scholarly journals The responsiveness of 3D bone shape compared with radiographic joint space width and MR cartilage thickness

2013 ◽  
Vol 21 ◽  
pp. S177-S178
Author(s):  
M.A. Bowes ◽  
C.B. Wolstenholme ◽  
K. De Souza ◽  
G.R. Vincent ◽  
P. Conaghan
Keyword(s):  
Joint Space Width ◽  
Joint Space ◽  
Cartilage Thickness ◽  
Space Width

Change in regional cartilage morphology and joint space width in osteoarthritis participants versus healthy controls: a multicentre study using 3.0 Tesla MRI and Lyon–Schuss radiography

2008 ◽  
Vol 69 (01) ◽  
pp. 155-162 ◽  
Author(s):  
M-P Hellio Le Graverand ◽  
R J Buck ◽  
B T Wyman ◽  
E Vignon ◽  
S A Mazzuca ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Joint Space Width ◽  
Joint Space ◽  
Cartilage Thickness ◽  
Quantitative Mri ◽  
Sensitivity To Change ◽  
3.0 Tesla ◽  
Thickness Change ◽  
Risk Of Progression ◽  
3.0 T ◽  
Space Width

Objective:Cartilage morphology displays sensitivity to change in osteoarthritis (OA) with quantitative MRI (qMRI). However, (sub)regional cartilage thickness change at 3.0 Tesla (T) has not been directly compared with radiographic progression of joint space narrowing in OA participants and non-arthritic controls.Methods:A total of 145 women were imaged at 7 clinical centres: 86 were non-obese and asymptomatic without radiographic OA and 55 were obese with symptomatic and radiographic OA (27 Kellgren–Lawrence grade (KLG)2 and 28 KLG3). Lyon–Schuss (LS) and fixed flexion (FF) radiographs were obtained at baseline, 12 and 24 months, and coronal spoiled gradient echo MRI sequences at 3.0 T at baseline, 6, 12 and 24 months. (Sub)regional, femorotibial cartilage thickness and minimum joint space width (mJSW) in the medial femorotibial compartment were measured and the standardised response means (SRMs) determined.Results:At 6 months, qMRI demonstrated a −3.7% “annualised” change in cartilage thickness (SRM −0.33) in the central medial femorotibial compartment (cMFTC) of KLG3 subjects, but no change in KLG2 subjects. The SRM for mJSW in 12-month LS/FF radiographs of KLG3 participants was −0.68/−0.13 and at 24 months was −0.62/−0.20. The SRM for cMFTC changes measured with qMRI was −0.32 (12 months; −2.0%) and −0.48 (24 months; −2.2%), respectively.Conclusions:qMRI and LS radiography detected significant change in KLG3 participants at high risk of progression, but not in KLG2 participants, and only small changes in controls. At 12 and 24 months, LS displayed greater, and FF less, sensitivity to change in KLG3 participants than qMRI.

scholarly journals OP0185 KNEE JOINT DISTRACTION IS MORE EFFICIENT IN RESTORING CARTILAGE THICKNESS THAN HIGH TIBIAL OSTEOTOMY IN PATIENTS WITH SEVERE KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS

2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 114.2-115
Author(s):  
M. Jansen ◽  
S. Maschek ◽  
R. Van Heerwaarden ◽  
S. Mastbergen ◽  
W. Wirth ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stock Options ◽  
Joint Space Width ◽  
Joint Space ◽  
Cartilage Thickness ◽  
Tibial Osteotomy ◽  
Knee Oa ◽  
Leg Axis ◽  
Cartilage Restoration ◽  
Joint Distraction ◽  
Space Width

Background:Both high tibial osteotomy (HTO) and knee joint distraction (KJD) are joint preserving surgical techniques unloading the affected femorotibial compartment in patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA). While HTO permanently unloads the more affected compartment (MAC) by overcorrecting the leg axis, KJD temporarily unloads the whole joint by separating the tibia and femur for 5 mm for 6 weeks. In a previous randomized controlled trial (RCT), comparable clinical benefit and radiographic joint space width (JSW) increase over 2 years follow-up were demonstrated for both treatments1. Yet, comparison of JSW before and after HTO may be unreliable, as pseudo-widening of the unloaded compartment may occur due to the induced leg axis change. Therefore, direct cartilage thickness measurements need to be compared between KJD and HTO, to accurately evaluate the efficacy of both treatment options on cartilage structure.Objectives:To compare two-year cartilage thickness changes after treatment with KJDvsHTO and identify factors predicting cartilage thickness restoration.Methods:Patients indicated for HTO were randomized to KJD (KJDHTO) or HTO treatment. Patients indicated for total knee arthroplasty received KJD (KJDTKA). Standardized semi-flexed weight-bearing radiographs and 3T MRIs with 3D spoiled gradient recalled imaging sequence with fat suppression (SPGR-fs) were acquired before and two years after surgical treatment. Cartilage thickness in the knee was measured using Chondrometrics Works 3.0 software. On the radiographs the mean JSW in the MAC were measured with KIDA software. Readers were blinded to the type of intervention and acquisition order. The primary and secondary outcomes were the mean MAC cartilage thickness (ThCtAB) and percentage of denuded bone area (dABp) change before and two years after treatment (MRI), with radiographic joint space width (JSW) used as a reference.Results:No statistically significant differences in the baseline characteristics were seen between KJDHTO(n=18) and HTO (n=33). The KJDTKAgroup (n=18) had a higher age and Kellgren-Lawrence grade (KLG) than the HTO and KJDHTOgroups.KJDHTOpatients did not show significant changes in MAC cartilage thickness, dABp, or JSW over time (all p>0.10; figure 1). HTO patients displayed a decrease in MAC cartilage thickness and an increase in dABp (both p<0.03), but an increase in JSW (p=0.006). KJDTKAshowed a significant increase in MAC cartilage thickness and JSW and decrease in dABp (all p<0.01). Baseline OA severity was the strongest predictor of cartilage restoration. KJD patients with severe OA (KJDsevere; KLG ≥3) showed significant restoration (all p<0.01; figure 2); mild OA patients (KJDmild; KLG ≤2) showed a slight deterioration. KJDsevereshowed a significantly greater cartilage restoration response in the MAC than HTOseverefor cartilage thickness (p=0.005) and dABp (p=0.003), but not JSW change (p=0.521). The changes in all three parameters did not differ significantly between KJDmildand HTOmild(all p>0.08).Conclusion:In patients with severe knee OA, KJD is more efficient in restoring cartilage thickness than HTO is. In these patients, KJD causes significant cartilage restoration while HTO, despite shifting the leg axis and demonstrating radiographic joint space widening, shows loss of cartilage as measured on MRI. In patients with mild knee OA, neither HTO nor KJD treatment results in significant cartilage restoration and both treatments show a slight deterioration that is likely the result of natural OA progression. As such, this research promotes the choice KJD as joint-preserving surgery in case of knee OA patients with more severe structural damage.References:[1]MP Jansenet al, Cartilage 2019.Disclosure of Interests:Mylène Jansen: None declared, Susanne Maschek Shareholder of: Stock/stock options at Condrometrics GmbH, Employee of: Employment at Condrometrics GmbH, Ronald Van Heerwaarden: None declared, Simon Mastbergen: None declared, Wolfgang Wirth Shareholder of: Stock/stock options at Condrometrics GmbH, Consultant of: Consultancy to Galapagos NV, Employee of: Employment at Condrometrics GmbH, Floris Lafeber Shareholder of: Co-founder and shareholder of ArthroSave BV, Felix Eckstein Shareholder of: Stock/stock options at Condrometrics GmbH, Consultant of: Consultancy at Merck KGaA, Samumed, Bioclinica, Galapagos, Servier, Novartis, Employee of: Employment at Condrometrics GmbH, Speakers bureau: Development of educational presentations for Medtronic

scholarly journals Comparison between 2D radiographic weight-bearing joint space width and 3D MRI non-weight-bearing cartilage thickness measures in the knee using non-weight-bearing 2D and 3D CT as an intermediary

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
pp. 204062232110378
Author(s):  
Mylène P. Jansen ◽  
Simon C. Mastbergen ◽  
Felix Eckstein ◽  
Ronald J. van Heerwaarden ◽  
Sander Spruijt ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Weight Bearing ◽  
Joint Space Width ◽  
Surrogate Marker ◽  
Joint Space ◽  
Cartilage Thickness ◽  
Poor Correlation ◽  
3D Ct ◽  
Longitudinal Changes ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Space Width

Background: In knee osteoarthritis, radiographic joint space width (JSW) is frequently used as a surrogate marker for cartilage thickness; however, longitudinal changes in radiographic JSW have shown poor correlations with those of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) cartilage thickness. There are fundamental differences between the techniques: radiographic JSW represents two-dimensional (2D), weight-bearing, bone-to-bone distance, while on MRI three-dimensional (3D) non-weight-bearing cartilage thickness is measured. In this exploratory study, computed tomography (CT) was included as a third technique, as it can measure bone-to-bone under non-weight-bearing conditions. The objective was to use CT to compare the impact of weight-bearing versus non-weight-bearing, as well as bone-to-bone JSW versus actual cartilage thickness, in the knee. Methods: Osteoarthritis patients ( n = 20) who were treated with knee joint distraction were included. Weight-bearing radiographs, non-weight-bearing MRIs and CTs were acquired before and 2 years after treatment. The mean radiographic JSW and cartilage thickness of the most affected compartment were measured. From CT, the 3D median JSW was calculated and a 2D projectional image was rendered, positioned similarly and measured identically to the radiograph. Pearson correlations between the techniques were derived, both cross-sectionally and longitudinally. Results: Fourteen patients could be analyzed. Cross-sectionally, all comparisons showed moderate to strong significant correlations (R = 0.43–0.81; all p < 0.05). Longitudinal changes over time were small; only the correlations between 2D CT and 3D CT (R = 0.65; p = 0.01) and 3D CT and MRI (R = 0.62; p = 0.02) were statistically significant. Conclusion: The poor correlation between changes in radiographic JSW and MRI cartilage thickness appears primarily to result from the difference in weight-bearing, and less so from measuring bone-to-bone distance versus cartilage thickness.

scholarly journals A Comparison of Radiographic Joint Space Width Measurements Versus Ultrasonographic Assessment of Cartilage Thickness in Children with Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis

2018 ◽  
Vol 46 (3) ◽  
pp. 301-308
Author(s):  
Dan Østergaard Pradsgaard ◽  
Arne Hørlyck ◽  
Anne Helene Spannow ◽  
Carsten Heuck ◽  
Troels Herlin
Keyword(s):  
Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis ◽  
Joint Space Width ◽  
Conventional Radiography ◽  
Joint Space ◽  
Cartilage Thickness ◽  
Knee Joints ◽  
Healthy Children ◽  
Proximal Site ◽  
Width Measurements ◽  
Space Width

Objective.Joint space narrowing (JSN) is a measurable outcome of tissue degeneration in arthritis. JSN is usually assessed by conventional radiography. Ultrasonographic (US) measurement of joint cartilage thickness has been validated in healthy children, and US measurement of the distal femoral cartilage has been validated in a group of patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA). Our aim was to compare the measures of cartilage thickness of the proximal cartilage site in the second metacarpophalangeal (MCP), second proximal interphalangeal (PIP), and knee joints as assessed by US to joint space width (JSW) as measured by computerized radiography in children with JIA.Methods.The study included 74 children with JIA aged 5–15 years (median 11.3 yrs). MCP and PIP joints were assessed at one midline spot. Knee joints were assessed at the medial and lateral femoral condylar areas. Only the proximal cartilage site in the joints was assessed by US, whereas the complete JSW was assessed by radiography.Results.We assessed 136 second MCP, 138 second PIP, and 146 knee joints. We found a high level of agreement between US and radiographic measures of cartilage thickness and JSW: r = 0.82–0.86 (second MCP), r = 0.50–0.55 (second PIP), and r = 0.52–0.81 (knee); p < 0.001 for all 8 assessed sites.Conclusion.US measurements of cartilage thickness of the proximal site of the second MCP, second PIP, and knee joints correlated well with radiographic JSW measurements in the finger and knee joints of children with JIA. However, US does not measure the distal cartilage, which may limit its use in the assessment of JSN.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document