Environmental assessment of small-scale dairy farms with multifunctionality in mountain areas

2016 ◽  
Vol 124 ◽  
pp. 94-102 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sara Salvador ◽  
Mirco Corazzin ◽  
Edi Piasentier ◽  
Stefano Bovolenta
2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chiara Spigarelli ◽  
Marco Berton ◽  
Mirco Corazzin ◽  
Luigi Gallo ◽  
Sabine Pinterits ◽  
...  

The multidimensional concept of animal welfare includes physical health, good emotional state, and appropriate behavior of the animals. The most recent methods for its assessment are inspired by the Welfare Quality, a project compiling animal-, resource-, and management-based measures. Recently, animal welfare assessment has also considered the human factor in a so-called “One Welfare” approach. The One Welfare framework highlights the interconnections between animal welfare, human well-being, and the environment. The concept seems to fit particularly well to mountain areas where the relationship between human, animals, and the environment is stronger. In such disadvantaged areas, farmers' well-being plays a key role in maintaining livestock farming profitably and sustainably. This study aims to investigate the relationship between farmers' satisfaction, animal welfare outcomes, and overall farm performance in 69 small-scale dairy farms in the Eastern Alps. Animal welfare assessment consisted of animal-based measures and was performed using the methodology proposed by the European Food Safety Authority for this type of farm. Moreover, the farmers were interviewed to retrieve data on farm characteristics and on their level of satisfaction toward workload, land organization, relationship with the agricultural/non-agricultural community, and the future of local agriculture. The results show that good animal welfare can be obtained in a mountain farming system. Clinical indicators show a low prevalence of diseases and of very lean cows as opposed to integument alterations. The workload is not perceived as a problem in traditional farms (i.e., tie-stall and with no participation in quality-certification schemes). Animal welfare is higher in those farms where farmers have a positive engagement with both the agricultural and non-agricultural community and where farmers are satisfied with their land organization. A One Welfare approach could be applied on a larger scale to fully understand the links between animal and human well-being in mountain areas.


2011 ◽  
Vol 49 (5) ◽  
pp. 693-702 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jesús Andrei Rosales-Castillo ◽  
Ma. Soledad Vázquez-Garcidueñas ◽  
Hugo Álvarez-Hernández ◽  
Omar Chassin-Noria ◽  
Alba Irene Varela-Murillo ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 47 (2) ◽  
pp. 331-337 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carlos Galdino Martínez-García ◽  
Adolfo Armando Rayas-Amor ◽  
Juan Pablo Anaya-Ortega ◽  
Francisco Ernesto Martínez-Castañeda ◽  
Angélica Espinoza-Ortega ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 103 (2) ◽  
pp. 1820-1830
Author(s):  
Regina Wald ◽  
Martina Baumgartner ◽  
Julia Gutschireiter ◽  
Benjamin Bazzanella ◽  
Katharina Lichtmannsperger ◽  
...  

Animals ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (10) ◽  
pp. 800
Author(s):  
Luis Javier Montiel-Olguín ◽  
Felipe J. Ruiz-López ◽  
Miguel Mellado ◽  
Eliab Estrada-Cortés ◽  
Sergio Gómez-Rosales ◽  
...  

Management and production characteristics impact conception rate to first service (CR1S) in small-scale dairy farms, but the impact of body condition score (BCS) and milk production levels on cows’ fertility is unknown. Our objective is to determine the effect of BCS and milk production on CR1S in small-scale dairy farms of western Mexico. Logistic regression models are used to determine the effect of BCS (at calving and first service), 60-d and 305-d milk production, protein and fat production, lactation number, and days at first service on CR1S. BCS at calving does not affect CR1S in cows with three or more lactations (39.5%; p > 0.1). However, first-lactation cows with BCS < 3.0 at calving and second lactation cows with BCS ≤ 2.5 at calving have higher CR1S (63.2 and 67.9%, respectively; p < 0.1). This result is perhaps due to reduced milk production, which leads to lower metabolic stress. BCS ≤ 2.5 at calving is associated (p < 0.05) with a reduced milk yield, explaining partially the observed higher CR1S in these groups. Cows with BCS ≤ 2.5 at first service in the higher quartile of 60-d milk production (≥ 28kg/day) show lower CR1S (23.9 and 51.1%, respectively; p < 0.01). In conclusion, BCS at calving and at first service, 60-d milk production, and lactation number are factors associated with CR1S.


2019 ◽  
Vol 52 (3) ◽  
pp. 1141-1148 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leonel Avendaño-Reyes ◽  
Peter H. Robinson ◽  
Juan A. Hernández-Rivera ◽  
Abelardo Correa-Calderón ◽  
Ángel López-López ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 73 (01) ◽  
pp. 73-76
Author(s):  
Mariana Valle-Aguilar ◽  
Felipe Lopez-Gonzalez ◽  
Aurora Sainz-Ramirez ◽  
Carlos Manuel Arriaga-Jordan

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document