Leukocyte filtration and postoperative infections

2016 ◽  
Vol 205 (2) ◽  
pp. 499-509 ◽  
Author(s):  
Seunghyug Kwon ◽  
Sungyub Lew ◽  
Ronald S. Chamberlain
Circulation ◽  
1973 ◽  
Vol 48 (1s3) ◽  
Author(s):  
RICHARD M. ENGELMAN ◽  
RANDOLPH M. CHASE ◽  
ARTHUR D. BOYD ◽  
GEORGE E. REED

Biology ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 137
Author(s):  
Xinzhen Fan ◽  
L’Hocine Yahia ◽  
Edward Sacher

Microbes, including bacteria and fungi, easily form stable biofilms on many surfaces. Such biofilms have high resistance to antibiotics, and cause nosocomial and postoperative infections. The antimicrobial and antiviral behaviors of Ag and Cu nanoparticles (NPs) are well known, and possible mechanisms for their actions, such as released ions, reactive oxygen species (ROS), contact killing, the immunostimulatory effect, and others have been proposed. Ag and Cu NPs, and their derivative NPs, have different antimicrobial capacities and cytotoxicities. Factors, such as size, shape and surface treatment, influence their antimicrobial activities. The biomedical application of antimicrobial Ag and Cu NPs involves coating onto substrates, including textiles, polymers, ceramics, and metals. Because Ag and Cu are immiscible, synthetic AgCu nanoalloys have different microstructures, which impact their antimicrobial effects. When mixed, the combination of Ag and Cu NPs act synergistically, offering substantially enhanced antimicrobial behavior. However, when alloyed in Ag–Cu NPs, the antimicrobial behavior is even more enhanced. The reason for this enhancement is unclear. Here, we discuss these results and the possible behavior mechanisms that underlie them.


Urology ◽  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sunchin Kim ◽  
Katherine C. Cheng ◽  
Saatchi Patell ◽  
Nejd F. Alsikafi ◽  
Benjamin N. Breyer ◽  
...  

2002 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 285-292 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Sander ◽  
M. Irwin ◽  
P. Sinha ◽  
E. Naumann ◽  
W. Kox ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 96 (4) ◽  
pp. 272-278 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard Friedman ◽  
Martin Homering ◽  
Gerlind Holberg ◽  
Scott D. Berkowitz

2015 ◽  
Vol 61 (6) ◽  
pp. 133S
Author(s):  
Tristen T. Chun ◽  
Daithi S. Heffernan ◽  
William G. Cioffi ◽  
Jeffrey M. Slaiby ◽  
Edward J. Marcaccio ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Siwanon Rattanakanokchai ◽  
Nuntasiri Eamudomkarn ◽  
Nampet Jampathong ◽  
Bao-Yen Luong-Thanh ◽  
Chumnan Kietpeerakool

AbstractThis systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to assess associations between changing gloves during cesarean section (CS) and postoperative infection. A literature search was conducted using the major electronic databases MEDLINE, Scopus, ISI Web of Science, PubMed, CINAHL, and CENTRAL from their inception to September 2020. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing glove change during CS to no glove change were included. Outcomes of interest were endometritis, febrile morbidity, and incisional surgical site infection (SSI). GRADE approach was applied to assess the quality of evidence. Ten reports of six studies involving 1707 participants were included in the analyses. Glove change was associated with a reduction in the risk of incisional SSI following CS (pooled RR 0.49, 95% CI 0.30, 0.78; moderate quality of evidence). Compared to no glove change, glove change during CS did not reduce the risks of endometritis (pooled RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.80, 1.24; low quality of evidence) or febrile morbidity (pooled RR 0.85, 95% CI 0.43, 1.71; very low quality of evidence). Changing gloves during CS was associated with a decreased risk of incisional SSI. The risks of postoperative endometritis and febrile morbidity were not altered by changing gloves.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document