scholarly journals Factors affecting the in vitro performance of dentin-bonding systems

2012 ◽  
Vol 48 (1) ◽  
pp. 53-60 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masashi Miyazaki ◽  
Keishi Tsubota ◽  
Toshiki Takamizawa ◽  
Hiroyasu Kurokawa ◽  
Akitomo Rikuta ◽  
...  
1994 ◽  
Vol 73 (1) ◽  
pp. 44-55 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Perdigao ◽  
E.J. Swift ◽  
G.E. Denehy ◽  
J.S. Wefel ◽  
K.J. Donly

2015 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 58
Author(s):  
Karin Cristina Modena ◽  
Vanessa Pavoni Cannabrava ◽  
Jaine Zanolla ◽  
Carlos Ferreira Santos ◽  
Maria Fidela Lima Navarro ◽  
...  

<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this <em>in vitro</em> study was to compare dentin bonding systems and composite resins based on their functional groups in terms of water sorption (WS) and water solubility (WSB). <strong>Material and Methods: </strong>Three dentin bonding systems (Adper Single Bond 2 – 3M ESPE, Clearfil SE Bond – Kuraray, P90 Adhesive System – 3M ESPE) and three commercial composite resins (Filtek Z350 – 3M ESPE, Filtek Z250 – 3M ESPE, Filtek P90 – 3M ESPE) were tested. Eight specimens of each material were prepared to evaluate the WS and WSA. The discs were individually stored in a desiccator until constant mass was achieved. Specimens were then individually stored in distilled water until the mass was stabilized again. Finally, the specimens were dried again in the desiccator until constant mass was obtained. WS and WSA were calculated from these measurements. Data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA and Tukey post hoc test (p &lt; 0.05). <strong>Results:</strong> Filtek Silorane-Bond presented the lowest values of WS, and Clearfil SE Bond presented the lowest WSB. Filtek Silorane resin showed the lowest WS and WSA results. <strong>Conclusion:</strong> Based on the results, it can be concluded that the WS and WSB were influenced by the composition of the materials. The main functional group of the materials determines their susceptibility to water and influences their performance. </p>


2015 ◽  
Vol 58 (2) ◽  
pp. 43-48 ◽  
Author(s):  
Waleed Bakhadher ◽  
Hassan Halawany ◽  
Nabeel Talic ◽  
Nimmi Abraham ◽  
Vimal Jacob

The adhesive material used to bond orthodontic brackets to teeth should neither fail during the treatment period, resulting in treatment delays, untoward expenses or patient inconvenience nor should it damage the enamel on debonding at the end of the treatment. Although the effectiveness of a bonding system and any unfavorable effects on the enamel may be studied by conductingin-vivostudies, it is nearly impossible to independently analyze different variables that influence a specific bonding system in the oral environment.In-vitrostudies, on the other hand, may utilize more standardized protocols for testing different bonding systems and materials available. Thus, the present review focused attention onin-vitrostudies and made an attempt to discuss material-related, teeth-related (fluorotic vs non-fluorotic teeth) and other miscellaneous factors that influences the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets. Within the limitations of this review, using conventional acid-etch technique, ceramic brackets and bonding to non-fluorotic teeth was reported to have a positive influence on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets, but higher shear bond strength found on using ceramic brackets can be dangerous for the enamel.


2017 ◽  
Vol 75 ◽  
pp. 23-30 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eugenio Brambilla ◽  
Andrei C. Ionescu ◽  
Gloria Cazzaniga ◽  
Marco Ottobelli ◽  
Annalisa Mazzoni ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document