Intellectual Assessment

Author(s):  
Carleen Franz ◽  
Lee Ascherman ◽  
Julia Shaftel

Intellectual assessment includes the broad range of cognitive skills and processes as measured by major intelligence tests. Intelligence testing is an integral part of the assessment process; however, it is often misunderstood. A great deal of weight is assigned to the scores, and decisions are often made that are not justified by the results. It is important for the clinician to understand the nature of the process, the types and interpretations of the scores, and the limitations, to avoid common fallacies. Two of the predominant tests, the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-V and the Woodcock-Johnson IV Tests of Cognitive Abilities, are described. Some misconceptions about IQ are explained, and interpretation of intelligence test results is carefully spelled out for the clinician unfamiliar with these tools. The various scores derived from the results of intelligence tests are clarified.

Assessment ◽  
2019 ◽  
pp. 107319111986982 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefan C. Dombrowski ◽  
Ryan J. McGill ◽  
Grant B. Morgan

Researchers continue to debate the constructs measured by commercial ability tests. Factor analytic investigations of these measures have been used to develop and refine widely adopted psychometric theories of intelligence particularly the Cattell–Horn–Carroll (CHC) model. Even so, this linkage may be problematic as many of these investigations examine a particular instrument in isolation and CHC model specification across tests and research teams has not been consistent. To address these concerns, the present study used Monte Carlo resampling to investigate the latent structure of four of the most widely used intelligence tests for children and adolescents. The results located the approximate existence of the publisher posited CHC theoretical group factors in the Differential Abilities Scales–Second edition and the Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children–Second edition but not in the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children–Fifth edition or the Woodcock–Johnson IV Tests of Cognitive Abilities. Instead, the results supported alternative conceptualizations from independent factor analytic research. Additionally, whereas a bifactor model produced superior fit indices in two instruments (Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children–Fifth edition and Woodcock–Johnson IV Tests of Cognitive Abilities), a higher order structure was found to be superior in the Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children–Second edition and the Differential Abilities Scales–Second edition. Regardless of the model employed, the general factor captured a significant portion of each instrument’s variance. Implications for IQ test assessment, interpretation, and theory are discussed.


Author(s):  
Zlatica Jursová Zacharová ◽  
Miroslava Lemešová ◽  
Lenka Sokolová

In recent years there has been increased attention to the problem of teachers' competences. The need for developing critical thinking in schools turns the focus also on the teachers' cognitive skills including not only intelligence but also cognitive reflection and implicit theories of intelligence. This study aimed to analyse pre-service teachers' (N = 344) cognitive profiles covering data from cognitive reflection test (CRT), implicit theories of intelligence test and Mannheim intelligence test (MIT, measuring verbal, numerical and spatial abilities). Significant correlations were found between cognitive reflection and other cognitive abilities. However, the implicit theories of intelligence seemed to be independent of cognitive abilities. Significant differences between senior and junior pre-service teachers were found in cognitive reflection and two MIT items. Based on the presented results, we discuss the assessment of pre-service teachers’ competences and the development of critical and higher order thinking in pre-gradual teacher education. 


2015 ◽  
Vol 14 (02) ◽  
pp. 221-237 ◽  
Author(s):  
Feng Liu ◽  
Yong Shi ◽  
Bo Wang

With increasing concern about Internet intelligence, this paper proposes concepts of the Internet and Internet subsystem IQs over search engines. Based on human IQ calculations, the paper first establishes a 2014 Internet Intelligence Scale and designs an intelligence test bank regarding search engines. Then, an intelligence test using such test bank is carried out on 50 typical search engines from 25 countries and regions across the world. Meanwhile, another intelligence test is also conducted in the human age groups of 6, 12 and 18 years using the same test bank and rules. Next, the absolute IQ and the relative IQ of the 53 test subjects are calculated in accordance with the test results. Finally, the data mining method is applied to find out the features of search engines reflected in the Internet intelligence test and the intelligence difference between search engines and human beings.


2021 ◽  
Vol 88 ◽  
pp. 101-117
Author(s):  
Anette Bünger ◽  
Silvia Grieder ◽  
Florine Schweizer ◽  
Alexander Grob

1985 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 11-23 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gregg F. Ingram ◽  
Lana J. Hakari

In order to determine the concurrent validity of the Woodcock-Johnson Tests of Cognitive Ability (WJTCA) in relation to the Weschler Intelligence Scale for Children-Revised (WISC-R) for elementary school children identified as gifted, and two tests were administered to 33 subjects in a counterbalanced fashion. The subjects were selected based on three factors: (1) parent and/or teacher judgments; (2) parental permission to test; and (3) a standard age score of 120 or above on a group intelligence test. Pearson Product-Moment Corelation Coefficients were calculated between all combinations of WISC-R IQ's paired with WJTCA cluster scores. A significant relationship was found to exist between the two tests’ full scale scores. Most of the WJTCA clusters correlated significantly with the WISC-R Scale IQ which suggests a high verbal loading on the WJTCA.


1970 ◽  
Vol 27 (3) ◽  
pp. 819-822 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jerry Willis

IQs obtained on a group intelligence test (Lorge-Thorndike Intelligence Test) were compared with those obtained on an individual intelligence test (Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children) for 20 disturbed children. While the correlation between the scores was .81, the mean IQs were significantly different (93 vs 108), group test tending to give much lower IQs.


1986 ◽  
Vol 58 (3) ◽  
pp. 887-889 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frances A. Karnes ◽  
James E. Whorton ◽  
Billie Bob Currie ◽  
Steven W. Cantrall

For a sample of 173 intellectually gifted students, percentiles from the Developing Cognitive Abilities Test were correlated with IQs from the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children—Revised, Stanford-Binet, and Slosson Intelligence Test—Revised. Although the coefficients of the WISC—R and Slosson with the DCAT tended to be significant, they were too low to have practical meaning and those with Stanford-Binet IQs were nonsignificant.


Author(s):  
Annette Mülberger

The intelligence test consists of a series of exercises designed to measure intelligence. Intelligence is generally understood as mental capacity that enables a person to learn at school or, more generally, to reason, to solve problems, and to adapt to new (challenging) situations. There are many types of intelligence tests depending on the kind of person (age, profession, culture, etc.) and the way intelligence is understood. Some tests are general, others are focused on evaluating language skills, others on memory, on abstract and logical thinking, or on abilities in a wide variety of areas, such as, for example, recognizing and matching implicit visual patterns. Scores may be presented as an IQ (intelligence quotient), as a mental age, or simply as a point on a scale. Intelligence tests are instrumental in ordering, ranking, and comparing individuals and groups. The testing of intelligence started in the 19th century and became a common practice in schools and universities, psychotechnical institutions, courts, asylums, and private companies on an international level during the 20th century. It is generally assumed that the first test was designed by the French scholars A. Binet and T. Simon in 1905, but the historical link between testing and experimenting points to previous tests, such as the word association test. Testing was practiced and understood in different ways, depending not only on the time, but also on the concrete local (cultural and institutional) conditions. For example, in the United States and Brazil, testing was immediately linked to race differences and eugenic programs, while in other places, such as Spain, it was part of an attempt to detect “feebleness” and to grade students at certain schools. Since its beginning, the intelligence test received harsh criticism and triggered massive protests. The debate went through the mass media, leading to the infamous “IQ test wars.” Thus, nowadays, psychologists are aware of the inherent danger of cultural discrimination and social marginalization, and they are more careful in the promotion of intelligence testing. In order to understand the role the intelligence test plays in today’s society, it is necessary to explore its history with the help of well-documented case studies. Such studies show how the testing practice was employed in national contexts and how it was received, used, or rejected by different social groups or professionals. Current historical research adopts a more inclusive perspective, moving away from a narrative focused on the role testing played in North-America. New work has appeared that explores how testing was taking place in different national and cultural environments, such as Russia (the former Soviet Union), India, Italy, the Netherlands, Sweden, Argentina, Chile, and many other places.


1979 ◽  
Vol 88 (5_suppl) ◽  
pp. 64-77 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frances Degen Horowitz

The use of intelligence tests to assess the effects of otitis media on the development of children is discussed in this article. An overview of the development of intelligence tests is provided and some of the limitations and central issues of controversy concerning intelligence testing and the IQ are reviewed. Basic intelligence tests are described in terms of their characteristics and uses; the questions which an investigator must ask about any given intelligence test measure are posed and answered. Finally, cautions concerning the applicability of intelligence tests for evaluating the effects of otitis media are offered.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document