scholarly journals The role of intraoperative cell salvage for musculoskeletal sarcoma surgery

2021 ◽  
Vol 30 ◽  
pp. 100390
Author(s):  
Raja Bhaskara Rajasekaran ◽  
Antony J.R. Palmer ◽  
Duncan Whitwell ◽  
Thomas D.A. Cosker ◽  
David Pigott ◽  
...  
2014 ◽  
Vol 211 (4) ◽  
pp. 440-441
Author(s):  
Zachary J. Nash ◽  
Kumar Kunde ◽  
Lawrence J. Mascarenhas

2017 ◽  
Vol 28 (5) ◽  
pp. 991-997 ◽  
Author(s):  
Altuğ Duramaz ◽  
Mustafa Gökhan Bilgili ◽  
Berhan Bayram ◽  
Nezih Ziroğlu ◽  
Erdem Edipoğlu ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 5 (1_suppl) ◽  
pp. s-0035-1554216-s-0035-1554216
Author(s):  
Naresh Kumar ◽  
Aye Sandar Zaw

2005 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 234-239 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simon Dixon ◽  
Virge James ◽  
Daniel Hind ◽  
Craig J. Currie

Objectives:This study aims to provide the first estimates of the costs and effects of the large scale introduction of autologous transfusion technologies into the United Kingdom National Health Service.Methods:A model was constructed to allow disparate data sources to be combined to produce estimates of the scale, costs, and effects of introducing four interventions. The interventions considered were preparing patients for surgery (PPS) clinics, preoperative autologous donation (PAD), intraoperative cell salvage (ICS), and postoperative cell salvage (PoCS).Results:The key determinants of cost per operation are the anticipated level of reductions in blood use, the mean level of blood use, mean length of stay, and the cost of the technology. The results show the potential for considerable reductions in blood use. The greatest reductions are anticipated to be through the use of PPS and ICS. Vascular surgery, transplant surgery, and cardiothoracic surgery appear to be the specialties that will benefit most from the technologies.Conclusions:Several simplifications were used in the production of these estimates; consequently, caution should be used in their interpretation and use. Despite the drawbacks in the methods used in the study, the model shows the scale of the issue, the importance of gathering better data, and the form that data must take. Such preliminary modeling exercises are essential for rational policy development and to direct future research and discussion among stakeholders.


2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (11) ◽  
pp. 336-339
Author(s):  
Lucy Godfrey

The use of transfused blood, be it from an allogenic (donor) or autologous (same patient) source, is not a new treatment and in fact has been experimented with since the mid 1800s. The role of cell salvage and re-infusion of a patient’s own blood, however, has only begun to gain real popularity in the last 20 years, after the undertaking of several large scale meta-analyses which have shown that not only is autologous transfusion no less efficacious when compared to allogenic transfusion, but also potentially safer for a number of reasons. Autologous transfusion is also more cost effective overall and potentially quicker to initiate in an emergency situation. Despite the body of evidence to support the use of salvaged blood for transfusion, hesitation around its use still persists, with staff apprehension around set up of cell salvage equipment and general underestimation of intraoperative blood loss being key factors in its underuse.


2011 ◽  
Vol 30 (3) ◽  
pp. 379-383 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael A. Gorin ◽  
Ahmed Eldefrawy ◽  
Murugesan Manoharan ◽  
Mark S. Soloway

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document