Estimating the risk of chemotherapy toxicity in older patients with cancer: The role of the Vulnerable Elders Survey-13 (VES-13)

2015 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 272-279 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea Luciani ◽  
Laura Biganzoli ◽  
Giuseppe Colloca ◽  
Cristina Falci ◽  
Bruno Castagneto ◽  
...  
Drugs & Aging ◽  
1994 ◽  
Vol 4 (5) ◽  
pp. 392-402 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wieslaw S. Lasota ◽  
Dominique L. de Valeriola ◽  
Martine J. Piccart

BMC Cancer ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Pierre Soubeyran ◽  
Catherine Terret ◽  
Carine Bellera ◽  
Franck Bonnetain ◽  
Olivier Saint Jean ◽  
...  

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (6) ◽  
pp. 1400
Author(s):  
Lieze Berben ◽  
Giuseppe Floris ◽  
Hans Wildiers ◽  
Sigrid Hatse

Age is one of the main risk factors of cancer; several biological changes linked with the aging process can explain this. As our population is progressively aging, the proportion of older patients with cancer is increasing significantly. Due to the heterogeneity of general health and functional status amongst older persons, treatment of cancer is a major challenge in this vulnerable population. Older patients often experience more side effects of anticancer treatments. Over-treatment should be avoided to ensure an optimal quality of life. On the other hand, under-treatment due to fear of toxicity is a frequent problem and can lead to an increased risk of relapse and worse survival. There is a delicate balance between benefits of therapy and risk of toxicity. Robust biomarkers that reflect the body’s biological age may aid in outlining optimal individual treatment regimens for older patients with cancer. In particular, the impact of age on systemic immunity and the tumor immune infiltrate should be considered, given the expanding role of immunotherapy in cancer treatment. In this review, we summarize current knowledge concerning the mechanistic connections between aging and cancer, as well as aging biomarkers that could be helpful in the field of geriatric oncology.


2020 ◽  
Vol 25 (10) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jaime Feliu ◽  
Beatriz Jiménez‐Munárriz ◽  
Laura Basterretxea ◽  
Irene Paredero ◽  
Elisenda Llabrés ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 3 ◽  
pp. S81 ◽  
Author(s):  
J.M. Stokoe⁎ ◽  
J. Pearce ◽  
R. Sinha ◽  
A. Ring

2018 ◽  
Vol 34 (4) ◽  
pp. 229-237 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francesca Chiesi ◽  
Andrea Bonacchi ◽  
Caterina Primi ◽  
Alessandro Toccafondi ◽  
Guido Miccinesi

Abstract. The present study aimed at evaluating if the three-item sense of coherence (SOC) scale developed by Lundberg and Nystrom Peck (1995) can be effectively used for research purpose in both nonclinical and clinical samples. To provide evidence that it represents adequately the measured construct we tested its validity in a nonclinical (N = 658) and clinical sample (N = 764 patients with cancer). Results obtained in the nonclinical sample attested a positive relation of SOC – as measured by the three-item SOC scale – with Antonovsky’s 13-item and 29-item SOC scales (convergent validity), and with dispositional optimism, sense of mastery, anxiety, and depression symptoms (concurrent validity). Results obtained in the clinical sample confirmed the criterion validity of the scale attesting the positive role of SOC – as measured by the three-item SOC scale – on the person’s capacity to respond to illness and treatment. The current study provides evidence that the three-item SOC scale is a valid, low-loading, and time-saving instrument for research purposes on large sample.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document