scholarly journals Prognostic Value of Myocardial Extracellular Volume Fraction and T2-mapping in Heart Transplant Patients

2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (7) ◽  
pp. 1521-1530 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kongkiat Chaikriangkrai ◽  
Muhannad Aboud Abbasi ◽  
Roberto Sarnari ◽  
Ryan Dolan ◽  
Daniel Lee ◽  
...  
Radiology ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 288 (3) ◽  
pp. 748-754 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julian A. Luetkens ◽  
Sabine Klein ◽  
Frank Träber ◽  
Frederic C. Schmeel ◽  
Alois M. Sprinkart ◽  
...  

Diagnostics ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (5) ◽  
pp. 335
Author(s):  
George Markousis-Mavrogenis ◽  
Loukia Koutsogeorgopoulou ◽  
Gikas Katsifis ◽  
Theodoros Dimitroulas ◽  
Genovefa Kolovou ◽  
...  

Aims: T1-mapping is considered a surrogate marker of acute myocardial inflammation. However, in diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis (dcSSc) this might be confounded by coexisting myocardial fibrosis. We hypothesized that T1-based indices should not by themselves be considered as indicators of myocardial inflammation in dcSSc patients. Methods/Results: A cohort of 59 dcSSc and 34 infectious myocarditis patients was prospectively evaluated using a 1.5-Tesla system for an indication of suspected myocardial inflammation and was compared with 31 healthy controls. Collectively, 33 (97%) and 57 (98%) of myocarditis and dcSSc patients respectively had ≥1 pathologic T2-based index. However, 33 (97%) and 45 (76%) of myocarditis and dcSSc patients respectively had ≥1 pathologic T2-based index. T2-signal ratio was significantly higher in myocarditis patients compared with dcSSc patients (2.5 (0.6) vs. 2.1 (0.4), p < 0.001). Early gadolinium enhancement, late gadolinium enhancement and T2-mapping did not differ significantly between groups. However, both native T1-mapping and extracellular volume fraction were significantly lower in myocarditis compared with dcSSc patients (1051.0 (1027.0, 1099.0) vs. 1120.0 (1065.0, 1170.0), p < 0.001 and 28.0 (26.0, 30.0) vs. 31.5 (30.0, 33.0), p < 0.001, respectively). The original Lake Louise criteria (LLc) were positive in 34 (100%) myocarditis and 40 (69%) dcSSc patients, while the updated LLc were positive in 32 (94%) and 44 (76%) patients, respectively. Both criteria had good agreement with greater but nonsignificant discordance in dcSSc patients. Conclusions: ~25% of dcSSc patients with suspected myocardial inflammation had no CMR evidence of acute inflammatory processes. T1-based indices should not be used by themselves as surrogates of acute myocardial inflammation in dcSSc patients.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document