scholarly journals Sex differences in the non-invasive risk stratification and prognosis after myocardial infarction

2014 ◽  
Vol 47 (6) ◽  
pp. 874-880 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Sinnecker ◽  
Katharina M. Huster ◽  
Alexander Müller ◽  
Michael Dommasch ◽  
Alexander Hapfelmeier ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (35) ◽  
pp. 2940-2949 ◽  
Author(s):  
Konstantinos A Gatzoulis ◽  
Dimitrios Tsiachris ◽  
Petros Arsenos ◽  
Christos-Konstantinos Antoniou ◽  
Polychronis Dilaveris ◽  
...  

Abstract Aims Sudden cardiac death (SCD) annual incidence is 0.6–1% in post-myocardial infarction (MI) patients with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF)≥40%. No recommendations for implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) use exist in this population. Methods and results We introduced a combined non-invasive/invasive risk stratification approach in post-MI ischaemia-free patients, with LVEF ≥ 40%, in a multicentre, prospective, observational cohort study. Patients with at least one positive electrocardiographic non-invasive risk factor (NIRF): premature ventricular complexes, non-sustained ventricular tachycardia, late potentials, prolonged QTc, increased T-wave alternans, reduced heart rate variability, abnormal deceleration capacity with abnormal turbulence, were referred for programmed ventricular stimulation (PVS), with ICDs offered to those inducible. The primary endpoint was the occurrence of a major arrhythmic event (MAE), namely sustained ventricular tachycardia/fibrillation, appropriate ICD activation or SCD. We screened and included 575 consecutive patients (mean age 57 years, LVEF 50.8%). Of them, 204 (35.5%) had at least one positive NIRF. Forty-one of 152 patients undergoing PVS (27–7.1% of total sample) were inducible. Thirty-seven (90.2%) of them received an ICD. Mean follow-up was 32 months and no SCDs were observed, while 9 ICDs (1.57% of total screened population) were appropriately activated. None patient without NIRFs or with NIRFs but negative PVS met the primary endpoint. The algorithm yielded the following: sensitivity 100%, specificity 93.8%, positive predictive value 22%, and negative predictive value 100%. Conclusion The two-step approach of the PRESERVE EF study detects a subpopulation of post-MI patients with preserved LVEF at risk for MAEs that can be effectively addressed with an ICD. Clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT02124018


2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nikita Patil ◽  
Ryan Max ◽  
Arman Qamar ◽  
John P Vavalle ◽  
Sameer Arora

Objectives: Sex differences are known to exist in the management ofolder patients presenting with myocardial infarction (MI). Whether inpatient MI management, outcomes and readmissions differ by sex in young adults is not known. Methods: Nationwide Readmissions Database (NRD) was queried for hospitalizations with MI in adults between 18 and 50 years of age from October 2015 and November 2016 using ICD-10 CM codes. Hospitalizations with discharges in December were excluded as 30-day follow-up for these could not be completed in NRD. Logistic regression analysis was used to estimate the association between gender and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), coronary artery bypass graft (CABG), coronary angiography, non-invasive testing, death and 30-day readmissions. ST-elevation MI (STEMI) subset was similarly analyzed. Results: Of 33,981 hospitalizations, 29% were females. Mean age was 43 years. STEMI constituted 13,177 hospitalizations with 22% females. As compared with men, women were more likely to have peripheral vascular disease (6% vs 4%), chronic pulmonary disease (17% vs 10%), diabetes mellitus (36% vs 28%); and less likely to have a prior history of MI (10% vs 12%). Women were less likely to undergo noninvasive testing (10% vs 11 %, p=0.002) and were revascularized less often than men with PCI (45% vs 56%, p<0.0001) and CABG (6% vs 7%, p<0.0001). Women underwent PCI less often in STEMI as well (72% vs. 76%, p<0.0001). Inpatient mortality and 30-day readmissions were higher in women overall (1.9% vs 1.6%, p=0.04) and (14% vs 9%, p<0.0001); as well as in STEMI: (4% vs 3%, p<0.0001) and (12% vs 8%, p<0.0001). In adjusted analysis (Figure 1: A, B), women were less likely to undergo non-invasive testing or revascularization in the overall cohort; and were less likely to undergo PCI in the STEMI cohort. Additionally, women had higher odds of 30-day readmissions overall, while the odds of inpatient mortality were higher only in STEMI subset. Conclusion: In a large MI cohort, young women were less likely to undergo ischemic workup and be revascularized, and had higher odds of 30-day readmissions. Women had higher odds of mortality in STEMI


1998 ◽  
Vol 43 (3) ◽  
pp. 72-73 ◽  
Author(s):  
I. R. Mahy ◽  
G. S. Hillis ◽  
K. P. Jennings

The objective was to determine how patients are selected for invasive investigation after myocardial infarction in Scotland Cardiologists in Scotland were surveyed by postal questionnaire asking them to detail their approach to four sample clinical scenarios. Complete responses were obtained from 82% of those surveyed Substantial differences in practice were observed in the management of subjects with non-Q wave myocardial infarction. Of the cardiologists surveyed 40% would undertake coronary angiography irrespective of the results of non-invasive testing in a 45 year old patient, but only one would adopt the same policy in an otherwise fit 77 year old Only 44% would perform any investigations (beyond echocardiography) in the 77 year old A minority of respondents felt that their practice was influenced by resource limitation. Considerable variation continues to exist in the approach to risk stratification after myocardial infarction for some groups of patients. This variation may occur principally as a consequence of physician preference.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document