scholarly journals The comparability of intelligence test results: Group- and individual-level comparisons of seven intelligence tests

2021 ◽  
Vol 88 ◽  
pp. 101-117
Author(s):  
Anette Bünger ◽  
Silvia Grieder ◽  
Florine Schweizer ◽  
Alexander Grob
Author(s):  
Carleen Franz ◽  
Lee Ascherman ◽  
Julia Shaftel

Intellectual assessment includes the broad range of cognitive skills and processes as measured by major intelligence tests. Intelligence testing is an integral part of the assessment process; however, it is often misunderstood. A great deal of weight is assigned to the scores, and decisions are often made that are not justified by the results. It is important for the clinician to understand the nature of the process, the types and interpretations of the scores, and the limitations, to avoid common fallacies. Two of the predominant tests, the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-V and the Woodcock-Johnson IV Tests of Cognitive Abilities, are described. Some misconceptions about IQ are explained, and interpretation of intelligence test results is carefully spelled out for the clinician unfamiliar with these tools. The various scores derived from the results of intelligence tests are clarified.


2014 ◽  
pp. 229-253
Author(s):  
Leigh Peck

1973 ◽  
Vol 33 (1) ◽  
pp. 127-130 ◽  
Author(s):  
Louis S. Dickstein ◽  
Jayne Ayers

Previous research has indicated that the manipulation of motivating conditions through explicit examiner's expectancy of good performance can significantly improve performance on intelligence tests. In the present study, the manipulation of incentive was used to improve performance. College women were told that the five best scorers would receive monetary rewards. The group receiving incentive-instructions scored significantly higher than the control group on the WAIS Performance Scale and on the Object Assembly subtest. No difference between the groups was obtained for the Advanced Progressive Matrices.


1981 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 223-226 ◽  
Author(s):  
Linda L. Marshall ◽  
Robert F. Kidd

Commonsense reasoning predicts that people prefer hearing bad news before good news rather than the reverse. In two role-playing experiments, subjects were asked if they preferred to hear good news/bad news or bad news/good news. In a third experiment, subjects believed they would be receiving good and bad information about themselves from a personality, social sensitivity, or intelligence test. Results from all three studies showed that subjects overwhelmingly preferred to hear bad news first. Two possible interpretations of the results were offered. One interpretation derived from the gain-loss phenomenon in interpersonal attraction and the other from Helson's adaptation-level theory.


Konselor ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Khairul Ummah ◽  
Asmidir Ilyas ◽  
Dina Sukma

BK teachers have a very big role in providing an understanding of the different characteristics of students, which includes intelligence. Therefore, researchers feel the need to conduct research on student's perceptions about information intelligence test results through information services by BK teacher in high school Adabiah Padang. This study aimed descriptive form to describe the perceptions of students about information intelligence test results through information services by BK teacher. The population of this study were all high school students of class XI Adabiah Padang. Data collection tool was a questionnaire that reveals student's perceptions about information intelligence test results through information services by BK teacher, then the collected data were analyzed by using percentages. The findings of the study revealed that student's perceptions about information intelligence test results through information services by BK teachers belong to the category quite well. Based on the findings of the study suggested, should be able to provide more intensive information on the results of intelligence test, especially to students who do not understand the benefits and follow-up of intelligence test results obtained.


Author(s):  
Ian J. Deary

The new field of cognitive epidemiology looks at whether intelligence tests might have some predictive power in health, and even for death. ‘Does intelligence matter for good health and long life?’ discusses the results of various studies that link the results of intelligence tests at age 11 with medical records in later life. The results show that there is a robust association between higher intelligence test scores in early life and living longer, and having a lower risk of dying from several causes. They also show that, on average, people with higher childhood intelligence have a lower risk of developing various illnesses and are more likely to adopt healthier behaviours as adults.


1982 ◽  
Vol 29 (7) ◽  
pp. 50-54
Author(s):  
Donald J. Freeman ◽  
Therese M. Kuhs ◽  
Lucy B. Knappen ◽  
Andrew C. Porter

It is commonly argued that teachers should use scores from standardized tests to facilitate instruction. Specifically, teachers are encouraged to use standardized test results to evaluate student achievement on both a group and individual level, to identify students with learning problems, and to assess the effectiveness of instructional strategies that have been used. The use of standardized tests for any of these functions, however, must be tempered by the teacher's knowledge of the extent to which the content of the test parallels the content of instruction.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document