scholarly journals Joint space width measures cartilage thickness in osteoarthritis of the knee: high resolution plain film and double contrast macroradiographic investigation.

1995 ◽  
Vol 54 (4) ◽  
pp. 263-268 ◽  
Author(s):  
J C Buckland-Wright ◽  
D G Macfarlane ◽  
J A Lynch ◽  
M K Jasani ◽  
C R Bradshaw
2013 ◽  
Vol 21 ◽  
pp. S177-S178
Author(s):  
M.A. Bowes ◽  
C.B. Wolstenholme ◽  
K. De Souza ◽  
G.R. Vincent ◽  
P. Conaghan

2016 ◽  
Vol 43 (10) ◽  
pp. 1941-1944 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephanie Tom ◽  
Mark Frayne ◽  
Sarah L. Manske ◽  
Andrew J. Burghardt ◽  
Kathryn S. Stok ◽  
...  

Objective.The position-dependence of a method to measure the joint space of metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joints using high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HR-pQCT) was studied.Methods.Cadaveric MCP were imaged at 7 flexion angles between 0 and 30 degrees. The variability in reproducibility for mean, minimum, and maximum joint space widths and volume measurements was calculated for increasing degrees of flexion.Results.Root mean square coefficient of variance values were < 5% under 20 degrees of flexion for mean, maximum, and volumetric joint spaces. Values for minimum joint space width were optimized under 10 degrees of flexion.Conclusion.MCP joint space measurements should be acquired at < 10 degrees of flexion in longitudinal studies.


Author(s):  
Victoria David Kuttan ◽  
Deepak Anap ◽  
Sushil Kachevar

Background: Osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee is one of the major causes in musculoskeletal condition leading to functional loss in patients. Determining the progression of the disease is a useful tool which will help in the planning of the exercise programme to slow or halt the disease progression. Measuring the joint space width of the tibiofemoral joint is one of the best options for knowing the disease progression and helps in designing an exercise programme. Aim: Retrospective measurement of joint space width in patients with bilateral tibiofemoral osteoarthritis of the knee joint. Methodology: Data was retrieved from the picture archiving and communication system (PACS) from 1st of February to 22nd of June 2018. Radiographs that were showing OA knee features by using Kellegren Lawrence (KL) grading system were considered and the joint space between the tibial and femoral compartment was measured. Result: The joint space width showed more reduction in the medial compartment of the joint as compared to the lateral compartment. Conclusion: In the rural population of Maharashtra the medial joint space is markedly decreased as compared to the lateral compartment of the tibiofemoral joint and as the KL grade increases the joint space width decreased. Keywords: Osteoarthritis; Knee; Joint space width; Rural Maharashtra.


2008 ◽  
Vol 69 (01) ◽  
pp. 155-162 ◽  
Author(s):  
M-P Hellio Le Graverand ◽  
R J Buck ◽  
B T Wyman ◽  
E Vignon ◽  
S A Mazzuca ◽  
...  

Objective:Cartilage morphology displays sensitivity to change in osteoarthritis (OA) with quantitative MRI (qMRI). However, (sub)regional cartilage thickness change at 3.0 Tesla (T) has not been directly compared with radiographic progression of joint space narrowing in OA participants and non-arthritic controls.Methods:A total of 145 women were imaged at 7 clinical centres: 86 were non-obese and asymptomatic without radiographic OA and 55 were obese with symptomatic and radiographic OA (27 Kellgren–Lawrence grade (KLG)2 and 28 KLG3). Lyon–Schuss (LS) and fixed flexion (FF) radiographs were obtained at baseline, 12 and 24 months, and coronal spoiled gradient echo MRI sequences at 3.0 T at baseline, 6, 12 and 24 months. (Sub)regional, femorotibial cartilage thickness and minimum joint space width (mJSW) in the medial femorotibial compartment were measured and the standardised response means (SRMs) determined.Results:At 6 months, qMRI demonstrated a −3.7% “annualised” change in cartilage thickness (SRM −0.33) in the central medial femorotibial compartment (cMFTC) of KLG3 subjects, but no change in KLG2 subjects. The SRM for mJSW in 12-month LS/FF radiographs of KLG3 participants was −0.68/−0.13 and at 24 months was −0.62/−0.20. The SRM for cMFTC changes measured with qMRI was −0.32 (12 months; −2.0%) and −0.48 (24 months; −2.2%), respectively.Conclusions:qMRI and LS radiography detected significant change in KLG3 participants at high risk of progression, but not in KLG2 participants, and only small changes in controls. At 12 and 24 months, LS displayed greater, and FF less, sensitivity to change in KLG3 participants than qMRI.


2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 114.2-115
Author(s):  
M. Jansen ◽  
S. Maschek ◽  
R. Van Heerwaarden ◽  
S. Mastbergen ◽  
W. Wirth ◽  
...  

Background:Both high tibial osteotomy (HTO) and knee joint distraction (KJD) are joint preserving surgical techniques unloading the affected femorotibial compartment in patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA). While HTO permanently unloads the more affected compartment (MAC) by overcorrecting the leg axis, KJD temporarily unloads the whole joint by separating the tibia and femur for 5 mm for 6 weeks. In a previous randomized controlled trial (RCT), comparable clinical benefit and radiographic joint space width (JSW) increase over 2 years follow-up were demonstrated for both treatments1. Yet, comparison of JSW before and after HTO may be unreliable, as pseudo-widening of the unloaded compartment may occur due to the induced leg axis change. Therefore, direct cartilage thickness measurements need to be compared between KJD and HTO, to accurately evaluate the efficacy of both treatment options on cartilage structure.Objectives:To compare two-year cartilage thickness changes after treatment with KJDvsHTO and identify factors predicting cartilage thickness restoration.Methods:Patients indicated for HTO were randomized to KJD (KJDHTO) or HTO treatment. Patients indicated for total knee arthroplasty received KJD (KJDTKA). Standardized semi-flexed weight-bearing radiographs and 3T MRIs with 3D spoiled gradient recalled imaging sequence with fat suppression (SPGR-fs) were acquired before and two years after surgical treatment. Cartilage thickness in the knee was measured using Chondrometrics Works 3.0 software. On the radiographs the mean JSW in the MAC were measured with KIDA software. Readers were blinded to the type of intervention and acquisition order. The primary and secondary outcomes were the mean MAC cartilage thickness (ThCtAB) and percentage of denuded bone area (dABp) change before and two years after treatment (MRI), with radiographic joint space width (JSW) used as a reference.Results:No statistically significant differences in the baseline characteristics were seen between KJDHTO(n=18) and HTO (n=33). The KJDTKAgroup (n=18) had a higher age and Kellgren-Lawrence grade (KLG) than the HTO and KJDHTOgroups.KJDHTOpatients did not show significant changes in MAC cartilage thickness, dABp, or JSW over time (all p>0.10; figure 1). HTO patients displayed a decrease in MAC cartilage thickness and an increase in dABp (both p<0.03), but an increase in JSW (p=0.006). KJDTKAshowed a significant increase in MAC cartilage thickness and JSW and decrease in dABp (all p<0.01). Baseline OA severity was the strongest predictor of cartilage restoration. KJD patients with severe OA (KJDsevere; KLG ≥3) showed significant restoration (all p<0.01; figure 2); mild OA patients (KJDmild; KLG ≤2) showed a slight deterioration. KJDsevereshowed a significantly greater cartilage restoration response in the MAC than HTOseverefor cartilage thickness (p=0.005) and dABp (p=0.003), but not JSW change (p=0.521). The changes in all three parameters did not differ significantly between KJDmildand HTOmild(all p>0.08).Conclusion:In patients with severe knee OA, KJD is more efficient in restoring cartilage thickness than HTO is. In these patients, KJD causes significant cartilage restoration while HTO, despite shifting the leg axis and demonstrating radiographic joint space widening, shows loss of cartilage as measured on MRI. In patients with mild knee OA, neither HTO nor KJD treatment results in significant cartilage restoration and both treatments show a slight deterioration that is likely the result of natural OA progression. As such, this research promotes the choice KJD as joint-preserving surgery in case of knee OA patients with more severe structural damage.References:[1]MP Jansenet al, Cartilage 2019.Disclosure of Interests:Mylène Jansen: None declared, Susanne Maschek Shareholder of: Stock/stock options at Condrometrics GmbH, Employee of: Employment at Condrometrics GmbH, Ronald Van Heerwaarden: None declared, Simon Mastbergen: None declared, Wolfgang Wirth Shareholder of: Stock/stock options at Condrometrics GmbH, Consultant of: Consultancy to Galapagos NV, Employee of: Employment at Condrometrics GmbH, Floris Lafeber Shareholder of: Co-founder and shareholder of ArthroSave BV, Felix Eckstein Shareholder of: Stock/stock options at Condrometrics GmbH, Consultant of: Consultancy at Merck KGaA, Samumed, Bioclinica, Galapagos, Servier, Novartis, Employee of: Employment at Condrometrics GmbH, Speakers bureau: Development of educational presentations for Medtronic


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document