Comparison of code stroke response times between the emergency department and inpatient setting in a major metropolitan hospital

2021 ◽  
Vol 429 ◽  
pp. 118771
Author(s):  
Catarina De Marchi Assuncao ◽  
Henry Taques Grein ◽  
Beth Chauncey Evers ◽  
Kerri Remmel
Stroke ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 44 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Amy Castle ◽  
Lana Stein ◽  
Sandra Hanson ◽  
Charles Ormiston ◽  
Karen Porth

BACKGROUND: Reperfusion therapy is the most important recent advance in early treatment for acute ischemic stroke, but remains underused and the timing of administration of treatment continues to be unacceptably delayed. The complexity of the decision tree and risk of treatment may be limiting use in the emergency department (ED) when those directing the therapy have limited knowledge and less comfort with administration of the drug. This review supports the hypothesis that utilizing telestroke to increase the Stroke Neurology expertise early in the stroke code in an organized stroke code process in a metropolitan hospital ED will improve the rate of use of reperfusion therapy and decrease the door-to-drug (DTD) times. METHODS and RESULTS: Telestroke was used to allow for Stroke Neurology presence and leadership in a redesigned stroke code process at 2 busy metropolitan hospitals beginning in 2009 at St. Joseph’s Hospital and 2010 at St. John’s Hospital. CONCLUSION: Telemedicine run stroke codes in a busy metropolitan ED resulted in increased use of reperfusion therapy and dramatic decreases in DTD times.


CJEM ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 19 (06) ◽  
pp. 441-449 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adam Jonathan Kaufman ◽  
Janine McCready ◽  
Jeff Powis

AbstractBackgroundAntibiotic overuse has promoted growing rates of antimicrobial resistance and secondary antibiotic-associated infections such asClostridium difficile(C. difficile). Antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs) are effective in reducing antimicrobial use in the inpatient setting; however, the unique environment of the emergency department (ED) lends itself to challenges for successful implementation. Front-line ownership (FLO) methodology has been shown to be a potentially effective strategy for the implementation of inpatient ASPs through an iterative multi-pronged approach driven by front-line providers.ObjectiveTo determine whether a FLO approach to antimicrobial stewardship in the ED can alter antimicrobial usage.MethodsInterventions were driven by ED physicians and facilitated by Infectious Diseases Division physicians from the hospital’s ASP using FLO principles. Measured end points included antibiotic usage in the ED as measured by defined daily doses, and rates of urine culture sent from the ED.ResultsThere was a step-wise significant reduction in the use of azithromycin (p=0.006), ceftriaxone (p=0.045), ciprofloxacin (p=0.034), and moxifloxacin (p=0.008). There was also a significant reduction in rates of urine cultures (p<0.001) by 2.26 urine cultures per 100 ED patient visits.ConclusionsFLO offers a promising approach to successful implementation of an ASP in the ED. Future studies would be important to evaluate the generalizability of the FLO approach to ASP development in other EDs and to determine strategies to improve the sustainability of reductions in antimicrobial use.


2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (29_suppl) ◽  
pp. 140-140
Author(s):  
Andrea Cartin ◽  
Rosaura Benavides ◽  
Manuel Zeledon

140 Background: A “Palliative Medicine Day Care Unit” (PMDCU) program began in January of 2014 as part of the services provided by the Department of Palliative Medicine in a national hospital in Costa Rica; the program allows patients with hemato-oncological diseases to continue as outpatients while receiving inpatient treatment for their refractory symptoms. This study analyses patient consult rates, results and the dynamics of the unit during its first year in service. Methods: The statistical information of patients attended in the PMDCU, were collected during the period between January and December of 2014. The data included: the population characteristics, the nature of the care provided and the interaction with other departments. Results: A total of 1311 patients were examined in the PMDCU, for a total of 1609 consultations; on average each patient had 3.6 consultations. The average time patients spent with physicians during consultation or receiving treatment were 115 minutes. The most common patient diagnosis was gastrointestinal, gynecological, and prostate cancers. After the initial consult, 63% of patients continued treatment in the outpatient clinic of the same hospital, 34% were scheduled for follow-up consultations in the PMDCU, 2.4% of patients were referred to the Emergency Department and less than 2% of patients were either admitted to the hospital or were referred to other palliative care units. Treatment in the PMDCU included, analgesia treatment administration, paracentesis, thoracocentesis, parenteral nutrition, blood transfusions and patient and family education. Conclusions: The PMDCU has had acceptance among patients with a high number of consultations and adequate follow up of patients. The most common types of cancer diagnosis were gastrointestinal, gynecological and prostate cancers. The majority of patients examined, continued treatment in either the outpatient clinic or follow up in the PMDCU; few were referred to the emergency department. The PMDCU provides treatment that would normally be administered either in an inpatient setting or in the emergency department, but avoiding the extra cost and inconvenience to the patients and their family.


2007 ◽  
Vol 31 (3) ◽  
pp. 462 ◽  
Author(s):  
Scott Brunero ◽  
Greg Fairbrother ◽  
Soung Lee ◽  
Martin Davis

The objective of this study is to determine the clinical characteristics of people with mental health problems who frequently attend an Australian emergency department (ED). A retrospective clinical audit of presenter characteristics was conducted in a 550-bed tertiary referral metropolitan hospital with data reflecting 12 months of consecutive ED presentations between September 2002 and August 2003. A sample of 868 individuals accounted for 1076 presentations. Patients attending more than once accounted for 12.5% of the total sample. Significant variables associated with frequent attendance included: younger age; English speaking background; and mood and anxiety disorders. Lone arrival of a patient to the ED showed marginal significance. The significant associates of frequent attendance found in this study may be used to identify patients earlier to a multidisciplinary case review process and individual management planning involving clinicians, carers and patients.


2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S182-S182
Author(s):  
Salma M . Al Shaqfa ◽  
Rania M El Lababidi ◽  
Wasim S El Nekidy ◽  
Mohamed Hisham ◽  
Rama Nasef ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Implementation of antimicrobial stewardship (AS) interventions in the emergency department (ED) has been associated with improved patient outcomes. One potentially promising AS strategy is the implementation of an ED-specific, evidence-based antimicrobial order set. In this study, we aimed to examine the impact of implementing an ED-specific order set (EDOS) on the appropriateness of empiric antimicrobial therapy. Methods We conducted a pre-post quasi experimental study on 160 adult patients presenting to the ED with suspected or confirmed common infections at our quaternary healthcare facility. The EDOS was implemented in December 2020, providing evidence-based recommendations for the management of common infectious diseases. Data was collected between September 2019 and March 2020 for the pre-EDOS implementation group and between January 2021 and April 2021 for the post-EDOS implementation group. Pregnant women and patients with suspected or confirmed COVID-19 infection were excluded. Data were analyzed using two-sample T-test and mixed effects logistic regression. The primary study outcome was the appropriateness of antimicrobials selected, and the secondary outcomes were clinical and microbiologic cure, length of hospital stay, Clostridioides difficile infection, and the number of changes in antimicrobial therapy on transition to inpatient setting. Results A total of 100 ED patients pre-EDOS implementation and 60 patients post-EDOS implementation were compared. At baseline, patients in the post-EDOS group were older (59.83±20.30 years vs. 50.17±19.97 years, P=0.0037). A higher number of patients in the post-EDOS group had a history of multiple comorbidities (76.67% vs. 54%, P=0.0039). There was a higher rate of appropriate antimicrobial use in the post-EDOS group as compared to the pre-EDOS group (88.3% vs. 50%, P< 0.001). Longer hospital stays were observed in the post-EDOS group (P=0.0005). Clinical cure was similar between the two groups (96.6% vs. 94%, P=0.4568). Conclusion In our study, we observed higher rates of appropriate antimicrobial selection after implementation of an EDOS. Use of an EDOS may represent a valuable AS intervention to guide appropriate antimicrobial prescribing in the ED, and larger studies are needed to confirm those findings. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures


Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 2157-2157
Author(s):  
Steven Deitelzweig ◽  
Patrick Hlavacek ◽  
Jack Mardekian ◽  
Lisa Rosenblatt ◽  
Cristina Russ ◽  
...  

Background: With fixed-dose regimens, fast onset of action, and no requirement for routine monitoring, direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have facilitated the treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE) on an outpatient basis. Little is known regarding the outcomes of patients who recieve DOACs in the emergency department (ED). Thus, in this study we evaluated hospitalization LOS and costs of patients who were diagnosed with VTE in the ED and treated with apixaban or warfarin Methods: Adult patients (≥18 years of age) admitted into the ED with a primary discharge diagnosis code indicating VTE were identified from the Premier Hospital database (8/1/2014-5/31/2018). Patients who received apixaban or warfarin during the ED visit were identified and grouped into two study cohorts according to the oral anticoagulant received. Patients treated with warfarin were additionally required to have received ≥1 injectable anticoagulant during ED admissions. The first of such VTE ED admissions was defined as the index event, with the corresponding ED or hospital discharge date as the index date. Patient demographics and clinical and hospital characteristics were evaluated during the index event or a 12-month baseline period. The outcomes of ED discharge status, hospital LOS (ED visit alone has LOS = 0 day), cost of the index event, and rate of 1-month all-cause hospital readmission were compared for the two study cohorts. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were conducted to evaluate the impact of apixaban vs. warfarin treatment on the likelihood of being moved from the ED to the inpatient setting vs. discharged from the ED, as well as the likelihood of 1-month all-cause readmission. Generalized linear models were used to evaluate the impact of apixaban vs. warfarin treatment on index event hospital LOS and cost. Covariates in all analyses included age, gender, race, payer type, Charlson Comorbidity Index score group, baseline bleed status, baseline VTE status, index VTE type, and hospital characteristics. Results: Of the overall study population, 30.5% (n=12,174; mean age: 59.7 years) received apixaban and 69.5% (n=27,767; mean age: 59.3 years) received warfarin for VTE in the ED setting. Mean Charlson Comorbidity Index score was lower for apixaban vs. warfarin treated patients (1.0 vs. 1.3; p<0.001). A significantly lower proportion of patients treated with apixaban, compared with those treated with warfarin, were admitted to the inpatient setting (31.0% vs. 67.1%, p<0.001). Unadjusted mean hospital LOS was shorter (0.9 vs. 2.6 days per patient; p<0.001) and mean index event cost lower ($2,389 vs. $5,348 per patient; p<0.001) for apixaban vs. warfarin patients. The unadjusted rate of 1-month all-cause readmission was also lower for apixaban vs. warfarin patients (10.3% vs. 12.4%; p<0.001). After adjusting for patient and hospital characteristics, apixaban treatment was associated with a significantly lower likelihood of admission to the inpatient setting vs. warfarin (Odds Ratio [OR]: 0.124, 95% Confidence Interval [CI]: 0.115 to 0.133; p<0.001). Correspondingly, mean index hospital LOS was 1.42 days shorter (95% CI: -1.47 to -1.36; p<0.001) and mean index event cost per patient was significantly lower ($3,732 [95% CI: $3,565 to $3,907] vs. $8,008 [95% CI: $7,676 to $8,355]; difference: -$4,276; p<0.001). After taking into account patient and hospital characteristics, the likelihood of all-cause 1-month readmission was significantly lower for patients treated with apixaban vs. warfarin (OR: 0.853, 95% CI: 0.793 to 0.917; p<0.001). Conclusions: In the real-world setting, VTE patients admitted into the ED who are treated with apixaban had a lower likelihood than warfarin treated patients of being subsequently admitted into the inpatient setting, which was reflected in shorter average LOS and lower average index event cost. The risk of 1-month all-cause readmission was also lower for patients treated with apixaban vs. warfarin. Disclosures Deitelzweig: Pfizer: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy. Hlavacek:Pfizer Inc.: Employment. Mardekian:Pfizer Inc.: Employment. Rosenblatt:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Other: Stock Owner ; Bristol-Myers Squibb Company: Employment. Russ:Pfizer: Employment. Tuell:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Employment. Lingohr-Smith:Novosys Health: Employment. Lin:Pfizer: Consultancy; Novosys Health: Employment; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy. Guo:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Employment.


Iproceedings ◽  
10.2196/15091 ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. e15091
Author(s):  
Adam Beck ◽  
Caroline Robinson

Background Revisits within 30 days to an emergency department (ED), observation care unit, or inpatient setting following patient discharge continues to be a challenge, especially in urban settings. In addition to the consequences for the patient, these revisits have a negative impact on a health system’s finances in a value based care or global budget environment. Objective The objective was to evaluate the effectiveness of a customized automated digital patient engagement application (GetWell Loop) to prevent 30-day revisits after home discharge from an ED or hospital inpatient setting. Methods The LifeBridge Health Innovation Team collaborated with the GetWell Network to customize their patient engagement platform (GetWell Loop) with automated check-in questions and resources. An application link was emailed to adult patients discharged home from the ED. A retrospective study of ED visits for patients treated for general medicine and cardiology conditions (accounting for 24% of our adult ED discharges) between August 1, 2018, and December 31, 2018, was conducted using CRISP, Maryland’s state-designated health information exchange. We used this database to identify the index visits that experienced an emergency department visit, inpatient admission, or observation stay at any Maryland facility within 30 days of discharge. We also used data within GetWell Loop to track patient activation and engagement. The primary endpoint was a comparison of ED patients that experienced a 30-day revisit and who did or did not activate their GetWell Loop account. Secondary end points included overall activation rate and the rate of engagement as measured by the number of logins, alerts, and comments generated by patients through the platform. Statistical significance was calculated using the Fisher’s exact test with a P<.05. Results ED discharges who were treated for general medicine conditions (n=787) and activated their GetWell Loop account experienced a 30-day revisit rate of 18.9% compared to 25.2% who did not activate their account (P=.06). For patients treated for cardiology conditions (n=722), 10.5% of patients who activated their GetWell account experienced a 30-day revisit compared to 17.4% not activating their account (P=.02). During the course of this study, 26% of patients receiving an invite to use the digital platform activated their account (n=1652) logged in a total of 4006 times, generated 734 alerts, and submitted 297 open ended comments/questions. Conclusions These results indicate the potential value of digital health platforms to improve 30-day revisit rates. The strongest impact was observed amongst cardiology patients where the revisit rate is 39.8% lower for patients using GetWell Loop compared to general medicine patients where the relative difference is 25.2%. The results also indicate patients are willing to utilize a digital platform postdischarge to proactively engage in their own care. We attempted to control for potential selection bias that may impact this analysis given patient adoption and use of a digital platform by looking for differences in the subpopulations who did and did not activate the platform. LifeBridge Health is proving healthcare systems can leverage automated mobile platforms to successfully impact clinical outcomes at scale without compromising customer service and patient experience.


2008 ◽  
Vol 90 (2) ◽  
pp. 113-116 ◽  
Author(s):  
JA Gossage ◽  
DP Frith ◽  
TWG Carrell ◽  
M Damiani ◽  
J Terris ◽  
...  

INTRODUCTION The aim of this study was to determine whether mobile phones and mobile phone locating devices are associated with improved ambulance response times in central London. PATIENTS AND METHODS All calls from the London Ambulance Service database since 1999 were analysed. In addition, 100 consecutive patients completed a questionnaire on mobile phone use whilst attending the St Thomas's Hospital Emergency Department in central London. RESULTS Mobile phone use for emergencies in central London has increased from 4007 (5% of total) calls in January 1999 to 21,585 (29%) in August 2004. Ambulance response times for mobile phone calls were reduced after the introduction of the mobile phone locating system (mean 469 s versus 444 s; P = 0.0195). The proportion of mobile phone calls made from mobile phones for life-threatening emergencies was higher after injury than for medical emergencies (41% versus 16%, P = 0.0063). Of patients transported to the accident and emergency department by ambulance, 44% contacted the ambulance service by mobile phone. Three-quarters of calls made from outside the home or work-place were by mobile phone and 72% of patients indicated that it would have taken longer to contact the emergency services if they had not used a mobile. CONCLUSIONS Since the introduction of the mobile phone locating system, there has been an improvement in ambulance response times. Mobile locating systems in urban areas across the UK may lead to faster response times and, potentially, improved patient outcomes.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document