Temporal Validation of an Assessment Tool that Predicts a Possibility of Home Discharge for Patients with Acute Stroke

Author(s):  
Takahiro Itaya ◽  
Yusuke Murakami ◽  
Akiko Ota ◽  
Ryo Shimomura ◽  
Tomoko Fukushima ◽  
...  
2016 ◽  
Vol 31 (7) ◽  
pp. 966-977 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth A Lynch ◽  
Julie A Luker ◽  
Dominique A Cadilhac ◽  
Caroline E Fryer ◽  
Susan L Hillier

Objective: To explore the factors perceived to affect rehabilitation assessment and referral practices for patients with stroke. Design: Qualitative study using data from focus groups analysed thematically and then mapped to the Theoretical Domains Framework. Setting: Eight acute stroke units in two states of Australia. Subjects: Health professionals working in acute stroke units. Interventions: Health professionals at all sites had participated in interventions to improve rehabilitation assessment and referral practices, which included provision of copies of an evidence-based decision-making rehabilitation Assessment Tool and pathway. Results: Eight focus groups were conducted (32 total participants). Reported rehabilitation assessment and referral practices varied markedly between units. Continence and mood were not routinely assessed (4 units), and people with stroke symptoms were not consistently referred to rehabilitation (4 units). Key factors influencing practice were identified and included whether health professionals perceived that use of the Assessment Tool would improve rehabilitation assessment practices (theoretical domain ‘social and professional role’); beliefs about outcomes from changing practice such as increased equity for patients or conversely that changing rehabilitation referral patterns would not affect access to rehabilitation (‘belief about consequences’); the influence of the unit’s relationships with other groups including rehabilitation teams (‘social influences’ domain) and understanding within the acute stroke unit team of the purpose of changing assessment practices (‘knowledge’ domain). Conclusion: This study has identified that health professionals’ perceived roles, beliefs about consequences from changing practice and relationships with rehabilitation service providers were perceived to influence rehabilitation assessment and referral practices on Australian acute stroke units.


2019 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
pp. 117957351989708
Author(s):  
Jannik Stokholm ◽  
Janni Vagner Steenholt ◽  
Claudio Csilag ◽  
Troels Wesenberg Kjær ◽  
Thomas Christensen

Purpose: The purpose of this systematic literature review was to examine whether different assessment methods contribute to the variance in delirium incidence detected in populations of patients with acute stroke. Specifically, the aim was to address the influence of (1) choice of assessment tool, (2) frequency of assessment, and (3) type of health professional doing the assessment. Methods: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and PsycINFO and included pro- and retrospective cohort studies assessing delirium during hospitalization of adult acute stroke patients. Results: In 30 articles, 24 unique populations were identified and included in the review. Delirium incidence ranged from 1.4% to 75.6% in total and a chi-square test showed a significant heterogeneity across studies (χ2 = 536.5, df = 23, P < .0001). No studies had an assessment for delirium before a patient entered the study. No specific patterns regarding the influence of tool, assessment frequency or health professional were discernible. Discussion: Subgroups analyses were not conducted due to the heterogeneity across studies. Studies comparing delirium assessment tools directly with each other are needed. Conclusions: Delirium is a common complication in acute stroke. No firm conclusions about a possible correlation of choice of tool, assessment frequency, and delirium incidence could be made due to the great heterogeneity of the study populations. Only 1 study compared 2 tools directly with each other. Further studies comparing delirium assessment tools directly with each other are needed.


Author(s):  
Jacqueline K. Benfield ◽  
Gwenllian Wilkinson ◽  
Lisa F. Everton ◽  
Philip M. Bath ◽  
Timothy J. England

Author(s):  
Mersedeh Bahr-Hosseini ◽  
Marom Bikson ◽  
Marco Iacoboni ◽  
David S. Liebeskind ◽  
Jason D. Hinman ◽  
...  

AbstractMany neuroprotective and other therapies for treatment of acute ischemic stroke have failed in translation to human studies, indicating a need for more rigorous, multidimensional quality assessment of the totality of preclinical evidence supporting a therapy prior to conducting human trials. A consensus panel of stroke preclinical model and human clinical trial experts assessed candidate items for the translational readiness scale, compiled from prior instruments (STAIR, ARRIVE, CAMARADES, RoB 2) based on importance, reliability, and feasibility. Once constructed, the tool was applied by two independent raters to four current candidate acute stroke therapies, including two pharmacologic agents [nerinetide and trans-sodium crocetinate] and two device interventions [cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation and fastigial nucleus stimulation]. The Preclinical evidence of Readiness In stroke Models Evaluating Drugs and Devices (PRIMED2) assessment tool rates the totality of evidence available from all reported preclinical animal stroke model studies in 11 domains related to diversity of tested animals, time windows, feasibility of agent route of delivery, and robustness of effect magnitude. Within each content domain, clearly operationalized rules assign strength of evidence ratings of 0–2. When applied to the four assessed candidate agents, inter-rater reliability was high (kappa = 0.88), and each agent showed a unique profile of evidentiary strengths and weaknesses. The PRIMED2 assessment tool provides a multidimensional assessment of the cumulative preclinical evidence for a candidate acute stroke therapy on factors judged important for successful basic-to-clinical translation. Further evaluation and refinement of this tool is desirable to improve successful translation of therapies for acute stroke.


Nutrients ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 943
Author(s):  
Yoichi Sato ◽  
Yoshihiro Yoshimura ◽  
Takafumi Abe

Malnutrition is associated with poor clinical outcomes in stroke patients. The effect of early nutritional intake after admission on home discharge is unclear. We evaluated the impact of energy intake in the first week of hospitalization of acute stroke patients on home discharge and activities of daily living (ADL). A retrospective cohort study was conducted with 201 stroke patients admitted to an acute care hospital in Japan. The energy and protein intake during the first week were evaluated. Multivariate models were used to estimate variables related to discharge destination and ADL at discharge. The cut-off point of nutritional intake for determining the discharge destination was evaluated using the receiver operating characteristic curve. Out of 163 patients included in the analysis, 89 (54.6%) and 74 (45.4%) were discharged home and elsewhere, respectively. Those discharged home had higher energy and protein intake than those discharged elsewhere. In multiple regression analysis, energy intake was independently associated with ADL at discharge and home discharge (odds ratio 1.146). Those with energy intake >20.7 kcal/kg/day had higher ADL at discharge and more patients discharged home than those with energy intake <20.7 kcal/kg/day. Energy intake during the first week affected home discharge in acute stroke patients.


Stroke ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 48 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ken-ichi Kumagae ◽  
Kohta Yamauchi ◽  
Risa Hagiwara ◽  
Yasuhiro Koyanagi ◽  
Shuji Arakawa ◽  
...  

Background and Purpose: Lower extremity function is a strong predictor for functional outcome and death in a variety of pathological status. National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) is a world-wide standard scoring system for stroke patients; however, it is not sufficient to evaluate lower extremity function. Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) is a simple assessment tool for lower extremity function, consists of standing balance, walking speed, and repetitive standing (range: 0-12, 12: high function). SPPB can predict adverse events, such as disability and mortality in elderly population, but its disease specific utility for stroke patients is still unknown. The purpose of this study was to determine whether SPPB score predicts functional independence and death for acute stroke. Methods: Between April 2013 and November 2014, 410 consecutive stroke patients admitted within 7 days after the onset. Patients with premorbid modified Rankin Scale (mRS) of 0-2, and evaluated SPPB at 7 th days after the admission were enrolled in this study. Clinical data were analyzed using univariate and multivariate model to assess functional independence (defined as mRS of 0-2) at 3 months and 1 year mortality adjusting covariates to investigate the association between SPPB and functional independence or death. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve analysis was performed for detecting optimal cut-off value. Results: A total of 243 patients (mean age 73.8 years, male 58.4%) were included in this study. Of them, 132 (54.3%) patients were independent at 3 months follow up, and 14 (5.8%) patients have died. Median SPPB score at 7 th days after the admission was 6 (IQR: 1-11). After adjusting age, sex, BMI, NIHSS score on admission, SPPB score at 7 th days after the admission was significantly associated with 3-month functional independence (odds ratio, 1.48; 95%CI, 1.29-1.69; p<0.001) and 1-year death (hazard ratio, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.17-0.74; p=0.005). ROC curve analysis revealed the cut-off point of SPPB for functional independence was 6 (AUC:0.88, 95%CI, 0.83-0.93, p<0.001, sensitivity: 0.83, specificity:0.84). Conclusions: Early SPPB score is a useful assessment tool in predicting functional independence and death for acute stroke patients.


PM&R ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 5 ◽  
pp. S155-S155
Author(s):  
Margaret G. Stineman ◽  
Pui L. Kwong ◽  
Barbara E. Bates ◽  
Jibby Kurichi ◽  
Diane Cowper Ripley ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 23 (7) ◽  
pp. 314-322 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul M Williams ◽  
Caroline Johnson ◽  
Sarah Swan ◽  
Caroline Barber ◽  
Patrick Murphy ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document