary resection after receiving induction therapy in the time between March 2017 and May 2019. Results: 40 pts had a sufficient database to carry out a reliable analysis. The carbohydrate-antigen 19-9 (CA 19-9) level of the pts treated with induction therapy decreased by 44.7% from 4358.3 U/mL to 138.5 U/mL (p = 0.001). The local cancer extension was significantly reduced (p < 0.001), and the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status was lowered (p = 0.03). The median overall survival (mOS) was 20 months (95% CI: 17.2–22.9). Pts who showed a normal CA 19-9 level (<37 U/mL) at diagnosis and after neoadjuvant therapy or had a Body Mass Index (BMI) below 25 kg/m2 after chemotherapy had a significant prolonged overall survival (29 vs. 19 months, p = 0.02; 26 vs. 18 months, p = 0.04; 15 vs. 24 months, p = 0.01). Pts who still presented elevated CA 19-9 levels >400 U/mL after induction therapy did not profit from a secondary resection (24 vs. 7 months, p < 0.001). Nodal negativity as well as the performance of an adjuvant therapy lead to better mOS (25 vs. 15 months, p = 0.003; 10 vs. 25 months, p < 0.001). Conclusion: The pts in our investigation had different benefits from the multimodal treatment. We identified the CA 19-9 level at time of diagnosis and after neoadjuvant therapy as well as the preoperative BMI as predictive factors for overall survival. Furthermore, diagnostics of presurgical nodal status should gain more importance as nodal negativity is associated with better outcome.


2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 434-434
Author(s):  
Eva Chao ◽  
Kyaw Lwin Aung ◽  
Qi Xu ◽  
William H. Matsui ◽  
Jeanne Kowalski

434 Background: There is no known molecular taxonomy of pancreatic cancer that can guide therapeutic strategies. Understanding the fundamental molecular mechanism underlying pancreatic cancer biology remains an unmet need. We explore the extent to which combinations of DNA-based molecular changes in copy number (CN) and methylation separate early stage PAAD tumors and associated with survival outcomes. Methods: We performed genome-wide combined cluster analyses on DNA-based CN and methylation changes using TCGA data. We examined cluster associations with clinical outcomes by comparing in months (mos), Kaplan--Meier estimated overall survival (OS) and disease-free interval (DFI) using a log-rank test. We performed additional comparisons among CN-Methylation derived clusters with respect to PAAD phenotypes. Results: Using 78 early stage pancreatic cancer tumors from TCGA with CN, methylation and clinical outcomes data, we identified two patient clusters with distinct gene copy number signatures that when combined with three methylation signatures, resulted in three additional clusters. Thus, the same gene CN signature, when combined with different methylation signatures, further differentiated tumors into sub-clusters with varying levels of associations with clinical outcome. Among them, analogous to current gene-expression based subtypes, we also identified an immune-rich subtype that was associated with improved overall survival (n=21, median OS=16mos; DFI=16mos), and an extracellular matrix (ECM)-rich with worse survival (n=19, median OS=12mos; DFI=8mos). Unlike previous expression subtypes, we identified another metabolic-enriched subtype with the same worse median OS and DFI, differentiated by methylation with the ECM-rich subtype. The improved OS cluster had a signature of CN neutral and increased methylation, while the poor cluster had a signature of CN gains and increased methylation among a set of genes distinct from the improved cluster. No significant differences in age, site, microsatellite instability and KRAS status among clusters were noted. Notably, in a multivariable model that included gene expression-based subtypes, only our DNA-level subtypes remained significantly associated with overall survival. Conclusions: While RNA-level changes often display large variations, DNA-level changes are more robust. Copy number changes appear to separate tumors into poor and improved prognosis clusters, while methylation appears to inform on the further separation of poor prognosis into various levels. A DNA-based molecular taxonomy for early stage pancreatic cancer could prove invaluable when used in combination with methylation-based circulating tumor DNA assays for clinical trial monitoring of tumor responses.


2019 ◽  
Vol 156 (6) ◽  
pp. S-1490-S-1491
Author(s):  
William Lancaster ◽  
David Adams ◽  
Katherine A. Morgan

HPB ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 21 ◽  
pp. S124
Author(s):  
O. Moaven ◽  
C.J. Clark ◽  
G.B. Russell ◽  
R. Howerton ◽  
K.I. Votanopoulos ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (5) ◽  
pp. 515-522 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ali A. Mokdad ◽  
Rebecca M. Minter ◽  
Hong Zhu ◽  
Mathew M. Augustine ◽  
Matthew R. Porembka ◽  
...  

Purpose To compare overall survival between patients who received neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) followed by resection and those who received upfront resection (UR)—as well as a subgroup of UR patients who also received adjuvant therapy—for early-stage resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Patients and Methods Adult patients with resected, clinical stage I or II adenocarcinoma of the head of the pancreas were identified in the National Cancer Database from 2006 to 2012. Patients who underwent NAT followed by curative-intent resection were matched by propensity score with patients whose tumors were resected upfront. Overall survival was compared by using a Cox proportional hazards regression model. Early postoperative and oncologic outcomes were evaluated. Results We identified 15,237 patients with clinical stage I or II resected pancreatic head adenocarcinoma. From the NAT group, 2,005 patients (95%) were matched with 6,015 patients who underwent UR. The NAT group was associated with improved survival compared with UR (median survival, 26 months v 21 months, respectively; stratified log-rank P < .01; hazard ratio, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.68 to 0.78). Patients in the UR group had higher pathologic T stage (pT3 and T4: 86% v 73%; P < .01), higher positive lymph nodes (73% v 48%; P < .01), and higher positive resection margin (24% v 17%; P < .01). Compared with a subset of UR patients who received adjuvant therapy, NAT patients had a better survival (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.73 to 0.89). Conclusion NAT followed by resection has a significant survival benefit compared with UR in early-stage, resected pancreatic head adenocarcinoma. These findings support the use of NAT, particularly as a patient selection tool, in the management of resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma.


2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15052-e15052
Author(s):  
Bradley D. McDowell ◽  
Brian J. Smith ◽  
Anna M Button ◽  
James R. Howe ◽  
Elizabeth A. Chrischilles ◽  
...  

e15052 Background: Pancreatic resection is the only known curative option for pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Resection has been previously reported to be underutilized in patients with early stage disease. To develop a better understanding of this issue and control for treatment selection factors, we examined the relationship between geographic area resection rates and survival in patients with stage I/II pancreatic cancer. Methods: We queried Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) data for patients with stage I/II cancer of the pancreatic head diagnosed from 2004-2009. We excluded patients with less than 3mo survival. Resection rates were calculated within Health Service Areas (HSAs) across all 18 SEER regions. Resection rate was defined as the number of patients who had an operation divided by the total number diagnosed with early stage pancreatic cancer. Multivariate Cox regression was used to estimate the overall survival effect of HSA rates while controlling for age, gender, marital status, poverty level, education, and AJCC stage. Results: 8,323 patients with stage I (n=1,454) and stage II (n=6,869) disease were analyzed. Pancreatectomy was performed in 476 patients (32.7%) with stage I disease and 3,846 (56.0%) with stage II disease. HSA resection rates were arranged into five groups (quintiles) which ranged from 42.7 to 65.7% (Table). Across the quintiles, median overall survival increased from 11 to 14 months, suggesting a positive association with resection rate. Multivariate analysis revealed that for every 10.00% increase in resection rate, the risk of overall death decreased by 5.26% (p<0.001). Conclusions: Patients with early stage pancreatic cancer who live in areas with higher resection rates have longer average survival times. Because geography should not influence treatment response, we conclude that efforts to raise resection rates should increase survival times in patients for whom there is uncertainty about the risk/benefits of resection. [Table: see text]


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document