Parametric, cyclic aging and characterization studies for CO2 capture from flue gas and catalytic conversion to synthetic natural gas using a dual functional material (DFM)

2018 ◽  
Vol 27 ◽  
pp. 390-397 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shuoxun Wang ◽  
Robert J. Farrauto ◽  
Sam Karp ◽  
Ji Ho Jeon ◽  
Erik T. Schrunk
2019 ◽  
Vol 479 ◽  
pp. 25-30 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura Proaño ◽  
Edisson Tello ◽  
Martha A. Arellano-Trevino ◽  
Shuoxun Wang ◽  
Robert J. Farrauto ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 144 ◽  
pp. 223-232 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vanessa M. Lebarbier ◽  
Robert A. Dagle ◽  
Libor Kovarik ◽  
Karl O. Albrecht ◽  
Xiaohong Li ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Maria Elena Diego ◽  
Jean-Michel Bellas ◽  
Mohamed Pourkashanian

Post-combustion CO2 capture from natural gas combined cycle (NGCC) power plants is challenging due to the large flow of flue gas with low CO2 content (∼3–4%vol.) that needs to be processed in the capture stage. A number of alternatives have been proposed to solve this issue and reduce the costs of the associated CO2 capture plant. This work focuses on the selective exhaust gas recirculation (S-EGR) configuration, which uses a membrane to selectively recirculate CO2 back to the inlet of the compressor of the turbine, thereby greatly increasing the CO2 content of the flue gas sent to the capture system. For this purpose, a parallel S-EGR NGCC system (53% S-EGR ratio) coupled to an amine capture plant using MEA 30%wt. was simulated using gCCS (gPROMS). It was benchmarked against an unabated NGCC system, a conventional NGCC coupled with an amine capture plant (NGCC+CCS), and an EGR NGCC power plant (39% EGR ratio) using amine scrubbing as the downstream capture technology. The results obtained indicate that the net power efficiency of the parallel S-EGR system can be up to 49.3% depending on the specific consumption of the auxiliary S-EGR systems, compared to the 49.0% and 49.8% values obtained for the NGCC+CCS and EGR systems, respectively. A preliminary economic study was also carried out to quantify the potential of the parallel S-EGR configuration. This high-level analysis shows that the cost of electricity for the parallel S-EGR system varies from 82.1–90.0 $/MWhe for the scenarios considered, with the cost of CO2 avoided being in the range of 79.7–105.1 $/tonne CO2. The results obtained indicate that there are potential advantages of the parallel S-EGR system in comparison to the NGCC+CCS configuration in some scenarios. However, further benefits with respect to the EGR configuration will depend on future advancements and cost reductions achieved on membrane-based systems.


2007 ◽  
Vol 9 (6) ◽  
pp. 616 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fr?d?ric Vogel ◽  
Maurice H. Waldner ◽  
Ashaki A. Rouff ◽  
Stefan Rabe

Energies ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (10) ◽  
pp. 2519 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emmanuel Adu ◽  
Y.D. Zhang ◽  
Dehua Liu ◽  
Paitoon Tontiwachwuthikul

For the envisaged large number of commercial-scale carbon capture and storage (CCS) projects that are to be implemented in the near future, a number of issues still need to be resolved, the most prominent being the large capital and operational costs incurred for the CO2 capture and compression process. An economic assessment of the capture and compression system based on optimal design data is important for CCS deployment. In this paper, the parametric process design approach is used to optimally design coal and natural gas monoethanolamine (MEA)-based post-combustion CO2 absorption–desorption capture (PCC) and compression plants that can be integrated into large-scale 550 MW coal-fired and 555 MW natural gas combined cycle (NGCC) power plants, respectively, for capturing CO2 from their flue gases. The study then comparatively assesses the energy performance and economic viabilities of both plants to ascertain their operational feasibilities and relative costs. The parametric processes are presented and discussed. The results indicate that, at 90% CO2 capture efficiency, for the coal PCC plant, with 13.5 mol.% CO2 in the inlet flue gas, at an optimum liquid/gas ratio of 2.87 kg/kg and CO2 lean loading of 0.2082 mol CO2/mol MEA, the CO2 avoidance cost is about $72/tCO2, and, for the NGCC PCC plant, with 4.04 mol.% CO2 in the inlet flue gas, at an optimum liquid/gas ratio of 0.98 kg/kg and CO2 lean loading of 0.2307 mol CO2/mol MEA, the CO2 avoidance cost is about $94/tCO2.


2016 ◽  
Vol 170 ◽  
pp. 68-77 ◽  
Author(s):  
Swapan K. Das ◽  
Xinbo Wang ◽  
Mayur M. Ostwal ◽  
Zhiping Lai
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document