scholarly journals The after-COVID syndrome: A survey of posttraumatic stress syndrome in 111 residents in Morocco

2021 ◽  
Vol 429 ◽  
pp. 119893
Author(s):  
Raymond Klevor ◽  
Khalid Ait Taleb ◽  
Najib Kissani ◽  
Mohamed Chraa
2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (9) ◽  
pp. 1280-1292
Author(s):  
Michael W. Lutz ◽  
Sheng Luo ◽  
Douglas E. Williamson ◽  
Ornit Chiba‐Falek

1998 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 51-76 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carole Peterson ◽  
Marleen Biggs

The narratives of children (2-13 years) who had experienced trauma injuries requiring hospital Emergency Room treatment were analyzed for coherence. Specifically, the degree to which the children embedded their accounts within both an orienta-tive and evaluative context was assessed as well as whether they organized their narratives around high points. In addition, distress of the children at both time of injury and of treatment was rated on a 6-point scale by parents. There were qualitative as well as quantitative changes in the narratives of children at different ages. As well, the children who were more distressed produced less coherent accounts. While 9-13-year-olds who were most upset produced more orientative propositions, highly distressed 2-3-year-olds produced fewer, and all age groups produced fewer evaluative propositions as distress increased. It was proposed that this pattern of decreased evaluation resembled the affect flattening found in victims of posttraumatic stress syndrome. As well, the changes in coherence across the preschool years were discussed in terms of their possible contribution to the phenomenon of infantile amnesia. (Psychology)


2016 ◽  
Vol 25 (6) ◽  
pp. 509-515 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heather Warlan ◽  
Lois Howland ◽  
Cynthia Connelly

Background Despite emphasis on identifying personal and clinical characteristics that place patients at higher risk for posttraumatic stress syndrome after intensive care, the extent of screening for the syndrome in intensive care patients is unknown. Objectives To examine the feasibility and acceptability of a screening tool to detect posttraumatic stress syndrome, screen for the syndrome soon after discharge from intensive care to identify patients at risk for post-traumatic stress disorder, and determine personal and clinical factors related to higher scores on the screening instrument. Methods A single-center, cross-sectional design was used. At 2 to 4 weeks after hospital discharge, 41 patients treated in an intensive care unit completed the screening instrument and the Screening Experience Questionnaire via telephone. Associations between participants’ characteristics and scores were examined, and screening experiences were described. Results Participants reported that the screening instrument was easy to understand, caused little distress, and could be completed in an acceptable time frame. Participants reported that they had not been screened via a formal process or received education during or after their stay in the unit. Among the participants, 44% preferred screening in the outpatient setting. Higher scores on the screening tool were associated with history of depression, moderate levels of sedation, and intensive care unit delirium. Conclusions The majority of intensive care patients most likely are not being screened for posttraumatic stress syndrome despite a higher risk for the syndrome in these patients than in the general population.


2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rosaire P. Daigle ◽  
Jami C. Voss ◽  
Douglas C. Strohmer ◽  
Jessie N. Smith ◽  
Christina L. Ingram ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 59 (10) ◽  
pp. 548-555 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michel Préville ◽  
Catherine Lamoureux-Lamarche ◽  
Helen-Maria Vasiliadis ◽  
Sébastien Grenier ◽  
Olivier Potvin ◽  
...  

Objective: To document the 6-month prevalence of posttraumatic stress syndrome (PTSS) in the older adult population and the validity of a PTSS Scale in an epidemiologic setting. Method: Data came from the Enquête sur la santé des aînés et l'utilisation des services de santé (ESA Services Study) conducted during 2012–2013 using a probability sample of older adults seeking medical services in primary health clinics. Results: Results showed that a first-order PTSS measurement model consisting of 3 indicators—the number of lifetime traumatic events, the frequency of reactions and symptoms of distress associated with the traumatic events, and the presence of consequences on the social functioning—was plausible. Reliability of the PTSS was 0.82. According to the PTSS, 11.1% of the older adult patients presented with PTSS, but only 21.7% of them reported an impact of their symptoms on their social functioning. The prevalence of older adults meeting the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, criteria for full posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) reached 1.8%, and 1.8% of older adults reached criteria for partial PTSD. Our results also showed that women were more at risk to report PTSS than men and that older adults aged 75 years and older were less likely to report these symptoms than those aged between 65 and 74 years. Conclusions: PTSS is a common mental health problem among adults aged 65 and older and seeking health services in the general medical sector.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document