The influence of anisotropy on the apparent resistivity tensor: A model study

2016 ◽  
Vol 135 ◽  
pp. 270-280
Author(s):  
Annika Rödder ◽  
Andreas Junge
2018 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 61-75
Author(s):  
Wenxin Kong ◽  
Changhong Lin ◽  
Handong Tan ◽  
Miao Peng ◽  
Tuo Tong ◽  
...  

Using the staggered-grid finite difference method, a numerical modeling algorithm for a 3D arbitrary anisotropic Earth is implemented based on magnetotelluric (MT) theory. After the validation of this algorithm and comparison with predecessors, it was applied to several qualitative and quantitative analyses containing electrical anisotropy and a simple 3D prism model. It was found that anisotropic parameters for ρ 1 , ρ 2 , and ρ 3 play almost the same role in affecting 3D MT responses as in 1D and 2D without considering three Euler's angles α S , α D , and α L . Significant differences appear between the off-diagonal components of the apparent resistivity tensor and also between the diagonal components in their values and distributing features under the influence of 3D anisotropy, which in turn help to identify whether the MT data are generated from 3D anisotropic earth. Considering the deflecting effects arising from the inconsistency between the anisotropy axes and the measuring axes, some strategies are also provided to estimate the deflecting angles associated with anisotropy strike α S or dip α D , which may be used as initial values for the 3D anisotropy inversion. [Figure: see text]


Geophysics ◽  
1986 ◽  
Vol 51 (4) ◽  
pp. 972-983 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. M. Bibby

Measurements of apparent resistivity made using the bipole‐dipole method depend upon the location and orientation of the current source relative to the body under study. Although it has been recognized that this dependence on orientation can be partially overcome by use of two current bipoles with different orientations, no agreement on the method of analysis of multiple source surveys has been reached. The most general form of presentation of such results is an apparent resistivity tensor. Various rotation invariants derived from the apparent resistivity tensor can be regarded as mean values of apparent resistivity, independent of the direction of the electric field, thus greatly reducing the “false anomalies” typical of single‐source bipole‐dipole survey results. Two of the tensor invariants obey the principle of reciprocity: if the roles of the current and potential electrodes are interchanged, the invariants are unchanged. The properties of the apparent resistivity tensor are demonstrated for selected simple models. For a horizontally layered medium, when the receiver array is far from the current source, the tensor is symmetric and has invariants which depend only on the distance from the current source. The extreme values of apparent resistivity occur when the electric field vector is tangential and radial relative to the current source. These extreme values correspond to the Schlumberger apparent resistivity and the “polar” dipole apparent resistivity, respectively. Lateral discontinuities in resistivity are modeled with both a single vertical discontinuity and a hemispherical model. The source‐dependent variations in the apparent resistivity derived from a single‐current bipole are greatly reduced in plots of the tensor invariants. For a vertical discontinuity, the tensor trace (the sum of the diagonal elements) is close to the resistivity underlying the receiver site, whereas for a hemisphere, the square root of the tensor determinant gives the best representation. Near lateral discontinuities in resistivity, the apparent resistivity tensor indicates strong dependence of apparent resistivity on the direction of the measured electric field. This apparent anisotropy can be used as an indicator of such discontinuities, yielding both position and orientation of the discontinuity.


2003 ◽  
Vol 155 (2) ◽  
pp. 456-468 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ute Weckmann ◽  
Oliver Ritter ◽  
Volker Haak

Geophysics ◽  
1977 ◽  
Vol 42 (6) ◽  
pp. 1258-1261 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. M. Bibby

The scalar apparent resistivity was originally defined for simple linear electrode resistivity arrays such as Wenner and Schlumberger arrays. With the extension of resistivity surveying into bipole‐dipole arrays, several different and not obviously related definitions of apparent resistivity have been used by different authors despite similar field procedure. In this note we show that when a pair of current sources (or quadripole source) is used, and the corresponding electric field vectors are measured at each field station, the most comprehensive expression of the reduced data is as an apparent resistivity tensor. Other definitions of apparent resistivity can be simply related to this tensor. For example, the quadripole‐quadripole apparent resistivity of Doicin (1976) is one of the tensor invariants; the maximum and minimum resistivities defined by the rotating dipole method of Furgerson and Keller (1975) can be simply derived, and their geometric mean is shown to be the quadripole‐quadripole value.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Viktor Nawa ◽  
Andreas Junge

<p><span>The quadrupole technique for geoelectrics yields the apparent resistivity in a tensorial form in contrast to the scalar apparent resistivity obtained from classical geoelectrics. The quadrupole method in geoelectrics has been applied in the past only for long offsets between transmitter and receiver. We scaled down the method to profile-style and grid-style short offset applications. Analysis of the invariants of the apparent resistivity tensor and its representation as ellipse can be used to obtain an estimate of the dimensionality of the subsurface conductivity distribution. We present the basic theory of the quadrupole ERT technique along with numerical and field examples highlighting the advantages over classic geoelectrical survey methods.<br></span></p>


2014 ◽  
Vol 35 (3) ◽  
pp. 144-157 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin Bäckström ◽  
Fredrik Björklund

The difference between evaluatively loaded and evaluatively neutralized five-factor inventory items was used to create new variables, one for each factor in the five-factor model. Study 1 showed that these variables can be represented in terms of a general evaluative factor which is related to social desirability measures and indicated that the factor may equally well be represented as separate from the Big Five as superordinate to them. Study 2 revealed an evaluative factor in self-ratings and peer ratings of the Big Five, but the evaluative factor in self-reports did not correlate with such a factor in ratings by peers. In Study 3 the evaluative factor contributed above the Big Five in predicting work performance, indicating a substance component. The results are discussed in relation to measurement issues and self-serving biases.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document