scholarly journals Time-domain fitting of battery electrochemical impedance models

2015 ◽  
Vol 288 ◽  
pp. 345-352 ◽  
Author(s):  
S.M.M. Alavi ◽  
C.R. Birkl ◽  
D.A. Howey
2018 ◽  
Vol 51 (15) ◽  
pp. 377-382 ◽  
Author(s):  
Achraf Nasser Eddine ◽  
Benoît Huard ◽  
Jean-Denis Gabano ◽  
Thierry Poinot ◽  
Anthony Thomas ◽  
...  

AIAA Journal ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 39 ◽  
pp. 1449-1454
Author(s):  
K.-Y. Fung ◽  
Hongbin Ju
Keyword(s):  

Energies ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (15) ◽  
pp. 4415
Author(s):  
Brian Ospina Agudelo ◽  
Walter Zamboni ◽  
Eric Monmasson

This paper is a comparative study of the multiple RC, Oustaloup and Grünwald–Letnikov approaches for time domain implementations of fractional-order battery models. The comparisons are made in terms of accuracy, computational burden and suitability for the identification of impedance parameters from time-domain measurements. The study was performed in a simulation framework and focused on a set of ZARC elements, representing the middle frequency range of Li-ion batteries’ impedance. It was found that the multiple RC approach offers the best accuracy–complexity compromise, making it the most interesting approach for real-time battery simulation applications. As for applications requiring the identification of impedance parameters, the Oustaloup approach offers the best compromise between the goodness of the obtained frequency response and the accuracy–complexity requirements.


Author(s):  
Rohit Gaddam ◽  
Leon Katzenmeier ◽  
Xaver Lamprecht ◽  
Aliaksandr Bandarenka

Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) is a versatile tool to understand complex processes in batteries. This technique can investigate the effects of the battery components like the electrode and electrolyte, electrochemical...


2001 ◽  
Vol 43 (4) ◽  
pp. 787-801 ◽  
Author(s):  
C.L Zeng ◽  
W Wang ◽  
W.T Wu

Batteries ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 52 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicolas Sockeel ◽  
John Ball ◽  
Masood Shahverdi ◽  
Michael Mazzola

Estimation of a lithium battery electrical impedance can provide relevant information regarding its characteristics. Currently, electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) constitutes the most recognized and accepted method. Although highly precise and robust, EIS is usually performed during laboratory testing and is not suitable for any on-board application, such as in battery electric vehicles (BEVs) because it is an instrumentally and computationally heavy method. To address this issue and on-line system applications, this manuscript describes, as a main contribution, a passive method for battery impedance estimation in the time domain that involves the voltage and current profile induced by the battery through its ordinary operation without injecting a small excitation signal. This method has been tested on the same battery with different passive voltage and current profile and has been validated by achieving similar results. Compared to the original idea presented in the published conference paper, this manuscript explains, in detail, the previously developed method of transforming the battery impedance from the frequency domain to time domain. Moreover, this impedance measurement is used to estimate more robustly the battery state of charge (SoC) through Kalman filters. In the original published conference paper, only an extended Kalman filter (EKF) was applied. However, in this manuscript, an EKF and an unscented Kalman filter (UKF) are used and their performances are compared.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document