ISO 14 001 at the farm level: Analysis of five methods for evaluating the environmental impact of agricultural practices

2007 ◽  
Vol 82 (3) ◽  
pp. 341-352 ◽  
Author(s):  
M.B. Galan ◽  
D. Peschard ◽  
H. Boizard
2006 ◽  
Vol 78 (4) ◽  
pp. 667-686 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luiz F.L. Reis ◽  
Marie-Anne Van Sluys ◽  
Richard C. Garratt ◽  
Humberto M. Pereira ◽  
Mauro M. Teixeira

Biosafety of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) and their derivatives is still a major topic in the agenda of government and societies worldwide. The aim of this review is to bring into light that data that supported the decision taken back in 1998 as an exercise to stimulate criticism from the scientific community for upcoming discussions and to avoid emotional and senseless arguments that could jeopardize future development in the field. It must be emphasized that Roundup Ready® soybean is just one example of how biotechnology can bring in significant advances for society, not only through increased productivity, but also with beneficial environmental impact, thereby allowing more rational use of agricultural pesticides for improvement of the soil conditions. The adoption of agricultural practices with higher yield will also allow better distribution of income among small farmers. New species of genetically modified plants will soon be available and society should be capable of making decisions in an objective and well-informed manner, through collegiate bodies that are qualified in all aspects of biosafety and environmental impact.


2003 ◽  
Vol 63 (2) ◽  
pp. 143-155 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ashok K. Mishra ◽  
Barry K. Goodwin

2007 ◽  
Vol 67 (2) ◽  
pp. 241-257 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carl J. Lagerkvist ◽  
Karin Larsen ◽  
Kent D. Olson

2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hua Wang ◽  
Naveen Adusumilli ◽  
Daniel Fromme ◽  
Keith Shannon

2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard F Nehring ◽  
Kenneth Erickson ◽  
James M Harris ◽  
Charlie Hallahan ◽  
Ani Katchova ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Rishikesh Singh ◽  
Pratap Srivastava ◽  
Pardeep Singh ◽  
Shweta Upadhyay ◽  
Akhilesh Singh Raghubanshi

World population is rapidly growing and expected to reach in between 8.5 to 12 billion by 2100. More than 75% of the population is expected to inhabit in the African and Asian countries having most of the developing nations. The overpopulation leads to a state of food insecurity that induced the evolution of resource-exhaustive agriculture causing irreparable environmental damages. Now the challenge is to feed more with less environmental damages. Adoption of technologically-sound, traditional knowledge inclusive, socio-economically sensible recommended agricultural practices can be the basis for achieving future dietary demands. However, before wider recommendation, their environmental impact assessment at various sustainability issues is necessitated for a holistic understanding of the future agriculture. The challenges of overpopulation and food security can only be managed by identifying the core areas of research and development under different agricultural sectors. The present chapter will provide a brief dimension on some of these key issues.


2022 ◽  
Vol 465 ◽  
pp. 109855
Author(s):  
Kangming Tan ◽  
Yuliang Li ◽  
Yun Chen ◽  
Fangdan Liu ◽  
Jingmin Ou ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Namy Espinoza-Orias ◽  
Antonis Vlassopoulos ◽  
Gabriel Masset

Abstract Background The global food system faces a dual challenge for the decades ahead: providing nutritious food to a growing population while reducing its environmental footprint. Reformulation of food has been identified as a strategy to improve the nutritional quality of products; but the environmental consequences of such reformulations have rarely been studied. The objective was to assess the evolution of five environmental impact indicators following reformulations of extruded breakfast cereals. Methods Recipe, nutritional composition and sourcing data for three extruded breakfast cereals were retrieved from the manufacturer, at three distinctive time points of a 15-year reformulation cycle: 2003, 2010, and 2018. Nutritional information was summarized using the Nutri-Score indicator. The environmental impact of all recipes was assessed by Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) using five indicators: climate change (CC), Freshwater consumption scarcity (FWCS), Abiotic resource depletion (ARD), Land use impacts on biodiversity (LUIB), and Impacts on ecosphere/ecosystems quality (IEEQ). Life cycle inventory (LCI) was both primary data from the manufacturer and secondary data from usual third-party LCI datasets. Results Reformulation led to improved nutritional quality for all three products. In terms of environmental impact, improvements were observed for the CC, ARD and IEEQ indicators, with average reductions of 12%, 14% and 2% between 2003 and 208, respectively. Conversely, the FWCS and LUIB indicators were increased by 57% and 70%, respectively. For all indicators but ARD, ingredients contributed most to the environmental impact, while the absolute impacts of other stages of the supply chain (i.e. manufacturing, packaging, transport and end-of-life) reduced. A sensitivity analysis simulating no deforestation agricultural practices suggested that the CC indicator could be further reduced by 21 to 49% for the 2018 recipes. Conclusions This study highlighted the need to better account for the environmental consequences of changing food product recipes. While improvements can be achieved at all stages of products’ life cycles, agricultural commodities need to be the focus for further improvement, in particular in shelf-stable grain-based products such as extruded cereals. This could be achieved through selection of less demanding ingredients and improvements in agricultural practices.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document