Consumer preferences and trade in genetically modified foods

2003 ◽  
Vol 25 (8) ◽  
pp. 777-794 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chantal Pohl Nielsen ◽  
Karen Thierfelder ◽  
Sherman Robinson
Author(s):  
Eunae Son ◽  
Song Soo Lim

Food made with gene-editing has received considerable attention in recent years because it is claimed to be a little different from traditional genetically modified breeding methods concerning safety. However, consumer acceptance of these novel foods and their potential market uptake remains to be answered. This study aims to assess differences in the acceptance of gene-edited and genetically modified foods in Korea. The choice-based conjoint analysis is adopted to estimate part-worth functions for the soybean oil attributes with 200 surveyed samples. The estimated part-worth values reveal how much each attribute affects consumers’ decision-making. Estimated results suggest that consumers tend to accept gene-editing more than genetically modified foods. The acceptance of novel technology is shown to correspond closely to the degree of consumers’ scientific knowledge, highlighting the importance of revealing relevant information regarding the technology. Results also show that country of origin is a significant food-specific attitudinal factor in shaping consumer preferences.


2012 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
pp. 15-25 ◽  
Author(s):  
Berta Schnettler ◽  
Horacio Miranda ◽  
José Sepúlveda ◽  
Marianela Denegri

Given the debate generated by Genetically Modified (GM) foods in developed and developing countries, the aim was to evaluate the importance of determining factors in the preference of consumers in Temuco and Talca in central-southern Chile for GM foods using conjoint analysis and to determine the existence of different market segments using a survey of 800 people. Using conjoint analysis, it was established that, in general, genetic modification was a more important factor than either brand or price in the consumer's decision to purchase either food. Cluster analysis identified three segments: the largest (51.4%) assigned greatest importance to brand and preferred genetically modified milk and tomato sauce; the second group (41.0%) gave greatest importance to the existence of genetic manipulation and preferred non-genetically modified foods; the smallest segment (7.6%) mainly valued price and preferred milk and tomato sauce with no genetic manipulation. The three segments rejected the store brand and preferred to pay less for both foods. The results are discussed based on studies conducted in developed and developing countries.


2016 ◽  
Vol 10 (2-3) ◽  
pp. 89-95 ◽  
Author(s):  
L.J. Frewer ◽  
D. Coles ◽  
A.M. Dijkstra ◽  
S. Kuznesof ◽  
H. Kendall ◽  
...  

Synthetic biology offers potential for innovation in the agrifood sector, although concerns have been raised consumer rejection of applications will occur similar to that associated with the introduction of genetically modified foods. Risk-benefit assessment should address socio-economic, as well as health and environmental impacts. Ethical issues may be of particular relevance to the application synthetic biology, and may also resonate with societal concerns. A case-by-case analysis of relevant issues may be needed, and innovation must be driven by societal and consumer preferences as well as technological possibilities. Research into consumer and societal priorities is required early in the innovation trajectory.


2001 ◽  
Vol 107 (5) ◽  
pp. 765-771 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steve L. Taylor ◽  
Susan L. Hefle

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document